Faithful and Discreet Slave serves LEFTOVERS!!???

by Terry 6 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Terry
    Terry

    Does Jehovah's Faithful and Discreet Slave get leftover New Light?

    If a spokesman is chosen and appointed to speak on behalf of another in an official capacity

    we would expected all "breaking news" to emerge from that outlet. Wouldn't we?

    We would find it odd and even a refutation of a claim of special selection if that self-styled

    spokesman were the LAST to publish the news, certainly.

    Yet, time and again, the Watchtower Magazine has failed to release New Light before any other religious person or body. How can that be?

    May 15th, 1995, Watchtower magazine carried a two-part study article recounting instances in the history of the Society when "New Light" flashed before them as the mouthpiece of God.

    The Subject of Christmas celebrations and the new understanding of its pagan origins was revealed:

    “Shortly thereafter, a flash of light caused the Bible Students to stop celebrating Christmas. Before that time Christmas had always been celebrated by the Bible Students worldwide, and its celebration at Brooklyn headquarters was a very festive occasion. But then it was discerned that the observance of December 25 was actually pagan and was chosen by apostate Christendom to make it easier to convert pagans.”

    “Shortly thereafter” is in reference to the year 1926. This New Light must have come first through

    this select body of True Believers, right? Wrong!

    Alexander Hislop had published his peculiar book, The Two Babylons, a whopping 75years prior to the time the Bible Students suddenly flashed on this revelation about Christmas, in which Hislop painstakingly sought to build an argument about the Babylonish character of Christmas.

    Three quarters of a century delay? How embarassing!

    What else did this 1995 Watchtower article identify as New Light channeled through Jehovah's specially "selected channel"?

    “For many years the Bible Students made the cross prominent as a symbol of Christianity. They even had a “cross-and-crown” pin… For decades this symbol also appeared on the cover of the Watch Tower magazine. The book Riches, published by the Society in 1936, made clear that Jesus Christ was executed, not on a cross, but on an upright pole, or stake.”

    Yet, in 1858 Alexander Hislop used the same reasoning and examples to put forward the same conclusions as the "New Light" of 1936 in the Watchtower. Why fail to credit Hislop's jump start on this conclusion? Why claim it as their special revelation?

    The plot thickens, however!

    Even in their own errors about the "meaning" of scriptures the Watchtower fails to be first in releasing and understanding either New Light or its later revised "correction"!

    “A bright flash of light was seen in 1962 in connection with Romans 13:1…The early Bible Students understood that “the higher powers” mentioned there referred to worldly authorities. They took this scripture to mean that if a Christian was drafted in wartime, he would be obligated to put on a uniform, shoulder a gun, and go to the front, to the trenches. It was felt that since a Christian could not kill a fellow human, he would be compelled to fire his gun into the air if worst came to worst. The Watchtower of November 15 and of December 1, 1962, shed clear light on the subject…”

    This 1962 flash of light corrected--not the Bible Students understanding--but, the wacky false New Light by Watchtower Society's President J.F.Rutherford!

    Commenting on Romans 13:1 in the July 1st, 1931, Watchtower, Rutherford said:

    “Until quite recently God’s people understood…that this scripture has reference to worldly ruling powers. Those who have withdrawn from the Society still hold this wrongful view. Now, however, the faithful remnant clearly see that this scripture has no reference to any part of Satan’s organization but does apply exclusively to God’s arrangement in his organization for his own people. Those who refuse to see this truth and who oppose the statement of The Watch Tower concerning it have seized upon such as an excuse and have dropped out and have gone into the dark.”

    Wow! A double whammy of error and never the first to get it right!

    Let's review another instance of real foot-dragging coming to a flash of New Light.

    Until 1973 Bethel did not prohibit smokers from becoming baptized Jehovah’s Witnesses.

    That changed with a flash of light. Watchtower’s new light classified casual smokers in the same category as practicing fornicators, greedy persons, idolaters, revilers, drunkards and extortioners, which were the sorts of persons the inspired apostle said, should be removed from the congregation.

    The Mormon leader Brigham Young, however, beat Jehovah's Anointed channel to this New Light in 1833's Words of Wisdom revealed by the Lord Himself!

    Add to this the fact the Pastor Russell merely adopted 2nd Adventist's peculiar theories that Jesus

    had already returned invisibly and Pyramidologist's crackpot ideas about the Great Pyramid revealing 1914 as the Armageddon of the bible!

    Should we feel embarassed that the Faithful and Discreet Slave do NOT give Jehovah's domestics "food at the proper time" because they only serve LEFTOVERS?

  • kurtbethel
    kurtbethel

    The Yahweh gods might send an occasional memo to the governing body channeling committee, but it is usually as an afterthought way after the fact.

  • Terry
    Terry

    The Society just HAS TO KNOW their members DO NOT READ outside the box or they'd be way too embarassed to print the claims they make.

    With the advent of the Internet the liklihood of somebody stumbling across damning evidence is much greater than pre-90's non-Internet days.

    A concerted effort has been launched to keep people stupid and afraid to read any "outside" writings.

    What nitwit would heed such warnings?

    It should be a red flag!!

  • King Solomon
    King Solomon

    Terry said:

    A concerted effort has been launched to keep people stupid and afraid to read any "outside" writings.

    What nitwit would heed such warnings?

    It should be a red flag!!

    In case you haven't noticed, there's no shortage of nit-wits? :)

    Heck, when I was a kid, they similarly discouraged education, independent thought, maybe even moreso than today. And even though the internet has made it EASIER to research nowadays, the facts have been readily available to ANYONE who exerted even a slight amount of effort to go to a library. Few JWs availed themselves of that, as being seen in a library was viewed as verboten as emerging from a porn shop.

    Think back: you once WERE such a nit-wit. Why didn't YOU see it then (and it's NOT about access to counter-evidence). There's the likely answer for why JWs still continue....

  • Terry
    Terry

    I'm sitting here trying to think of anything original or novel this religion can claim for itself.............I guess it would be making a fetish out of

    the mispronounced "name" of God and then removing Jesus from worship and denying participation in the Lord's Evening Meal.

    That's really something to be proud of, eh?

  • panhandlegirl
    panhandlegirl

    When I was in my early-mid twenties my older brother, who had been an elder, was always giving me reasons why the FDS was wrong about many things. I did not believe him but his reasonings began to make inroads into my

    faith in the FDS. By the time I reached my mid-thirties, I had started fading. I no longer attended meeting or did field service by "76. I don't really think I was a nit-wit. It is difficult to leave everything you have always believed and

    everyone you have know for your entire life. I did it, but I still feel "in trasition." I don't belive there is any FDS nor do I believe anything they teach, but as long as the majority of my family is still in, I am not totally free. As we can

    see from those on this forum that stay in the borg because they are not ready to lose their entire family, the borg has the ability to hold you hostage. I guess some don't leave out of fear or the inability to admit that everything

    they have believed was a lie.

  • Terry
    Terry

    I don't belive there is any FDS nor do I believe anything they teach, but as long as the majority of my family is still in, I am not totally free. As we can

    see from those on this forum that stay in the borg because they are not ready to lose their entire family, the borg has the ability to hold you hostage. I guess some don't leave out of fear or the inability to admit that everything

    they have believed was a lie.

    The FDS is a gimmick. Once you see through that gimmick you can never take anything about the religion seriously again.

    The "magic" of knowing things only Jehovah tells you is replaced by crazy old men making wild guesses that never come out straight.

    Then, you become very conscious of all the ways your life is twisted out of normal.

    Your kids are made into oddballs and nobody is able to have fun or be a part of the celebrations of the human race again.

    It is a heavy price to pay just to sit in a folding chair and listen to horse shit braided into a pretzel.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit