I agree that, in an ideal world, Wright should have "gone for the throat" more - especially in asserting the reality of brainwashing. However, that is not his style.
I would expect someone like Wright to take all measures to inform the public of the truth about cults as told by current scientific data. Right now the cult topic is hot and now is the time to educate the public. Scientology's system should have been exposed and strongly correlated to the science of mind control, which according to the world's leading mind control scientist, Steven Hassan, it does not. This makes me wonder about the motivations of both Wright and the publishing company he works with. Is this more about money or telling the truth? If it were about the truth, then why only dedicate a few pages to the science of mind control and label is a "contested science"? It's almost as if he is saying that Hassan's work is questionable, which it most certainly is not.
In the video Hassan speaks about commercial advertisments being fed into our minds. He said that we don't realize that we are choosing to buy a certain product simply because we have seen an mentally suggesting ad 50 times. That's mind control and it should be illegal. I get the feeling like the secular world is in denial about the very existence of mind control. I would suspect this is the case because they employ a measure of mind control tactics themselves. The way they justify this is that people are free to choose, but that's not the case with mind control, not at all. There is ethical salesmanship and then there is unethical and then there is just downright mind control and emotional coercion. People generally want to believe that they ultimately are in full control of their decision making. The very idea of mind control stands in the face of that delusion about ourselves.
Hassan suggests that the reality of brainwashing is left an enigma in Going Clear, but I actually think Wright hints very strongly that it is a real and potent strategy that has been used to great effect for decades.
I believe what Hassan is saying is that the book should have been centered around mind control rather than "hinting" at it as you say. I suspect the reason for this is that the publishing company wants to make as much profit as possible. By making the book about "belief" instead of mind control science is essentially telling people what they want to hear.
I'm not all that sure what you mean about Wright "taking a shot at all religion" and "cursing belief in general."
There is a phenomenon that happens with a lot of people who leave cults. They have a realization that all religions employ similar tactics that were used on them. Because of this realization they then turn on the idea of religion and then on belief which is what religion is founded on. They simply say, "If we just stopped believing in extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence religion would cease to exist and the world would be better for it." Then they wage a campaign against God as the solution to all of life's problems. What is not realized, however, is that belief is human nature and will never go away. Therefore, belief in GOD will also always exist which means there will always be a percentage of people vulnerable to mind control tactics that play on that innate belief in God. To prevent against these attacks they don't need to stop believing in God, they need to be educated about the science of mind control. Not simply warned that religious scams exist. That's not enough information and history has proven that. People need in depth education as to how it all works and Scientology presents a lot of data to parse. It's very odd to me that the data is not being hashed out as vigorously as possible, which ultimately works to the favor of the cult. Cults want people to believe that people can withstand their methods because that means their victims will be unsuspecting. In reality mind control cannot be withstood without a proper education of the science. That's why they exist, because of ignorance. Wright didn't attack that aspect of the issue. I question that.
-Sab