"As Christian witnesses of Jehovah, her parents, Darrell and Rhoda Labrenz, correctly viewed blood transfusion as a violation of God's law and thus opposed it. They were concerned about their baby's eternal welfare, for everlasting life is the prospect only of those adhering to God's laws." Yearbook 1975 p.
explain to me how giving my baby blood would make the BABY accountable?
This is such a disgusting use of guilt to terrify parents into killing their child.
Any parent in the world would jump in front of a bus to save their child from death while sacrifcing their own. Yet as a parent, if you make this ultimate sacrifice for your child by giving them blood, that is, if you sacrifice your life (due to disobediece to WTS) in order to save the life of your baby (who is incapable of knowing what is going on) You are not making a sacfrifice to save your child because according to Watchtower you are dooming your child to eternal death.
Where this breaks exposes the hypocrisy of the WTS
Blood vs Rape
"Especially is this true since the Bible links abstinence from blood with such things as abstinence from fornication. Hence, since Christians would resist rape—a defiling sexual assault—so they would resist court-ordered blood transfusions—also a form of assault on the body." Watchtower 1980 Jun 15 p.23
Does this mean that if a despicable sexual deviant RAPED a baby that the baby would be doomed to eternal death for adultery??????
MESSAGE TO GOVERNING BODY - You are the sickets fucks on the planet. I wish hell existed so you could all burn there for eternity. Fuck you