I have many doubts about the Bible itself.
Many, many doubts. When I was JW, I’ve never questioned the Bible firmly believing in their brain washing. I came out from WTS because their lack of strict adherence to the Bible.
But… when I’ve started to read some more independent materials and started to use my own brain, some serious questions started to puzzle me a lot.
The biggest problem I have with the Bible is the fact that almost nothing there is written clearly and information’s the Bible contains are interpretable in many different ways. When I’m read reading the debate abut trinity or Jesus is God Jehovah or mere angel or son of God etc, I laugh hard at it, because… these debates are going on for almost 2000 years. The law has to be more specific and from God you would expect something more precise and logical than from the man. In the Bible is opposite. It’s a book full of contradictions, double meanings, and as whole
Book does not make a sense.
I have many problems with Jesus prophecies. They are not precise and the destruction of Jerusalem it could be just a fluke. “There will be wars and war news”
No one news in the Bible suggesting that the writer had any idea about today’s technology. (Compare with Mary Shipton.)
Also, I have posted few days ago another puzzle here, this time about apostle Peter.
“ http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/gospels/gospete.htm
1. Why his letters were inspired but Gospel was not?
2. Why his Gospel was not preserved by God as whole Gospel?
3. It's an evidence that he was cited in past. His witnessing
would be unreliable and not trust worthy?
4. That would means that Jesus has chosen wrong man?
5. Jesus knew abut Judas but, what about Peter?
Just wonder who can solve that little puzzle.”
No responses at all.
It looks to me that some guys while being high on something wrote some come cool stories, others were copying and these ones which we supported by others were included in whole writings and these ones which were conflicting, were rejected.
The same idea applying to Greek Scriptures. They seem to liked John, Mark, Matthew and Luke but they didn’t Peter, Thomas and perhaps many others so… they didn’t copied them and CC has compiled these texts into one part and… many people are debating about these texts for thousands of years!
Any Bible defenders here?
I want to know if I've missed something here. I’m searching for the truth like many others and the longer I’m searching, the worse it gets.