Interesting view on JW's by UN legal

by snare&racket 6 Replies latest jw friends

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    A recently deceased human right worker Howard Clark who worked for Watchtower co rights, remembered....

    "I knew Howard basically on the C.O. issues which had become an agenda item at the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, which met in Geneva. However, as countries dropped conscription in favor of a professional military or developed alternatives to military service, the only C.O. s left were members of the Watchtower Society (Jehovah’s Witnesses), whose theology seemed strange to Howard, all the more so that in some Watchtower publications, the returning Jesus seems less nonviolent than the first time around! Since I have worked on freedom of conscience and belief in U.N. human rights bodies, I have had many contacts with Jehovah’s Witnesses, explaining to them that I was not into reading the Book of Daniel or Revelations, but I would defend their right to have Kingdom Halls in Central Asia."

    http://forusa.org/blogs/rene-wadlow/memoriam-howard-clark/12709

  • fiddler
    fiddler

    He saw it clearly it seems.........the JW's and their interpretation of Jesus and biblical 'revelations' about the future were anything BUT non-violent. JW's obviously didn't fit in with any peaceful movements as he saw them and so they were just an interesting inigma to him but not a belief system worth delving into any further.

    Logical man! May HE RIP.

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    The irony of such a good man doing so much for Watchtower as they preached the destruction of mankind for not having their beliefs, including Mr Clark.

    What an awful doctrinal system we once observed.

  • FadeToBlack
    FadeToBlack

    Love that classic JW artwork. But shouldn't the car be a 'selfish' 2 seater? The car they used, looks like my old CO's Buick Century!

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    I like how there is a bloke willing to shoot god or jesus ha ha ha 'you evil bastards!'

  • SnailsPace2
    SnailsPace2

    Hahha. That "two seater" comment reminded me a public talk recently. The brother was from a different hall and apparently didn't realize (or maybe he did) that most in our hall were pretty well off or like to give the impression of it. His big illustration about the snares of materialism consisted of a person's decision to purchase a new car or not. I kept waiting for him to say something about "is the car a two-seater and not suitable for service? Or is a luxury model that guzzles gas" but he never did. He just left it at "new car" so apparently we should only be buying used cars now. . . . I bought a new car a few months ago

  • FadeToBlack
    FadeToBlack

    @snare: Perhaps he thought aliens were attacking. He did not get the memo that everyone would know it was Yahweh. So many strange things about this. Back to the car - what happened to the interior? Maybe it was already being used as some kind of flop house? The guy in the black leather pants or the unemployed grad-student (glasses and ski-cap) may have been living there (maybe together).

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit