Surrogate mothers commit adultery?

by crownboy 7 Replies latest jw friends

  • crownboy
    crownboy

    Most people on this site already know that the JW religion has some really quirky beliefs. Some can be silly, but unfortunately others dangerous. I find the JW belief on the properness of surrogate mothers to be rather silly.

    *** w84 8/15 26 Insight on the News ***
    Surrogate Mothers
    A case of human artificial insemination was recorded
    as long ago as 1799. But in recent years this has come
    to be more widely practiced. According to The New York
    Times, a woman who is artificially inseminated and
    bears a child for another woman, as a substitute for
    her, is called a surrogate mother. The infertile wife
    and her husband agree to this arrangement, and when
    the surrogate mother gives birth the baby is adopted
    by the couple. The sperm in this case could be from
    the husband of the couple or from another donor.
    Although such an arrangement may be approved by many
    in the world, the Christian rightfully asks whether it
    is in harmony with God’s laws. The Bible, at Leviticus
    18:20, is clear on this point when it says: “You must
    not give your emission as semen to the wife of your
    associate to become unclean by it.” Artificial
    insemination of a woman by a donor other than her
    legal husband, makes her guilty of adultery, a sin
    against God. (Deuteronomy 5:18) The sperm donor and
    the surrogate woman have not been yoked together by
    God in matrimony.—Matthew 19:4-6.
    They couldn't seriously believe this crap, could they? Something as intimately impersonal as the above procedure is considered "adultery"? Besides the obvious fact that Christains aren't under the Jewish law (but apparently under the "priniciples" [8>] ), the situation referred to there has nothing to do with surrogate motherhood. That scripture was referring to two people having an illicit affair, and bearing an illegitimate child. In the surrogate mothers case, she is neither having an affair nor is the child "illegitimate". In fact, back in bible times, there were people who served as "surrogate mothers" (wives giving their maidservants to bare children). Why not use that "bible principle"? Just one of countless cases of the GB sticking its nose where it doesn't belong, and not using clear, realistic thinking either.

    IT'S MY 200TH POST!!!!

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere
    Christians are under the law of the Christ, not the Mosaic Law. (1 Cor. 9:21)
    p152, Unit 6b - Pay Attention Book

    The Bible, at Leviticus 18:20, is clear on this point when it says: “You must not give your emission as semen to the wife of your associate to become unclean by it.”
    *** w84 8/15 26 Insight on the News ***

    Such Liars!

    "As every one knows, there are mistakes in the Bible" - The Watchtower, April 15, 1928, p. 126
    Believe in yourself, not mythology.
    <x ><

  • LDH
    LDH

    Yes, honor the HOLY SPERM at all costs.

    I find it odd that the article states:

    Artificial
    insemination of a woman by a donor other than her
    legal husband, makes her guilty of adultery, a sin
    against God
    and yet there is no reference to the man who has willingly proffered his sperm.

    They can kiss my ass.

    Lisa
    EGG class

  • RunningMan
    RunningMan

    Thanks for the quote. This one's a beut. It's going strait into the archives.

  • LDH
    LDH

    And where is that recent quote that says the WBTS do not 'make rules' beyond what is in the Bible?

    Bullshit.

    A girlfriend of mine does not ovulate, and two weeks ago I mentioned egg donation to my husband, and we are looking in to doing it. I would be honored to provide THE means by which a couple could have a child.

    Hell, I would even be a surrogate but I hate being pregnant.

    Lisa

  • D8TA
    D8TA

    ***runs down to local sperm bank****

    ***runs back to Judicial comitee a month later***

    Me: Well boys! Due to your interpretation of scripture, I have just commited adultry 350 times in the past 30 days. With 350 different women, some may be lesbians too! And guess what? They're all pregnant! And I never had to get in the sack. Oh, what's that you ask? Did I "penetrate". Why NO! Not at all! I was, according to your definition of sex, was having it without me even being there. WOO HOO! Whoze da man! Whoze da man!

    D8TA

  • rmayer32
    rmayer32

    Just another way to control. What assholes!

    -Rick

  • Scully
    Scully

    Watchtower Logic™ is just grand because it works against them. Get a load of this:

    A woman who becomes artificially inseminated commits adultery (if married) or fornication (if unmarried). In the interests of equality, the male party is guilty of the same "crimes" when he donates his sperm for the purpose of artificial insemination.

    In other words, when you apply the WTS's logic, Mary was an adulteress (she was betrothed to Joseph) when she became pregnant with Jesus. Because the Bible claims that God is the father of Jesus, then that would make Jehovah a fornicator. The WTS version of the Bible also says that Jesus is God's son. Which means that "God's son" Jesus was an illegitimate child, or a "bastard" if you will.

    Ain't Watchtower Logic™ just beeeeyoouuuuteeefull??

    Love, Scully


Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit