Jehovahs Witnesses Tax Exemption in Fishkill, more burden on taxpayers without any benefit to the community..

by defender of truth 9 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • defender of truth
    defender of truth

    www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/story/news/local/2015/05/12/jehovahs-witnesses-fishkill-tax-exemption/27206609/

    FISHKILL – The Jehovah's Witnesses have obtained a partial tax exemption for the Rivercrest luxury apartments that the religious group bought last year, and have now purchased an adjacent waterfront property, both in the Town of Fishkill.

    The effect on taxpayers is a shift of the burden for the lost taxes to all other taxpaying shoulders, plus a probable increase in that shift next year. The loss so far to the town is about $55,000, with other sums snipped from the tax bases of the Beacon City School District, the Chelsea Fire District and Dutchess County.

    THE POUGHKEEPSIE JOURNAL

    Jehovah's Witnesses eye buying Fishkill site for church complex
    The two properties sit next to each other in the Brockway section of the town, overlooking the Hudson River and west of Route 9D.

    Rivercrest apartments is a 250-unit luxury rental complex that the town's assessor values at $31 million. The two waterfront parcels are 57.4 acres of land and empty industrial buildings that are valued at $1 million each that were bought from Chelsea Waterfront Development LLC.

    Town Supervisor Bob LaColla said the Witnesses have a vision for the old industrial land. "They called to say they're still planning on coming in with a plan for the old Circle M site." That's the long-gone company that operated a wood-treatment plant there.

    No comment was forthcoming from the Witnesses headquarters. The group's property dealings are under the name of Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. LaColla said the group's representatives have spoken of building an assembly hall, a video production studio and three office buildings there.

    Calculations based on the deed indicate a likely sale price of $6 million.
    Chelsea Waterfront Development was set up by AVR Realty, headed by Allan V. Rose, who signed the sale deed for Chelsea Waterfront. AVR bought extensive properties in the area and has been building it up or selling portions.

    In December, Watchtower bought the 250-unit Rivercrest apartments. Tenants told the Poughkeepsie Journal that the new owner would not renew rental leases, leading to a surge of relocations. LaColla said the Witnesses then began moving their own members into units that were vacated.

    By March 1, the date by which an owner must apply for exemptions, the society claimed a religious exemption for 44 percent of the property. LaColla explained that this was the proportion of units that had been reoccupied by members of Jehovah's Witnesses.

    "They moved members into the units," he said. "Their model is along the lines of a monastery. They take a vow of poverty and are in full service to the church."
    The complex, however, is hardly monastic. It has been one of the more deluxe rentals in southern Dutchess and has rented at some of the highest rates. Despite the assessment, the Watchtower apparently paid $57 million for it, based on calculations from the transfer tax on the deed.

    The remainder of Rivercrest units are or were still under lease to non-members who had made their homes there when it was a standard, market-rate apartment complex.
    LaColla said the town's assessor, Christian Harkins, has no choice in the matter, given the state laws that allow tax exemption for properties that are used for religious purposes and are owned by a qualified religious organization.

    "He complies with state regulations on that," he said. The town, he said, is not quite standing still and officials are concerned. "We are promoting a conversation with our state representatives to look at state policy regarding tax-exempt properties, the exemption policy itself," LaColla said.

    The exact amount of impact exemptions would have on taxes can't yet be calculated, LaColla said. A clearer picture should emerge after June 1. An official of the Beacon schools has previously said that a full exemption on the apartments could remove $800,000 in revenue from that source. But when that happens, the loss is made up by shifting it to all other taxpayers.

  • defender of truth
    defender of truth

    If anyone wants to try to take action regarding Watchtower's tax exempt status (why not just give it a go?), this thread has a possible way to go about it..

    According to the blog, anyone can file a complaint with the IRS. American citizenship is not required!

    If you are afraid of retaliation from the WTBTS or being shunned by JWs make sure to check the box marked "I am concerned that I might face retaliation or retribution if my identity is disclosed". I wonder if the other box could be checked to complain about how the Watchtower uses "undue influence" on members and promotes it being used on members and ex-members.

    Now, how many JWN members would take the time to fill out form 13909 without disclosing their identify? A hand full?

    www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/235110001/how-complain-irs-about-non-profits

    If you think that there is no point in even trying to do something, and the IRS will never act, here's an interesting quote:

    It isn’t so far-fetched an idea, either. The Nonprofit Risk Management Center reports that more than 100 501(c)(3) organizations are stripped of their tax-exempt status each year. The reasons can vary, covering the violation of laws that govern private benefits, lobbying, political campaign activity, unrelated business income, the obligation to report annually and maintaining operation in accord with stated exempt purpose.

    www.thewrap.com/hbos-going-clear-reignites-scrutiny-of-scientologys-tax-exempt-status/

    At the very least filing a few complaints couldn't do any harm, could it?

    I'll leave it with you good people. Thanks for reading ;)

  • stuckinarut2
    stuckinarut2

    And it for reasons like this that the latest "broadcasting" has such a push for more donations!

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    "The Nonprofit Risk Management Center reports that more than 100 501(c)(3) organizations are stripped of their tax-exempt status each year. The reasons can vary, covering the violation of laws that govern private benefits, lobbying, political campaign activity, unrelated business income, the obligation to report annually and maintaining operation in accord with stated exempt purpose.."

    Damn, I didn't know that; so much for the dismissive statement (can't remember by who) that the WTS could "never" lose their tax-exempt status.

    Guess we shouldn't be too surprised, though; you don't f**k with the IRS; these are the guys who took down Capone.

    x

    In fact, now that I think about it, this could be another means by which the Legal System could "make an example" of a known group (besides Scientology) who is egregiously abusing its tax-exempt status (in addition to institutionalized sex abuse).

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    Don't forget that during the "historic" first ever RC, Gerrit Loesch droned on for what seemed like an eternity, and then mentioned "charity" for a few minutes.

    The JWs have NEVER, EVER mentioned "charity", except when referring to the preaching work. They want to save their charitable status and the tax benefits that come with it.

    DD

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    Data-Dog - "The JWs have NEVER, EVER mentioned 'charity', except when referring to the preaching work. They want to save their charitable status and the tax benefits that come with it."

    Which begs the question, why would they be worried about the WT's tax-exempt status if the WT wasn't at risk of losing its tax-exempt status?

  • yodastar
    yodastar
    And they claim to represent the one and only true god? Makes you sick to realise they are yet another very very rich church. Next thing they will have their own little city as well.
  • defender of truth
    defender of truth
    Can anyone please explain what all this means? (In relation to getting the IRS to hopefully examine the Watchtower organisation)..

    "The term integrated auxiliary of a church refers to a class of organizations that are related to a church or convention or association of churches, but are not such organizations themselves. "
    www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Churches-&-Religious-Organizations/Integrated-Auxiliary-of-a-Church--Defined

    The restrictions on church enquiries "do not apply to integrated auxiliaries of a church."
    Also..
    "They do not apply to related persons or organizations."
    http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Churches-&-Religious-Organizations/Restrictions-on-Church-Inquiries-and-Examinations

    There is more information here:
    http://blog.cricpa.com/index.php/2015/04/21/churches-are-different-to-the-irs-special-rules-limiting-irs-audit-authority/
  • defender of truth
    defender of truth
    (Please see question in previous post before reading this)

    " To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual."
    www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Charitable-Organizations/Exemption-Requirements-Section-501%28c%29%283%29-Organizations

    "The term charitable is used in its generally accepted legal sense and includes:
    relief of the poor, the distressed, or the underprivileged; advancement of religion; advancement of education or science; erecting or maintaining public buildings, monuments, or works; lessening the burdens of government; lessening neighborhood tensions; eliminating prejudice and discrimination; defending human and civil rights secured by law; and combating community deterioration and juvenile delinquency."
    www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Charitable-Organizations/Exempt-Purposes-Internal-Revenue-Code-Section-501(c)(3)

    ......

    The Searcher made this point on another thread:

    " Giving people free literature/studies of a religion's beliefs, should not, and does not merit charitable status!

    A close scrutiny by the IRS/HMRC into such money-making entities will quickly establish whose lives are being improved more substantially from the donations/business practices - the ones running the 'charity', or people who are genuinely in need of day-day necessities and care. "


    Interesting point.
    Note one of the violations, on the form, that the IRS would be interested in hearing about:
    " NATURE OF VIOLATION: Directors/ officers/persons are using income/assets or personal gain "
    ... I wonder if there may be evidence of this somewhere?

    Anyway, I'm just going to leave you all with the form to send, if you know that the Governing Body use any funds/assets for their own personal gain, or if you have any evidence that not all the funds/assets of the organisation are used for 'advancement of religion'.

    The address to send it to is on there, and the IRS will confirm that they have received your complaint by letter. The form states that you can check a box if you are concerned about your identity being disclosed. It also states that you can put 'Anonymous' instead of your name.

    This is the form:
    www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f13909.pdf
  • defender of truth

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit