Enigma said- I have been thinking about basic theology a lot and the more i think about it the more rediculous it sounds.
It is, and you really don't need to go beyond Genesis to see that it's all a load of Fruit Loops.
Enigma asked- So Adam and Eve died from a small sin of eating a piece of fruit. If sin causes death why is Satan not dead?
Technically, Satan doesn't even appear in the story: that's a later Xian doctrinal interpretation that's inserted, saying the serpent is symbolic for Satan. Jews have never seen the serpent to be anything but the cleverest of the "beasts of the field", likely done to later justify use of animals (beasts of the field) for sacrificial purposes to atone for the sins of humans.
Besides that, Satan is supposedly an immortal being, not mortal; hence, he doesn't experience mortality (death).
Enigma asked- Why didnt adam and eve die that very day like god said?
Yeah, the time frame shifts, since the serpent says "the day you eat from the fruit, your eyes will be opened" and that occurred the same day to Adam and Eve. OT and NT authors tried to cover for God's lie ("The DAY you eat from the fruit, you shall positively die") saying that a day to God is 1,000 yrs to mankind, so God wasn't speaking in HUMAN days, but referring to days in Heavenly Standard Time. M'kay....
Either that excuse, OR, the JWs claim it was a 'spiritual death' only, with Adam being cut off and removed from God's presence (as they claim DFed individuals are), so basically Adam and Eve were as good as dead, the walking dead.
Enigma asked- Why punish a snake if it was just being used by satan? Would adam and eve have died from sinning if they ate from the tree of life first?
The serpent was serving as a representative member of his group ("beasts of the field": apparently ancient Jews thought of reptiles as members of same group that includes mammals (like sheep and cows), when they all belong to the Animal Kingdom, along with homo sapiens). Likely done to excuse use of animals for sacrifices (AKA blaming the victims, saying they brought it upon themselves; as seen in the original sin concept, Hebrews had no problem with inherited debt, whether mankind inheriting original sin of Adam, or all animals inheriting the original sin of the serpent).
The broader perspective though is the story serves as an explanation of how ancient listeners got to where they were, with the tale serving literally as their 'origins myth', telling them the story of their ancient past. If the story didn't do that, then it would've failed to serve its purpose.
Enigma asked- Is Satan still perfect if he disobeys god? Did humans make the first sin?
"Perfect" is a Xian insertion into the Hebrew account: Jews didn't think of the first pair as "perfect", and the word doesn't appear in the Hebrew story.
The account (esp the Xian interpretation) has more holes in it than Swiss cheese, a few of the continuity errors which are discussed here:
http://awgue.weebly.com/the-paradox-of-adam-and-eve-and-how-the-new-world-translation-fruitlessly-attempts-to-keep-it-hidden.html