Monday and Tuesday, the United Nations Committee Against Torture will question the Vatican about its record on child sexual violence.

by Sol Reform 9 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    Monday and Tuesday, the United Nations Committee Against Torture will question the Vatican about its record on child sexual violence.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au3ZwOOwGvs

    Watch live: CCR Reports on Vatican Hearing at UN Posted on May 3, 2014 Greetings from Geneva where, this Monday and Tuesday, the United Nations Committee Against Torture will question the Vatican about its record on child sexual violence.

    This is the second time this year the Vatican has been called by an international body to account for its handling of the crisis of sexual violence throughout the Catholic Church. CCR will be there again with our clients, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), to attend the proceedings and report back to survivors, advocates, and supporters via livestream.

    Tune in to our report-back on Tuesday, May 6, at 8:30 pm CET (2:30 pm EST).

    You can follow the global conversation about this historic hearing on Twitter using the hashtag #VaticanAccountability and ask questions before or during the report-back by tweeting to the hashtag or emailing your questions to[email protected].

    We will answer as many as possible during the livestream. Throughout the world, children and vulnerable adults have been and continue to be subjected to widespread and systemic rape and sexual violence by priests and others associated with the Roman Catholic Church.

    The Vatican’s policies and practices enable this violence. The Committee Against Torture has been clear that rape and sexual violence constitute forms of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

    In April, SNAP and CCR submitted reports to the Committee, detailing how the Vatican has violated the core principles of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment, which it ratified in 2002.

    The hearings will be streamed live here. From 10 am-12 pm CET (4 am-6 am EST) on Monday, May 5th, the Committee will question the Vatican on its compliance with the Convention. From 3 pm-6 pm CET (9 am-12 pm EST) on Tuesday, May 6th, the Vatican will respond to the Committee’s questions.

    Both broadcasts will be in English. For more information on our efforts to hold the Vatican accountable see our webpage and factsheet.

    http://masteradrian.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/watch-live-ccr-reports-on-vatican-hearing-at-un/

    Opus Dei (PR Beast) threatens United Nations Committee on Torture; says “U.N. Committee best keep in mind that the world is watching”!

    May 2, 2014 Today in preparation for the Vatican to be interrogated by the United Nations Committee on the Convention against Torture (because the Opus Dei owns the global media with Murdoch),

    it used the National Review in the US to threaten the UN, especially in this phrase: “…as people with varying degrees of interest and devotion stream in and out of St. Peter’s Square… the United Nations Committee Against Torture will soon be hearing testimony from and about the Holy See. The Holy See will testify voluntarily... And the U.N. Committee best keep in mind that the world is watching.

    http://pope-francis-con-christ.blogspot.ca/2014/02/opus-dei-pr-beast-threatens-united.html

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    https://twitter.com/katherga1/status/462263923572748289/photo/1

    SNAP statement to UN Committee Against Torture

    For immediate release: Friday, May 2, 2014

    Statement by Barbara Blaine of Chicago, president of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (European cell +39 366 1160224, U.S. cell +1 312 399 4747, Rome hotel- +39 06 598591; [email protected])

    First, we humbly ask that you keep in mind that we are convinced that hundreds of innocent children and vulnerable adults are being sexually violated, tortured and assaulted - right now, today - by Catholic clerics. Second, we ask that you keep in mind that torture and violence can be subtle and manipulative. Or it can be blatant and brutal. Either way, it's horribly destructive to the human spirit, especially when inflicted on the young by the powerful, on the truly devout by the allegedly “holy.”

    For 25 years, we in SNAP have tirelessly tried – using every means and methods we could imagine - to get Catholic officials to stop clergy child rapes and sexual violence. We have tried every tactic we could, from politely writing to and speaking with Cardinals, bishops and other church officials, to meeting with panels and committees established by dioceses, religious communities and national bishops’ conferences, to speaking at parish and public forums and begging parishioners to speak up. We have held demonstrations and passed out flyers in all weather conditions in hundreds of cities in dozens of countries. We have written letters to the editors in newspapers, met with police agencies, prosecutors and lawmakers.

    Nothing has succeeded in getting Vatican officials to stop this violence. But keep in mind: kids are being assaulted and lives are being wrecked, while Catholic officials split hairs and make technical claims, ducking, dodging and denying responsibility in this forum as they have done for decades in other forums. We are grateful for this opportunity to address you. You see just a few of us here. But there are hundreds of thousands of us who have had our innocence shattered by being raped and sexually violated by Catholic employees who commit and conceal heinous crimes against children.

    We belong to a growing global community of victims of torture, sexual violence and rape called the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests or SNAP. We were founded in 1988 with the simple mission to heal the wounded and to protect the innocent. Barbara Blaine is the founder and president of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. She is a survivor of child sexual violence by a priest. She is a social worker, attorney and holds graduate degrees in Law, Theology and Social Work.

    In our early days we naively thought church officials would do the right thing. We assumed their callous and reckless response to us was borne of ignorance and inexperience. We thought bishops were cruel to us because they did not know any better. After numerous attempts to explain how they deepened our already painful wounds we began to recognize that they understood all too well. They knew but they did not care. Their concerns were with protecting our perpetrators and reputations not with protecting other children or assisting in our healing. For most of us enduring the torture, rape and sexual violence was almost unbearable. We know you understand the devastating and potentially life-long consequences.

    This has broken so many of us, shattered our dreams and goals for our futures, alienated us from loved ones and peers, left us suffering from mental illness, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety diseases and enslaved to addictions and eating disorders. But the betrayal by church officials was just as damaging and for many, even worse than that of the sexual violence. Those in positions of trust to whom we were taught were closest to God and revered above anyone else including respected teachers, community leaders, politicians, physicians and even our parents, treat us as enemies when we muster enough courage to report the rape and sexual violence we have endured. Rather than being embraced, appreciated and acknowledged we are ostracized, ignored and blamed.

    This adds additional torture to far too many. As children, most of assumed we were at fault. We did not have knowledge that we were victims of crimes. We did not have the vocabulary to tell what was happening to us. We felt and were helpless to stop it. We assumed we were “the only ones.” The church employees who raped us were revered in our communities and families. As children, we were taught to respect and obey church officials.

    The Catholic clerics off who were charged with our care and well-being were the very ones who abused their positions, power and prestige, by actually raping us or covering up for the rapists. As Catholics we are taught that we need to remain in God’s grace or we will be damned for all eternity. Besides the spiritual alienation and fear of going to hell, the practical experience is that when victims report the crimes we are no longer welcome in our communities which breaks family ties, forces our children to locate to new schools, takes away many of our social connections because so much of our lives are tied to Catholic parishes, schools and other institutions.

    The Vatican minimizes the harm caused and pretends that the problem has been corrected and that sexual violence and rape does not happen today in the church. But the evidence that continues to be exposed tells that is simply not true. This brave young women sitting next to me was raped by a priest in her small Minnesota town only a few years ago. She bravely spoke up and filed criminal and civil charges. But her perpetrator, Fr. Joseph Jeyapaul, went to India and is now fighting extradition back to the US. While in India, church officials assigned him to oversee schools, even though they knew of the charges he faced.

    The report we presented outlines many more examples of current and recent cases. Just last month, for instance, Italy's bishops declared they will not insist that priests report known and suspected child sex abuse to secular authorities. And even now, Vatican officials are harboring a Polish archbishop who is wanted by law enforcement for molesting children. Francis' top aides refuse to extradite the accused abuser. Vatican officials have the ability to stop the sexual violence but refuse to do so. They still deny fostering sexual violence which results in violating the integrity, body and spirit of countless people across the globe.

    If they were sincere, they would act. They would immediately fire the offending priests, nuns, bishops and brothers who are credibly accused of committing sex crimes. They would punish the bishops who transfer and cover up for predators and honor whistle- blowers instead of firing them. They would turn over their files to police. These simple acts would protect hundreds of thousands of children across the globe immediately. Our organization now has over 18,000 members from 79 different countries.

    We continue to hear from more victims almost every day. We come from different nations and generations, with different languages and cultures. But we all seem to know and understand each other because our experiences are so similar. We all know the searing, scorching pain of losing our dignity and innocence through sexual violence at the hands of the most revered in our communities. But we also have almost identical experiences when we muster the courage to report our crimes to church officials.

    By and large we are treated as enemies, discouraged from speaking up, accused of exaggerations, blamed for our own victimization, told we are the first victims to report, and promised that remedies will be taken. Based on decades of evidence, we firmly believe this is the direct result of Vatican practices that permit, excuse and cover up sexual violence within the clergy. The small number of Catholic groups who attack United Nations panels do not deserve to be taken seriously. Only if they acknowledged and worked to end the sexual violence would they warrant attention.

    These disingenuous critics deliberately confuse belief and behavior. Belief is sacrosanct. Behavior is prescribed. Anyone can believe anything. Anyone cannot do anything. When Catholic clerics are prosecuted for breaking secular laws on child rape, child pornography or indecent exposure, they often challenge the legality or constitutionality of those laws. When Catholic officials are prosecuted for breaking secular laws, like those on child endangerment, they defend themselves by claiming immunity because of religious beliefs.

    Sadly, in many cases, complicit Catholic officials attack individuals or institutions that expose and criticize Catholic sexual violence and complicity, whether these are victims, witnesses, whistleblowers or police, prosecutors, journalists or other secular bodies. We saw it in 2005, when Philadelphia Cardinal Justin Rigali's aides blasted prosecutors for allegedly being "anti-Catholic" after a grand jury report was issued.

    1 We saw it in 2002, when Honduran Cardinal Oscar Maradiaga said, that The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Boston Globe are ''protagonists of . . .a persecution against the church,'' covering the abuse scandal with ''a fury which reminds me of the times of Stalin and Hitler.''

    2 We saw it in 2010, when 'papal preacher' Fr. Raniero Cantalamessa likened accusations against the pope and the Catholic church in the sex abuse scandal to “a collective violence suffered by the Jews” (according to the Associated Press.)

    3 We see it time and time and time again, when Catholic officials overtly or subtly blame victims or their advocates. New York's Fr. Benedict Groeschel said “a youngster comes after (a priest). A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer.”

    4 The Catholic hierarchy treat these international treaties like they treat their own rarely-enforced policies on sexual violence: as public relations vehicles to enhance their reputations, not as serious commitments to be faithfully honored. This charade must stop.

    The Catholic hierarchy has virtually never complained about the United Nations process when it was less rigorous or was favorable to church officials. Now, for the first time, UN panels are addressing, in a fair and forthright way, the continuing sexual violence and cover ups in the church.

    And now, apologists for the Vatican cry foul. In March 2014, Francis claimed Catholic officials are being unfairly singled out for criticism on abuse. He said “No-one else has done more. Yet the church is the only one to have been attacked.”

    5 That was disingenuous and self-serving. Now, Francis' top aides gripe that UN committees – made up of experienced and caring volunteer experts – aren't treating church officials fairly. These complaints are just as disingenuous and self serving. The Vatican’s new commission on sexual abuse is meeting today.

    This gives an untrue impression that if Vatican officials had more information they would do the right thing. In fact, they hold sufficient information right now to act yet they refuse to do so. In February, the Committee on the Rights of the Child made recommendations to Vatican officials about children's safety. The Vatican has yet to enact even one of them or make promises to “study them carefully.”

    6 We do not oppose clergy sexual violence because we dislike church practices like singing during Mass. We oppose clergy sexual violence because it is devastating to the lives of those who are assaulted by priests, nuns, bishops, brothers, seminarians and Catholic lay employees.

    We don't object to widespread cover ups of clergy sexual violence because we object to Catholic fundraising strategies.We object to widespread cover ups of clergy sexual violence because they enable even more clergy sexual violence. Please do not let them continue to endanger children and dodge accountability. Thank you.

    http://www.snapnetwork.org/snap_statement_to_un_committee_against_torture

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    Authoritarian regimes (large and small) will always - always - have a problem with the institutionalized sexual victimization of young people; it's an overlooked but fundamentally inherent aspect of them, due to the manner in which they're structured and administered.

    The only way a regime can prevent it internally is to embrace financial and policy transparency, utilize and respect the democratic process, acknowledge the discoveries of science and history regardless of the implications, and foster positive community activism...

    ..in other words, stop being an authoritarian regime.

    Anybody see that happening to the RCC any time soon (or, more close to home, the WTS)?

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://m.myfoxal.com/#!/newsDetail/25426440

    At UN, Vatican seeks limit on abuse responsibility Updated: 05/05/2014 6:21 am GMT-0400

    By JOHN HEILPRIN Associated Press GENEVA (AP) - In its second grilling at the United Nations this year, the Vatican on Monday sought to limit its responsibility for the global priest sex abuse scandal by undercutting arguments it has violated an international treaty against torture and inhuman treatment.....

    The grilling ended after just two hours Monday to allow the Vatican delegation to prepare responses when the hearing resumes Tuesday afternoon. Tomasi acknowledged there remain differences over "the line of legal and moral responsibility" for implementing the treaty.

    He said there has been a "stabilization, even a decline in case of pedophilia" in the church, which indicates that the measures taken by the Holy See and local churches are "bringing about a positive result." "The church has to do its own cleaning of the house.

    It has been doing it for the last 10 years," he said. A U.N. committee that monitors a key treaty on children's rights blasted the Holy See in January, accusing it of systematically placing its own interests over those of victims by enabling priests to rape and molest tens of thousands of children through its own policies and code of silence. And that committee rejected a similar argument the Vatican made trying to limit its responsibility.

    If a U.N. committee finds the abuse amounts to torture and inhuman treatment, that could open the floodgates to abuse lawsuits dating back decades because there are no statute of limitations on torture cases, said Katherine Gallagher, a human rights attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, a nonprofit legal group based in New York. The group submitted reports on behalf of victims to both committees urging closer U.N. scrutiny of the church record on child abuse.

    Gallagher said that rape legally can constitute a form of torture because of the elements of intimidation, coercion, and exploitation of power, and that it is a "disingenuous argument" for the Vatican to assert its only responsibility for the anti-torture treaty lies within Vatican City.

    When they signed the treaty, Vatican officials said they were only doing so on behalf of Vatican City not the Holy See, which is the governing structure of the universal church.

    The Vatican's spokesman, Rev. Federico Lombardi, told Vatican Radio on Friday the church hopes the U.N. committee reviewing the anti-torture treaty will avoid being "reduced to tools of ideological pressure rather than a necessary stimulus towards the desired progress in promoting respect for human rights."

    But the stakes couldn't be higher, said Barbara Blaine, president of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, known as SNAP. She said hundreds of children are still being abused today despite the Vatican's recent "lofty words" that don't amount to preventive action.
  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-center-for-constitutional-rights/understanding-clergy-sexu_b_5275701.html

    May 6, 2014 Huffpost Religion Edition: U.S.

    Understanding Clergy Sexual 'Abuse' as Torture Posted: 05/06/2014 4:12 pm EDT

    Updated: 29 minutes ago By Pam Spees, Senior Staff Attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights

    On Monday and Tuesday, a United Nations committee in Geneva asked the Vatican very tough questions about its track record on preventing and punishing acts of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. The Committee Against Torture and international human rights law have long understood rape and sexual violence as forms of torture because, as one international tribunal observed, rape "strikes at the very core of human dignity and physical integrity." Most of the Committee's questioning was directed to the Vatican's handling of widespread and systemic sexual violence by clergy.

    While some Vatican officials have suggested that the church is being singled out for special treatment, the Vatican in fact submitted itself to the Committee's oversight when it chose to ratify the treaty in 2002. Committee members made it clear they were asking of the Vatican nothing more and nothing less than they ask of other countries that have ratified the treaty.

    When the Vatican filed its initial report a decade late, it made no mention of the widespread and systemic sexual violence within the church. As has historically been the case with revelations about clergy sexual violence, it was survivors and advocates who had to force the issue to the surface. The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), represented by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), submitted reports which document the fact of the widespread sexual violence, the policies and practices of the Vatican that enable and foster such acts, and the depth of the harm that results.

    A key feature of torture is the gravity of the harm resulting from the ill-treatment - harm that includes both physical and mental suffering. The experiences of members of SNAP, which started out as a small support group of survivors in the United States 25 years ago and now counts 18,000 members in 79 different countries, bear out what studies have shown for some time: the harms caused by sexual violence by clergy are often severe and life-long and, in many cases, life-threatening. Some studies indicate rates of attempted suicide are as much as 12 times higher for people who experienced sexual violence as children than those who had not.

    As one member of the Committee noted today, commissions of inquiry and other investigations into clergy sexual violence have documented this pattern: A commission in Belgium reported at least 13 people were believed to have committed suicide as a result of the sexual assaults by clerics; A commission in Australia was established in the midst of controversy surrounding news reports that at least 40 people who had been reportedly sexually assaulted by clergy had committed suicide.

    A police investigation suggested that church officials had known about the linkages but had chosen to remain silent. In Kansas City, a police investigation linked five suicides of young men to the sexual assaults they endured at the hands of one priest. In addition to the elevated risk of suicide, research has shown that adult survivors of childhood sexual violence are far more likely to experience acute and chronic mental health issues such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Dissociative Identity Disorder, major depression, and severe anxiety.

    More recent research indicates that traumatic stress caused by childhood sexual violence can even cause neurological damage and changes in brain function. Other studies suggest increased risk of other health problems, including increased risk of cancer. The context of clergy sexual violence carries with it a particularly insidious and devastating kind of harm given the betrayal of trust and profound significance of religious authority, with priests and bishops held out as God's "representatives." Manfred Nowak, a former UN expert on torture, emphasized the impact that religious authority can have in these situations when he observed that torture is often an exploitation of powerlessness and that rape is an "extreme expression of this power relation, of one person treating another person as merely an object."

    The Australian commission noted that the harm of sexual violence is exacerbated when the perpetrator enjoys a position of "high moral standing" as priests and others associated with the church often do. A grand jury in Philadelphia observed after a lengthy investigation into clergy sexual violence that "the human toll of the Archdiocesan policies is staggering."

    It found that not only had children "suffered the horror of being sexually assaulted by priests" but were then "victimized a second time by an Archdiocesan administration that in many cases ignored, minimized or attempted to conceal their abuse." Considering the severity and often lifelong harm combined with the ongoing and pervasive sexual violence by clergy around the world and still-mounting evidence of cover-ups by higher-level church officials, it is striking that Pope Francis responded to earlier criticism by another UN Committee - the Committee on the Rights of the Child - that the church is "the only public institution to have acted with transparency and responsibility" and that "no-one else has done more."

    Perhaps Pope Francis should confer with the families of those who did not survive their sexual assaults by Catholic clergy and the church's treatment of the families in the aftermath, or those whose lives have been derailed by PTSD and other physical and mental illnesses as a result, before asserting something so demonstrably false and self-serving. As the commission in Australia found just last November: The Catholic Church minimized and trivialized the problem; contributed to abuse not being disclosed, or not being responded to... ensured that the Victorian community remained uninformed of the abuse; and ensured that perpetrators were not held accountable with the tragic result being that children continued to be abused.

    We found that today's church leaders view the current question of abuse of children as a 'short term embarrassment', which should be handled as quickly as possible to cause the least damage to the church's standing. They do not see the problems as raising questions about the church's own culture. Church officials attacked the recent findings of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child that the church had systematically placed its own interests over the best interests of children to be free from sexual violence as "prejudiced."

    As it did before the Committee on the Rights of the Child in January, Vatican representatives today tried to limit their responsibility under the Convention Against Torture to acts occurring within the tiny confines of Vatican City State - blaming other governments for failing to protect children and vulnerable adults from clergy sexual violence on their territories. International law and the committee of experts are clear that the obligations under the Convention do not end at the border of any state but extend beyond their territories, particularly when agents acting on behalf of a state are involved in perpetrating or acquiescing in the perpetration of crimes like torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

    Last week, Vatican spokesperson Federico Lombardi was already urging the UN Committee Against Torture not "to bring the issue of the sexual abuse of minors into the discussion on torture" - once again minimizing the lived realities of survivors and the severe physical and mental suffering they have endured - not to mention the ongoing risks to children. From the beginning of the questioning, it was clear the experts saw addressing the widespread sexual violence by clergy falling squarely within the committee's scope and mission. Lombardi was right about one thing when, in an attempt to undermine the credibility of survivors and advocates raising these concerns, he suggested we had a "strong ideological character."

    The representatives of SNAP and CCR who were present when the Vatican faced questioning, and those who watched from afar around the world, do indeed have a strong ideological bent - that of being deeply and firmly committed to preventing the sexual torture of children and vulnerable adults by clergy and exposing and holding accountable those who have helped to perpetuate it. For a detailed analysis of the UN hearing, watch our report .

    Follow Pam Spees on Twitter at @PamSpees Follow The Center for Constitutional Rights on Twitter: www.twitter.com/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au3ZwOOwGvs

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.economist.com/news/international/21602248-bid-hold-catholic-leadership-responsible-paedophile-priests-looming-shadows

    The Catholic church and child abuse Looming shadows

    A bid to hold the Catholic leadership responsible for paedophile priests

    May 17th 2014 | VATICAN CITY | From the print edition

    POPES and their officials have long benefited from the Vatican’s unique dual status in international law.

    As the Vatican City State, it can shelter prelates wanted for questioning elsewhere and play host to offshore financial institutions such as the Vatican Bank. But when world leaders visit the pope in Rome it is to meet the absolute ruler of a global entity, the Holy See.

    As the Holy See, the Vatican engages in diplomacy, holds observer status at the UN and signs most treaties. The Holy See is sometimes called a sovereign entity without territory, although its sovereign, the pope, is also the ruler of the Vatican City State.

    It is a legal expression of the Catholic church’s leadership, yet American lawyers for the church have successfully argued that the Vatican is not responsible for Catholic clerics’ wrongdoing.

    On May 23rd the Vatican’s split personality will be put to a new test when a UN committee releases the findings of an inquiry into the Holy See’s compliance with the Convention against Torture, which it signed in 2002.

    Most of the questions put to the pope’s representative, Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, in the public hearings were about the sexual abuse of children and adolescents by Catholic clerics.

    If the committee decides it was torture, a wave of prosecutions of historic offences could follow: there is usually no time limit for bringing torture charges, as there generally is for sex crimes. And if it judges the Holy See accountable for priests’ and bishops’ misconduct, victims’ lawyers may challenge existing jurisprudence and demand compensation from Rome. The Vatican argues that the offences in question, though repugnant, should not be counted as torture.

    “Clerical sex abuse is an egregious betrayal of trust and a violation of the innocence of the victims. It causes untold suffering and scandal,” says Bishop Charles Scicluna, who until 2012 was the Vatican official chiefly responsible for prosecuting such cases.

    “But it does not fall under the definition of torture established in the convention. Neither does it fall under the article that deals with inhuman and degrading treatment. The reason is that [both articles] refer to acts committed by a public official.” But the Vatican’s interpretation exploits its own dual nature. It says its only public officials are those of the city state, such as its blue-uniformed gendarmes.

    At least one member of the committee disagrees. Felice Gaer, an American human-rights advocate, argues that the convention imposes a duty on the Vatican to prevent a breach by anyone under the “effective control of the officials of the Holy See”. Whatever the UN committee’s decision, victims say that the Vatican is still doing too little to protect children from paedophile clerics. Church officials maintain that sexual predators are just as common in other bodies that deal with children. But that is irrelevant, says David Clohessy of SNAP, which represents American victims of clerical abuse.

    “The issue is not how you keep the bad guys out, but what you do when the bad guys surface.” And here, he says, the Catholic church is deficient. Even if the Holy See is not accountable for the behaviour of Catholic clerics under the secular laws of the countries in which they minister, they are accountable to the Holy See under canon, or ecclesiastical, law. In 2001 Pope John Paul II ordered all credible allegations of abuse to be forwarded to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican department once known as the Holy Inquisition. Since 2004 it has defrocked 848 priests for raping and molesting children, and meted out lesser punishments to 2,572 others (usually because they were elderly and defrocking would have left them destitute).

    But the Vatican has not obliged bishops to report suspected abuse to the police because, say officials, in some places paedophile clerics could suffer barbaric punishment or execution. This argument hardly holds in, say, Italy—and yet in March the Italian bishops’ conference told its members they had no “juridical obligation” to tip off secular authorities. Cases are still coming to light of bishops who endangered children by failing to investigate allegations or by moving paedophile clerics to other dioceses, leaving them free to abuse again.

    Yet the Vatican has refrained from sanctioning them. “The safeguarding of minors in his diocesan community is a sacred duty of every bishop,” says Bishop Scicluna, and episcopal negligence is a crime under canon law. But in America, says Mr Clohessy, “not one bishop has lost a single day’s pay for having put kids in harm’s way.” That is where the continuing scandal becomes personal—and papal. Only the pope can handle penal cases against bishops under canonical law, so if the taboo against disciplining bishops is to be broken, only he can break it.

    But whether he intends to is hard to predict. Allegations of sex abuse against the Vatican’s former nuncio (ambassador) to the Dominican Republic, Archbishop Jozef Wesolowski, are being investigated there and in his native Poland. But in January a spokesman for prosecutors in Warsaw said the Vatican had told them that the archbishop had diplomatic immunity and was a citizen of the Vatican City State, which did not extradite its citizens.

    And in March Pope Francis implied in an interview that criticisms of the church’s handling of the scandal were unfair.

    But just a few weeks later he appointed Marie Collins, a campaigner who was assaulted by a priest as a child, to a commission he created to advise him on how to deal with sex-abuse cases. Francis’s papacy will be judged on how he treats this running sore.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.catholicleague.org/complaint-u-n-filed/

    COMPLAINT TO U.N. FILED May 15, 2014 by Bill Filed under Latest News Releases

    Bill Donohue is mailing a formal complaint today, with documentation, to the High Commissioner for Human Rights at the United Nations in Geneva regarding the conduct of Felice Gaer, Vice-Chairperson of the U.N. Committee Against Torture.

    Donohue charges her with violating specific strictures governing the impartiality of committee members. The basis of his complaint is Gaer’s recent exchange with officials from the Holy See, and her compromising relationship with an external activist organization, the Center for Reproductive Rights.

    To read Donohue’s complaint, click here.

    Copies are being sent to the heads of every U.S. diocese, select Vatican officials, and others.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/05/22/second-panel-criticzes-vatican-sex-abuse/YuX300eGKJYDNUPVdTXcmJ/story.html

    Second UN panel criticizes Vatican on sex abuse By John L. Allen Jr. | Globe Staff May 23, 2014

    The panel cited several specific cases, including Father Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul, a priest who returned to his native India after being charged with molesting a 14-year-old girl in Minnesota in 2004 and is currently being pursued by American prosecutors. ROME —

    For the second time, a United Nations panel has criticized the Vatican for its response to the child sexual abuse scandals in the Catholic Church, charging it with failing to mandate that abuse charges be reported to police, moving clergy to evade discipline, and failing to see that victims obtain adequate compensation.

    “Clergy . . . were transferred to other dioceses and institutions where they remained in contact with minors and others who are vulnerable,” the United Nations Committee against Torture charged in a new report, “and in some cases committed abuse in their subsequent placements.”

    The report follows a similar indictment from the Committee on the Rights of the Child that appeared in February, which asserted that the Vatican had fostered “impunity” for abusers. The document from the Committee against Torture was to be released in a press conference in Geneva Friday. The Boston Globe obtained an advance copy Thursday.

    Unlike the earlier UN assessment, the new report mixes criticism with praise for steps taken by the Catholic Church over the last decade to combat child abuse, including tougher legal sanctions for clergy and the creation of a new papal commission in December 2013 to press for reform. That commission includes Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley of Boston.

    The committee lauded an April 11 statement by Pope Francis on the subject of child abuse, in which he said, “We will not take one step backward with regards to how we will deal with this problem and the sanctions that must be imposed. On the contrary, we have to be even stronger.”

    The report follows a May 6 hearing in Geneva of the Committee against Torture in which Vatican officials disclosed for the first time that over the past decade, 848 clergy have been removed from the priesthood for acts of sexual abuse and 2,572 assigned lesser sanctions, most of the latter priests who were elderly or in ill health. At the same time, the committee suggested that pledges of zero tolerance by church officials aren’t always effectively translated into action.

    The panel cited several specific cases, including Father Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul, a priest who returned to his native India after being charged with molesting a 14-year-old girl in Minnesota in 2004 and is currently being pursued by American prosecutors, and Archbishop Josef Wesolowski of Poland, a former papal envoy in the Dominican Republic accused of sexual abuse both in that country and in Poland who has not been extradited from the Vatican to face charges.

    The Committee against Torture also cited the so-called Magdalene laundries in Ireland, institutions for indigent women during the 19th and 20th centuries in which abuse was allegedly widespread. The panel asked the Vatican to ensure that victims “receive fair, adequate and enforceable compensation and as full rehabilitation as possible, regardless of whether perpetrators of such acts have been brought to justice.”

    In its report, the panel said it was “concerned by reports’’ that Catholic officials “resist the principle of mandatory reporting’’ of abuse allegations.

    Among other specific recommendations, the panel suggested the Vatican ensure that abuse complaints are pursued by independent prosecutors so there’s “no hierarchical connection between the investigators and the alleged perpetrators,” and also insisted that officials who fail to respond appropriately to abuse complaints are subject to “meaningful sanctions.”

    That recommendation echoes the complaints of critics that while the church now imposes discipline on clergy who abuse, it does not have equally strong accountability for bishops and other officials who don’t take appropriate steps when abuse reports surface. The committee called for “an independent complaints mechanism’’ where victims or others can “confidentially report allegations of abuse.’’

    The UN panel also advised that a new commission established by the pope in 2013 to lead a process of reform should have “full power to investigate cases of alleged violations of the convention, [and to] ensure that the results of any of its investigations are made public and that they are promptly acted upon.” The committee asked that the Vatican respond to its concerns in a follow-up report by May 2015.

    Unlike the earlier report from the Committee on the Rights of the Child, the new report does not venture into matters of Catholic moral teaching on subjects such as abortion, homosexuality, or contraception. The Vatican ratified the Convention against Torture in 2002, and its appearance before the UN panel in May was part of a regularly scheduled series of hearings to monitor implementation in various nations.

    In comments to the Globe, the Vatican’s top envoy to the United Nations in Geneva said the report is different from the earlier document from the Committee on the Rights of the Child, calling the new document “more technical and professional.” “It takes into account the positive steps taken by [the Vatican] and the church in general,” said Archbishop Silvano Tomasi of Italy, expressing gratitude that it does not accuse the Vatican of having violated the UN’s 1984 convention against torture. Tomasi also expressed relief that the report does not imply the Catholic Church’s antiabortion stance amounts to a form of torture. At the same time, Tomasi disputed what he called two “incorrect assumptions” that he said are in the report.

    First, although the report never directly asserts that the child sexual abuse scandals in Catholicism constitute a form of torture under international law, Tomasi said such a conclusion could be inferred and claimed that it is not consistent with the text of the UN convention. Second, Tomasi said the report assumes that “all priests around the world are legally subject to the Vatican,” when in fact, he said, the Vatican is only directly responsible for personnel serving in the small territory of the Vatican City State.

    Critics, meanwhile, expressed little confidence in the Vatican’s response to the new UN report, saying it largely ignored the earlier series of recommendations from the Committee on the Rights of the Child. “It has now been 12 weeks since another United Nations panel released a lengthy report about the Church’s on-going clergy sexual violence and coverup crisis,” said a statement Thursday from the Survivors’ Network of those Abused by Priests, the largest victims’ advocacy group in the United States.

    “As best we can tell, every Catholic official is ignoring every one of those recommendations,” the group’s statement asserted. “That is shameful.” The Vatican on Friday released a formal statement in response to the UN report, largely expanding on the points Tomasi made in his Globe interview, and pledging to give “serious consideration” to the committee’s recommendations.

    John L. Allen Jr. is a Globe associate editor, covering global Catholicism. He may be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @JohnLAllenJr and on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/JohnLAllenJr.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/23/un-committee-against-torture-vatican-sex-abuse-scandal

    UN Committee Against Torture criticises Vatican handling of sex abuse

    Experts reject argument that Vatican only exercises control over city state and is not accountable for priests' actions worldwide

    Lizzy Davies in Rome theguardian.com, Friday 23 May 2014 10.43 EDT

    The Vatican has been criticised by the UN Committee Against Torture over its handling of the sex abuse scandal.

    Photograph: Sylvain Sonnet/Getty Images

    The United Nations Committee Against Torture (CAT) has criticised the Vatican's handling of the clerical sex abuse scandal, urging the Catholic church to do more to punish perpetrators, help victims and place "meaningful sanctions" on clerics who fail to deal properly with credible allegations.

    In observations published on Friday following a two-day hearing this month, the panel's 10 experts rejected the Holy See's argument that it only exercises control over the tiny Vatican City State and cannot be held accountable for the actions of Catholic priests and bishops throughout the world.

    They called on the Holy See to "take effective measures" to monitor individuals under its "effective control" and to "stop and sanction" conduct that would constitute "credible allegations of violations of the [UN] Convention [against Torture]".

    Before the report had even been released, the Vatican issued a statement declaring that it had not been found to be "in violation" of the convention.

    But advocates of abuse victims rejected this outright, labelling the report "a historic document" that they said recognised clerical sexual abuse as a form of torture and other cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment or punishment.

    "They're clearly wrong," said Pam Spees of the US-based Center for Constitutional Rights, regarding the Vatican's assertion. "This is an important recognition of the gravity of these offences that have been minimised by the church, places responsibility where it belongs – with the hierarchy in the church, not the victims – and could help open new avenues for redress."

    Felice D Gaer, the CAT's American vice-chair, told the Guardian: "Legal scholars will tell you that when we write about a concern and make a recommendation we are identifying something that is not in conformity with the requirements of the convention. We don't use the word 'violation'; others do. But it's quite clear it's not in conformity with the requirements of the convention." The report was the first issued by the CAT into the Holy See, and comes after another UN panel – the Committee on the Rights of the Child – issued a scathing rebuke to the Vatican in February, calling it out not only on its handling of child sex abuse cases but also on its stances on abortion and homosexuality.

    Those findings prompted an angry response from the Vatican, which accused the panel of ideologically motivated interference in church teachings. The CAT report, while critical of the church's sex abuse record, praises it for the steps taken, and, crucially, leaves out any mention of reproductive rights, which some campaigners had urged the panel to consider. John L Allen, long-term Vatican observer and correspondent for the Boston Globe, said the difference between the two reports indicated the CAT had not wanted its criticisms to be vulnerable to similar attacks.

    "It's pretty clear that, the last time around, the Vatican and its allies used the fact that there was a lot of language in that report that wasn't about sex abuse – it was about abortion, homosexuality and so on, culture wars – to suggest that it was ideologically driven. They also complained that it had not acknowledged any positive steps the church had taken," he said. "They styled the whole thing as a sort of political exercise – you know, axe-grinding and so on.

    It would seem clear to me that the Committee Against Torture did not want its findings to be dismissed in the same way." In its report, the CAT panel noted progress made by the church on the clerical sex abuse scandal, for example welcoming Pope Francis's establishment of a commission for the protection of minors, and his statement in April that the church needed to be "even stronger" in its tackling of the problem.

    The UN experts also welcomed the Vatican's publication for the first time this month of comprehensive statistics on how many Catholic priests had been disciplined following abuse allegations. But they added that the Holy See had not provided data regarding how many abuse allegations had been reported to the civil law enforcement authorities in the relevant countries. The CAT said it was "concerned" by reports that some church officials "resist the principle of mandatory reporting of [abuse] allegations to civil authorities", urging the church to prevent "credibly accused" abusers being simply transferred to other parishes and dioceses "for the purposes of avoiding proper investigation and punishment of their crimes."

    Any church official who failed to handle credible allegations "with due diligence" should be punished, it added.

    Citing the case of Polish archbishop Josef Wesolowski, a former papal envoy to the Dominican Republic accused of sex abuse, it said the Holy See should "if warranted … ensure such persons are criminally prosecuted or extradited for prosecution by the civil authorities" of the relevant country. It also said it was "deeply concerned" by reports of victims being unable to obtain adequate redress or compensation for their suffering and asked the Vatican to set up an independent complaints mechanism.

    In its statement, the Vatican said: "The Holy See condemns sex abuse as a serious crime and a grave violation of human dignity." It noted the criticisms within the report and said it would "give serious consideration" to its recommendations.

  • Sol Reform
    Sol Reform

    CCR and SNAP respond to UN CAT report

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okE21mDm_wo

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit