In reading Terrys latest post, if made me think of something that exists and many of us have experienced but I have not really put into a logical thoughts process before. In Terrys 4 facts everyone should know about JW's, the second one referrs to the Walsh trial where unity is said to be more important than truth, in no uncertain terms.
This made me think about how one would bring up this fact. My mind wandered to the beginning of my fade, when inevitably, many of us open up our mouths and say too much. Depending on our button we say things like...
- The society had a wink wink relationship with the UN that was exposed secularly.
- Did you know at the walsh trial the president of the WTBTS said....
- ____people could have died from refusing blood over the decades, and this 1994 watchtower martyrs children.
- Did you know organs used to be forbidden?
- Did you know statements regarding the end have been made almost 7 times over the years?
- Did you know the generation teaching has changed a total of 11 times?
......and many many more.
Because to those without open minds these things seem so far fetched, they seem to immediately wonder HOW do you know these things. In fact, I have very point blankly been asked by someone I shared the letter from Rutherford to the third Reich with......where did you get this?
In other words, very point blank, the source of the information is more important than the information itself. In speaking with someone about the Walsh trial, I invited them to research wether it was accurate on their own. Later, they came back to me and said "all I found was apostate information, I assume that is where you got it!". At that point, the very mention of the item, has already identified you as "associating" with apostates, which then by default makes whatever information shared invalid.
Anyone else notice this? Is there a work around?