Maybe some one can post the story, Daily news here
in Calif.
Nanny who refuse to leave, unbelievable story..
by jam 8 Replies latest social current
-
-
jam
The poor couple install a lock on the refrigerator, and she (Nanny)
told the couple they must leave their home between certain hours
of the day.
-
LoisLane looking for Superman
This woman they found on Craig's list is a 100% nutter. I am stunned that the police say it is a civil case and they can't get involved. The homeowner's have 3 small children. This older woman is a threat to the whole family. The report states she has sued 37 other people, even family members.
The woman took the job under false pretenses. She isn't doing the job she agreed to do in order to get free room and board.
The article states the homeowner's will be prosecuted if they put the woman's suitcase outside.
This is too crazy to even think about.
LL
-
AnneB
There has to be more to the story. Didn't they do a background check before hiring?
-
jam
I don't understand, people get their walking papers everyday
from their job, there's the door, see you. Why is this so
different??? I would make it so uncomfortable for her that
she would be running out of my house. I would call my
friend "Weird Willie" and let him hang out in her room.
-
jam
Yes they did background check, they said..But Craig list, to
invite someone in your home to take care of your kids is
crazy..
-
jam
This is the kicker, she has threaten to bring a lawsuit if
they try to evict her. She is on the "vexatious litigant list"
for abusing the legal system...Lois Lane mention "37 lawsuits "
to her credit...
-
jgnat
Aaah, I worked in the Justice file room and I read our most famous vexatios litigant file. It is like an addiction. If I were them I would get free student legal advice and try and do as much for free as possible. Because she will never stop as long as she keeps being fed. Vexatious Litigation is a criminal offence and the couple can hand over all their evidence to the Prosecutor.
-
AnneB
There's always more to the story; sometimes you have to wait a while, but it eventually surfaces:
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2014/06/27/knx-couple-legally-should-have-paid-the-wont-go-nanny/
UPLAND (CBSLA.com) — The “Won’t Go Nanny” is apparently not going anywhere anytime soon.
Marcel and Ralph Bracamonte, the Upland couple who hired 64-year-old Diane Stretton from a Craigslist ad in March, have started legal proceedings to evict her from their house after she refused to leave their home — even after they fired her.
KNX 1070 Investigative Reporter Charles Feldman spoke to Marcel Bracamonte on Friday by phone and told her, according to the California Labor Commission, the nanny should have been paid.
Bracamonte told KCAL9′s Amy Johnson that she and the nanny agreed to a live-in relationship that would have Stretton do housekeeping chores as well as helping to care for the couple’s three children for free room and board. Bracamonte concurred with Feldman that that was the couple’s arrangement with Stretton.
But Feldman says, according to California law, nannies are considered employees
and they need to be financially compensated for their work. In other words, just free room and board violates state labor laws.When Feldman tried to discuss the matter with Marcel Bracamonte, her carefully crafted image, he reported, “turned notably sour.”
“You know what, if you’re going to try to turn this around on me,” she said, “I don’t want to do this interview.”
Feldman said, “I’m not trying to turn it around …”
Bracamonte cut him off and said, “You’re trying to turn it around on me.”
He said, “No, no. I’m …”
Bracamonte said, “Charles, I don’t want to do this interview if you’re not going to try to turn this around on me and make me the bad person.”
Feldman replied, “I’m not making anybody the bad person. I talked to the labor department and …”
Marcel then said, “And I don’t care. And I don’t want that on the air. I don’t want that on the air.”
Feldman continues, “I was just asking what your understanding was with her about the conditions of employment.”
“The conditions of employment,” Bracamonte said, “was she got, in exchange for room and board, for helping me with the kids.”
“Right,” Feldman counters, “but did you ever check to see if, check with anybody, to see if, you were able to do that arrangement with her … to do work just in exchange for room and board?”
At this point, Bracamonte has had enough.
“You know what, you’re not, you’re not a nice person,” she says. “And I don’t want to talk to you, Charles.”
And then she apparently hung up.
Feldman reported that Bracamonte never returned to the call and hung up on him when he reached out to her afterward.
Awaiting the next installment.
