good books on critical thinking

by tepidpoultry 7 Replies latest jw friends

  • tepidpoultry
    tepidpoultry

    Hi, wanting to improve my thinking. Thanks, Tepid.

  • Magnum
    Magnum

    I have all the books shown below (none of which I've read completely) (most obtained at library sales, etc.). See especially the ones highlighted in yellow. The Chaffee book seems to be your best bet - it's been through at least seven editions. You can probably get cheap used copies through Amazon.

    Logic Made Easy. Bennett

    Beginning Logic. Lemmon

    Deductive Forms: An Elementary Logic. Neidorf

    Introduction to Logic (12e). Copi/Cohen

    A Concise Introduction to Logic (6e). Hurley

    Introduction to Logic. Suppes

    The Way of Words: an Informal Logic. Munson

    Language, Truth, and Logic. Ayer

    Practical Logic. Beardsley

    Symbolic Logic & The Game of Logic (two books bound as one). Carroll

    Arguments: Deductive Logic Exercises. Pospesel

    Fundamentals of Symbolic Logic (revised ed). Ambrose/Lazerowitz

    The Art of Reasoning (3e). Kelley

    Argumentation and the Decision Making Process. Rieke/Sillars

    Elements of Argument: A Text and Reader (4e). Rottenberg

    Advocacy and Opposition: An Introduction to Argumentation (3e). Rybacki/Rybacki

    Writing Arguments A Rhetoric with Readings (6e). Ramage/Bean/Johnson

    Perspectives on Argument (4e). Wood

    How to Argue and Win Every Time. Spence

    Persuasion and Social Influence. Trenholm

    Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining (2e). Gass/Seiter

    Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility (9e). Larson

    Coercion: Why We Listen to What “They” Say (uncorrected proof for limited distribution). Rushkoff

    Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (revised ed). Cialdini

    Thinking Critically (7e). Chaffee

    Creative and Critical Thinking. Moore

    Critical Thinking (3e). Moore/Parker

    Practical Thinking. de Bono

    de Bono’s Thinking Course. de Bono

    Think Clearly: A Guide to Personal Effectiveness. Moxley/Fife

    Success with the Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense. Elgin

    Labyrinths of Reason. Poundstone

    Strategic Debate. Wood

    Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases (2e). Lewicki/Litterer/Saunders/Minton

  • Mum
    Mum

    Chaffee also wrote a book called The Thinker's Way. It has step by step strategies for thinking through situations and figuring out what to do. I recommend it. I also recommend any of Wayne Dyer's books, particularly his first one, entitled Your Erroneous Zones. It's not specifically about critical thinking, but about setting yourself free and not being manipulated.

    Happy reading!

  • LV101
    LV101

    Mum - Appreciate your info about Dyer's "Your Erroneous Zones." I remember that best seller and must have bought more than once always loaning out never reading myself - not smart! It's probably pricey now. Might have to check out on Amazon. I'm laughing because my girlfriend(s) and I use to call it "Erogenous Zones."

  • villagegirl
    villagegirl

    Please add to your list:

    The Tyranny of Words, by Stuart Chase

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    Tepid,

    I developed critical appraisal skills as I was required to appraise scientific literature, that was a ramp to my critical thinking. If you google 'develop critical appraisal' it will provide many resources on how to do this.

    I think you have asked a great question, but a hard one to answer. It may be that there is a gap in the market exactly for this. In an information age that arrived acutely, many of us were not are skilled to sift through the information and be usefully skeptical.

    For me it is about evidence. The better the evidence the more reliable the idea is PROBABLY. The less evidence the less time or interest it has from me. Some people confuse skeptisism and critical thinking with being close minded, it is quite the opposite. Sure question EVERYTHING, but promoting mysticisim because it is close minded to reject the supernatural is not focusing on......evidence.

    I wish I could give you a better answer, if I think of one I will come back to you. I must add that watching hundreds of intellectual debates will help you see how others are figuring out their way through life, it isn't the data in these debates that I found useful but approaches to the data, the thought process.

    Before long you see where honesty and truth (very scientific) becomes hope and comfort (believers) as people sit on a spectrum of reliance on evidence.

    The it is about deciding where you sit on the spectrum.

    It is an exciting, protective and interesting journey , if not tiring, to figure everything out for yourself, enjoy it x

  • John_Mann
    John_Mann

    Critical thinking is a very simple process (and you will never find a step-by-step manual. Even though some books claim that like the bible and every WT literature), basically:

    - Scientific method.

    - Logic (in a nutshell: two true statements can't contradict one each other).

    - Occam's razor.

    - Fallacy detection (see some list of fallacies).

    - Reality check.

    If your worldview needs some flaw in evidence, internal logic, simple explanation and fallacies, you can be sure (99.9999%) you are being fooled.

    And when this happen sooner or later your worldview will be crushed by the supreme judge of all worldviews: the reality.

    Reality destroy every flawed worldview, like "1914 generation that will not pass away" and "communication with dead people", for instance.

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    A good book that I read prior to reading more "technical" works as mentioned above, was "Believing Bullshit" by Stephen Law, available on Amazon .

    It really helps to see how we all did as the book's Title suggests, and why we did so.

    More importantly, the book will ensure we never fall in to similar traps again.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit