I'm skeptical of the veracity of their claims, but assuming it's true-
Part of me is with you that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and I would like the WTS to reform. However, the only reform I'm interested in is the end to shunning and a stop to the policies and propaganda aimed at demonizing those who do not wish to be associated with the JW "religion." As an atheist that's stuck in for my wife, that's the only reform that helps me, aside from perhaps reform on the blood doctrine that could potentially kill my wife should some rare circumstance arise.
The other part of me feels like reform of the WTS is the worst thing that can happen for me. If the organization becomes more reasonable and places itself on a firmer doctrinal position, it becomes more difficult to point out the flaws and errors and corruption to my wife. So, in some ways, the worse the org gets the better my chances of making a clean break from it are.
If it is true that there is disention among the ranks - it spells change for the WTS and the GB will have to tread carefully to maintain control. If the GB is seen as capitulating to the dissenters "below" them, it will plant seeds of doubt (Fred Franz's infamous tail wagging the dog talk comes to mind) in many adherants and could potentially lead to a schism. A split in the organization would likely lead to oppurtunites to make an easy exit, even if one doesn't want to be a part in either of the two peices of the split. Just like when you break a peice of bread, there's lots of small individual crumbs that escape from the two halves. If such a schism occurrs, and I'm still stuck in at the time, I hope my family will be among the crumbs.