I'm getting a kick on the WOL board, there is a post there that's too funny.
Apparently one of the witnesses went on a return visit with an elder and the guy they came to visit was "un-witnessable." How? well, apparently he had the same beliefs as they did, so how do you witness to someone who agrees with you?
So the frame of thought from the replies is pretty much, If he has some truths, he must be an apostate, or perhaps he studied one of our publication. Apparently because this fellows only disgreement was the fact that Jehovah has a visible organization, so they left him for dead as bird food at armageddon.
Geez, since when did the Society have exclusive rights to the truth? Because someone or group have similar beliefs they MUST be apostate, ludicrous! They fail to remember that C.T. Russell borrowed much of his theology from the Adventist, even in a past issue of the Watchtower they admited that George Storrs and Henry Grew had similar thoughts, of course nothing was mention of Storss being Russell's mentor.
It just never ceases to amaze me how the Witnesses think!
Here's the link: http://www.witnessesonline.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000142.html
_______________
Never take a laxative and a sleeping pill on the same night.