“As for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively die.” (Genesis 2:17)
JWs interpret this tree as the symbol “knowledge of good and bad,” right of God to set standards for us; hence eating of it means snatching God’s right to rule over us—thus self-rule means ruination and death, and conversely God’s rule means blessings and eternal life.
This interpretation has some intrinsic problems!
1) If the tree is named “knowledge of good and bad,” then it would mean man can ‘know what is good and bad ONLY AFTER eating of that tree’! But that was not happened—Adam and Eve simply thought that it would be GOOD for them if they ate of that tree EVEN BEFORE eating of that tree! Hence a tree could not have been named that way! Truth is that there was no such a tree with such a name as ‘EVERY fruit-bearing tree is already given for man’s sustenance.’ (Genesis 1:29)
2) Everything about fruit-bearing trees is good—they subsist on mud and dirty water and give back nutritious fruit (and sweet/pure juice or water in the case of some trees); hence are actually symbol of pure goodness [goodness for the sake of goodness as they produce fruit not for them to eat but for others to eat and enjoy], hence can never be a symbol of bad also! (James 3:11, 12) Such goodness is the core attribute of God Himself. (Mathew 5;44-48; Mark 10:18)
If so, what is the true interpretation of this tree? There is no interpretation needed as this tree also has its origin in “the false stylus of the secretaries” who have “worked in sheer falsehood.” (Jeremiah 8:8)