At one point, didn't the Society teach that Adam and Eve either would not be resurrected or, if so, they would not attain the Kingdom of Heaven? I remember that a number of years ago, a JW told me that John the Baptist also would not obtain Eternal Life in the Kingdom of Heaven. Their evidence was Matthew 11:11, where Jesus says, "Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he."
The reasoning is that there are two classes of resurrection. One is the immortal, earthly type and the heavenly class. So what Jesus was saying was that John, though great, was not as great as the least of the heavenly class. The traditional Christian view, however, is:
By "the least" we prefer, then, with Chrysostom and other ancient Fathers, to understand Jesus himself. The literal meaning of the Greek μικρότερος is "the lesser," not "least" (in the Revised Version, in the text we find "he that is but little," but in the margin "lesser"). By "lesser" or "little" Chrysostom supposes that the Saviour refers to himself as less than John in age and according to the opinions of many. "Thus, then, among the sons of men no prophet greater than John the Baptist has arisen; yet there is one among you lesser in age and perhaps in public estimation, - in the kingdom of God, though, greater than he." Wordsworth strengthens the above interpretation by his comment on the words, "among those that are born of women." "No one among those born of human parents had appeared greater than this John the Baptist; but do not suppose that he is greater than I. I am not γεννητὸς γυναικῶν , but Θεοῦ , and though after him in the gospel because he is my precursor, yet I am greater than he." This great expositor, while on the whole preferring the usual interpretation, yet considers that the explanation which refers "he that is least" to Christ, is not lightly to be set aside. If this interpretation be adopted, the usual punctuation of the passage must be slightly altered thus: "He that is lesser, in the kingdom of God is greater than he."
Another view, closely related, is that because Jesus took upon himself the sins of all mankind, then he has the least claim on the Kingdom of God. Either way, Jesus was referring to himself. He was the least in the Kingdom of Heaven, because Christ, being the greatest, is the servant of all, paying for our sins and removing our pains and scars.
Yet the WTBTS has chosen its own unique way of interpreting scripture. Do they still hold to their views about Adam/Eve and John? And do the emblem takers really think they're better?