Another sad case.
Two sisters molested (no intercourse).
WTS gets warrants quashed.
130 years of protecting molesters
by berrygerry 7 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
-
-
blondie
Yet the WTS would disfellowship 2 adults where there was sexual behavior without intercourse.
-
konceptual99
Thw WTS can disfellowship two people where there has been no sexual activity proven c.f. two people being in the same house overnight.
-
Jeannette
They're twisted.
-
blondie
Thanks konceptual...totally right.
-
sparky1
konceptual99....if two men or two women that are unrelated stay in the same house overnight nothing is ever said or implied. Unless of course they 'may be known in the community to have homosexual leanings'. Watchtower morals and medical practices are confusing, corrupt, criminal and crazymaking!
-
berrygerry
This case is probably on here somewhere - it seems like a bottomless pit.
Best quote - from the molesting father:
"Mr. G.P. privately apologized to the plaintiff for his conduct, while at the same time telling her that she had, after all, "enjoyed it too"."
Barbara and Penton were prepared to testify, but not allowed (Kudos, Barbara).
Worst quote - from the judge:
I accept the evidence of John Didur that it is not now the policy of the Jehovah's Witness to require a victim of abuse to proceed through the steps envisioned in verses 15-18 of Matthew 18, nor was that the policy in 1989. He explained that Matthew 18 applies to private disputes between people, such as disputes over financial matters, and cannot be applied to a serious sin against God's laws, such as child abuse. I understand why the defence witnesses are genuinely puzzled as to how this could have come up in this situation. However, I am confident that Matthew 18 was mentioned specifically to the plaintiff and that she was told it applied. Further, I am confident that it was after receiving this advice that she spoke to the M.s.
-
cultBgone
Jehovah's Witnesses
Proudly Protecting Perverts
Since 1879