You are probably wondering if I've lost my mind with a question like this~!
There is a method to my madness, however.
________________________
Here is where this query originated; follow closely and comment. . .
_____________________
FAITH is clearly connected to HOPE. But, there is a distinction with a difference.
How so?
FAITH is a single-minded certainty without proof which does not entertain the possibility of failure.
HOPE is an optimism carried along by positive thinking--but--with the awareness things may not work out ideally.
A harsher, more pragmatic way of saying it:
FAITH borders on obsessive delusion while HOPE is more clear-headed because it does not INSIST on excluding disproof.
________________________
If you can accept my definitions and the distinctions cited, please consider the topic question in that narrow context.
__________________________
1. If Jesus KNEW, from the experience of having been in heaven, His death would lead to resurrection and installment as King--
FAITH would not have been a component of his motives, personality, and actions.
On the other hand,
2. If Jesus only gradually came to a kind of interior mental awareness (epiphany) of His identity and decided to act on it fully
(suicidal as it was) then He would be a person of FAITH.
____________________________
WHICH one is it?
"My God, my god; why have you forsaken me," sounds very much like loss of faith under duress.
The prayer in Gethsemane, "Let this cup pass from my lips. . .,"sounds like faith under duress.
______________________
WHY DO I ASK THIS QUESTION?
This uncertainty, doubt, momentary wavering must have confused early Christians who thought of Jesus as demi-god, or God himself.
There were many, many opinions. There were many writings. There was considerable ongoaing debate and discussion.
I believe this mixture of viewpoints seeped into the New Testament.
This would explain why BOTH Trinitarian and non-Trinitarian texts are present.
This would explain why three hundred years passed and during the Nicene Council the bishops were STILL arguing.
Even after a Trinity was agreed upon, there were temporary reversals; first Arius, then Athanasius prevailing and finding favor.
______________________
Rather than discuss THE TRINITY--please . . .
Answer the topic question in this rather narrow way.