About those who "love to speculate"

by MacHislopp 5 Replies latest jw friends

  • MacHislopp
    MacHislopp

    Hello,

    how about this one to refresh the memory?

    *** w52 2/1 80-1 Jehovah's Theocratic Organization Today ***

    THE FOLLY OF SPECULATING

    13 There are some who seem to dote on speculations. They love to be the talking center of little groups, voicing their theories on how or when this or that is going to happen. They may not be deliberately rebellious about what the slave provides, but if they can offer only what the slave has already supplied they do not stand out.

    How can they shine personally if they merely reflect what all others of Jehovah’s witnesses are reflecting? So they seek for something more sensational, for some “new light” to dazzle unwary listeners. As they feed the open-mouthed listeners their line of new theories, the listeners by their rapt attention feed the ego of the speculators. When someone else begins to do the talking and occupies the spotlight, the speculator loses interest in the conversing group and drifts on.

    These speculating ones may acknowledge that some of their past theories were wrong, but they do not show they have learned the lesson from these mistakes by refraining from bringing forth new theories. Their longing to be viewed as an independent and deep thinker is stronger than their desire to be theocratic.

    And the rest is in § 14:

    *** w52 2/1 81 Jehovah's Theocratic Organization Today ***

    14 Some of the speculating ones are more rebellious than others, disagreeing dogmatically with the discreet slave’s provisions, exalting themselves above the Lord’s established channel.

    They argue that the theocratic organization has not always been right, and that they once had ideas the organization rejected but now teaches, and thus imply that their present theories will likewise be accepted in time.

    They never mention the numerous speculations they have advanced in the past that were never adopted. That would spoil their campaign to get their present ideas gobbled up.

    What their conceit blinds them to is that the visible theocratic

    organization has never claimed infallibility, that it knows the

    message will be continually purified by the elimination of erroneous

    ideas, that it expects new truths to become manifest as more

    prophecies are fulfilled, that gradually the light will shine more

    and more until the perfect day, and that the clarifications will come

    through the discreet slave and not self-exalting speculators. (Prov. 4:18; Isa. 6:5-7; Mal. 3:1-3)

    It is a continuous process, for the slave is “to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time”. (Luke 12:42, NW)

    Doubtless some do have ideas that are not published until later; to do so earlier may have been premature, may not have been “at the proper time”. Wait upon the Lord."

    J.C. MacHislopp

  • somebody
    somebody

    Machislopp,

    I love all your posts. They are are very enlightening and thought provoking. If you really want to do a search about "those who love to speculate" and those "voicing their theories on how or when this or that is going to happen.", then do a search on your cd using the search word "1975". You'll be amazed.

    Thank you for all your posts. I read all of them.

    peace,
    somebody

  • eyes_opened
    eyes_opened

    Geeeeeeez, I don't think they could get any more hypocritical if they tried! Talk about say one thing and do another! Thanks for another great example Mac. Keep em coming!

    Eyes

  • MacHislopp
    MacHislopp

    Hello Eyes_opened and Somebody,

    Thanks for your appreciation!

    *Eyes_opened: you hit the right spot...HYPOCRISY,

    and when is closely followed by her

    "sister " THE LIE,...well you can

    understand the dammage they can cause.

    Jehovah, Jesus Christ, you and me and

    thousands of others HATE this, and we

    would like to do something to OPENLY

    EXPOSE such things, not matter where

    they are from.

    *SOMEBODY: I'm pleased that you do like what I post.

    In the past I used to do long researches

    with the old methods: Index at the end of

    publications, reading pages and pages of

    printed volumes and make photocopies

    and writing " personal notes".

    Now with the CD (latest version) which I

    have in several languages (...to spot the

    differences) it much, easier.

    Concerning you suggestion about "1975" , I

    have already "100' of quotes about that

    subject and also about "1914 /generation",

    plus many other subjects. It is from these

    "...files " that take subject for my posts.

    To end on a more personal note, I have to add

    that your post do appear to me " as if spoken

    with a very gentle and soft tone of voice ".

    I do believe that our speech, our writing

    also gives clues about our personality.

    Peace to you too,

    J.C.MacHislopp

  • philo
    philo

    Ditto to all the remarks so far. But do you have to have an open line between each good one?

    philo (sincerely)

  • zev
    zev

    I was thinking....
    If it is so easy to do searchs on their cd and come up with all this "stuff", then why continue to produce it? Especially when "they" know that there are people like us who will pick it apart. It baffles me.

    mac, try not hitting the return key as you type, could be that when your getting to the end of a line you hit the return key and it adds an extra space. Just a suggestion.

    __

    zev

    Sitting on the Wrong Side of the Fence Class

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit