Hello aChristian,
I've read a couple of your posts - and found them centered. Nice to meet you.
I've been reading about the controversy surrounding the Dead Sea Scrolls. To my knowledge, all were from the same time period, give or take some decades. But only a few where chosen to substantiate the Bible - thus the use in quoting. The ones which didn't support the Biblical Canon as chosen by the early church fathers (predominately Catholics) - were considered of much less value - thus never quoted in support.
So, as long as the scrolls supported the Bible, it's correct to use them. If they support another thought - dismiss them. The apocryphal writings are viewed much the same way, imo.
As to the Holy Spirit of God, or a part of God, chosing the Biblical Canon which was chosen by Catholics (or forefathers of Roman Catholic Church) - there is no proof of that. That is the same argument used when the WTBTS says it has God's spirit. How do we know? Because we say so.
But it is curious that all christian churches accept these ancient Catholics theologians and their choice of books. But concepts agreed at during other famous meetings (Nicene Creed), are dismissed by the WTBTS. The WTBTS in particular picks apart the Catholic Church - but accepts completely their choice of doctrinal support - the Bible.
I've enjoyed reading about the Dead Sea Scrolls from various authorities - something that was seriously "frowned upon" as an active jw. It's nice to the freedom to read and investigate what I want to now.
Btw, I am an inactive, but in good standing jw. May I ask if you are a member of an organized Christian denomination? Have you ever been a Jehovah's Witness?
waiting