Why do you think the Organization, the Governing Body in particular, are so reluctant to deal with the issue of Pedophilia head on? After all, they'll disfellowship elders without a moments hesitation for adultery, fornication, smoking, doing drugs, gambling, homosexuality, even murder........what makes the issue of dealing with elders who are guilty of one of the worst crimes of all, raping young children, so foreign to them?
My own opinion is that the Organization is just starting to learn how to live in the 20th Century.......forget the 21st Century; they won't be there for another 80 years. In the early 1900's and right up until probably the late 1970s or early 80s, no one wanted to deal with this issue, period. My grandfather told me (shortly before he died), that when he was growing up in the early 1920s, his step-father tried to have sex with him.....he was 10 years old at the time. He fought back and ran to tell his mother what had happened. The result? She beat him for "telling such lies". She had apparently been a "good mother" up until this moment and he said he never forgot the look on her face when he told her what her "new husband" had tried to do........these people were not Witnesses, but there was that "we don't talk about that here" mentality that I think pervaded society in general. Best to just ignore it and if anyone brings it out in the open, just beat that person, even if they're the victim. After all, we wouldn't want to spoil our "image" as a happy, loving family now would we?