UK Government Inquiry into WT Affairs, Info Req

by invisible 3 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  invisible

  OK, Was it last night or this morning(?), someone mentioned something about the possibility of bringing about a UK Government Inquiry examining the WT Corporation/s. Also mentioned was the fact that a few MP's are interested in WT affairs.

  If you need someone to spearhead this through the right channels, only too happy to oblige. What information / contacts can we share between us to further this aim?

  Another subject, media. What tools can we utilise to positive strategic advantage in stating our collective case against malpractices within the WT and getting the media on our side? Any ideas?

  Also I could well have available through the place that I work at, full access to film making equipment, including digital cameras and editing suite. If you are UK based, have an interest in getting the WT to transform some policies or just getting our message out there more professionally, feel welcome to give me a shout, will see what I can do. (Anyone fancy a trip to WT London HQ?)

  'Celtic' Mark - Cornwall UK
• 

  Francois

  I'm not familiar with your laws. On what basis could the House probe JW activities? There is a good point in this. In the states, the First Amendment protects these swine. If I understand correctly, there is no such protection for them to hide their racket behind.

  It makes no sense, when you think about it, to attempt direct confrontation of the WT in the states. However, a couple of considerations. First, Sun Tzu said to know your enemy better than yourself. Well, as former witnesses, we know them as we know ourselves. We understand their jargon. We know their game.

  Sun Tzu also recommended approaching a superior force indirectly. It would not be wise to further clarify that remark, other than to say that the WT achilles heel might just be through a branch office.

  Additionally, it is a crime in the United States to bribe an offical of a foreign government, as was described in C of C relative to Mexico. Unfortunately, the statue might have run on that. However, since attacking the head of the snake isn't convenient, perhaps we should dig under the snake and attack its soft European underbelly.

  All my disgust, all my revulsion, all my hatred for their heartlessness was galvanized by one unremarkable thing I saw that detestable needle-nosed bastard Jacarz do on the Panorama program. He put his hand over the lens of the camera that was filming him, just like you've seen each and every other low-life sub-human scum from Pol Pot to Manuel Noreiga do. That was my moment of crystalline clarity.

  I don't want them to reform. I want them to cease to exist. And I'll do whatever I can to help them along to that goal.

  Right now, I'd like to know the answer to the original question. Upon what basis can Parliment launch an investigation of a foreign corporation - even if it is masquerading as a religion?

  francois
• 

  dmouse

  This thread may help to clarify:

  http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=32396&site=3
• 

  invisible

  Francoise

  This is the very reason why we need to start sharing our knowledge bases more. I'm not about to set up a confrontational discussion here or doubt another persons unique abilities by one having a sense of hope through all this, to actually partake in DOING something about it. How do you suppose the Panorama programme was researched and made?

  As for US Law, no comment, I'm sticking to matters pertaining for present to this country only, no offense.

  As for UK Parliament, maybe quite a lot. It depends on a few factors.

  Take care

  'Celtic' Mark - Cornwall