Need an answer to this question ?

by compton 4 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • compton
    compton

    The Bible that I use says in the footnotes at the bottom of the page that Jerusalem did
    not fall when they carried off king Jeohakim,but later in 587b.c. But again when the command
    comes to restore the Temple, in the foot note it says 538 b.c. This does not agree with
    Jermiahs' prophecy when he said the release from captivity would be seventy years. Please
    explain as I read these dates come from Babylonion records.

  • joenobody
    joenobody

    Which Bible is that?

  • compton
    compton

    Its the " New Living Bible". I know many people don't aprove of this translation because its paraphrased, but its easy to read. I will check other translations on this subject. But recently

    I was playing with dates and I came up with this amazing fact, 587 subtracted from Daniels

    prophecy 2,520-587=1933 the very year "the beginning of sorrows began for the Jews" math 24

  • compton
    compton

    Well I found the answer at Carl Olaf Jonnson's site. Aparently the watchtower had the same problem

    and changed the dates to fit the 70 yrs prophecy. Aparently 587 b.c. is correct but it is the other

    end of the sevrnty years that needed to be set straight. If you are interested go to his site! I

    was too impatient, remember Jesus's words "Knock and it will be opened to you"

  • Bleep
    Bleep

    Most modern translations are good to use.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit