'Battered Beyond Repair' by Bill O' Reilly@foxnews

by sf 4 Replies latest jw friends

  • sf
    sf

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,59103,00.html

    Tuesday, July 30, 2002
    By Bill O'Reilly

    To watch "The Memo" click here.

    Two of the world's most influential religions are battered, perhaps, beyond repair. The pope refused to meet with some of the victims of priest abuse while in Toronto. His handlers said he didn't have time.

    But this trip had been planned for months, and everybody in Rome knows that the scandal is the worst thing that has happened to the church ever in North America. So why wouldn't John Paul take 30 minutes to counsel some Catholics who had been hurt? Do you think Jesus would have rejected that request?

    The incident points out the continuing trouble the Catholic Church is having in dealing with the reality of the priest scandal. Clear-thinking people know that most priests are good people and that the church does an enormous amount of charitable work.

    But by failing to deal effectively with the child molestation by priests, the church has lost its moral authority.

    Likewise, the Islamic religion has been severely damaged by the ongoing terrorism being done in its name. Millions of Americans remain appalled that no meaningful demonstrations have been held around the world by Muslims condemning terrorism.

    We constantly hear the drumbeat of excuses justifying homicidal behavior by Islamic extremists. The silence by the Islamic leadership in the face of civilian murder is simply horrifying, and the excuse that a few imams have spoken out is bogus. Until the world sees huge demonstrations condemning the Usama bin Ladens of the world, Islam has lost credibility in the West.

    The question is, can these religions recover in our lifetimes? We'll put that question to a couple of experts later on in the broadcast. But Talking Points says no, the damage is immense. Only a new reformer pope could restore the moral authority of Catholicism, and it would take him years. And only a genuine miracle could do the same for Islam in the West.

    This, of course, is terrible news for the world, which needs moral guidance and strong religious establishments in order to spread peace and harmony. The absence of strong spiritual voices will be devastating to a world already steeped in hatred and greed.

    Think about it. The bad guys have hijacked Islam, and the perverts and their enablers have crippled Catholicism.

    That this would happen is truly incredible, but it has, and there's nothing any of us can do about it.

    And that's the memo.

    ===============

    Now, send those emails, please...consistently.

    sKally

  • gsx1138
    gsx1138

    I love Bill but I totally disagree with his belief that religion is needed for the world to find its moral compass. Most of the immoral things going on in the world are the result of religion. Morality is not the result of religion.

  • puzzled
  • puzzled
    puzzled

    I tried clicking on the links but only got Error

    So I embeded the page, hope you don't mind.

    Thanks sf for the article.

    Interesting.

    A LOT of focus this entire year has been centered on children and molestation.

    The begining of the new ML Is going to mark a lot of BIG changes in not only the Judicial system but religion.

    Edited by - puzzled on 17 August 2002 19:59:48

  • Bodhisattva
    Bodhisattva

    The North Penn Mosque in Lansdale, Pennsylvania - about 40 miles north of Philadelphia - immediately made a clear condemnation of the terrorist attacks of September 11th. As best I know, it was mentioned - once - on the local TV news. Given the lack of coverage, many mosques could have condemned the attacks, even, like North Penn, without weasel words about the Palestinian issue, and we would not know it. We implicitly acknowledge mosques are largely independent when we say 'they two terror suspects prayed at the same mosque,' yet we somehow expect Islam to nominate a pope or two to make a statement.

    Like most Americans, I find it disturbing when condemnations of terror come with defenses of it, and I want to slap the goobers who show up on news interviews and talk about Palestine in the same breath as claiming that what UBL did went against Islam. But there have been condemnations from some quarters - now O'Reilly is asking for demonstrations. What for? Do we expect middle-class blacks to demonstrate to say, 'we've more or less overcome'? Do we expect Arkansans to haev a rally and say 'we don't marry our sisters as much anymore'? If Muslims demonstrated to say 'we don't support terror,' Bill would accuse them of having a whiney victim complex.

    The dog of the dolphins has flippers.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit