Found an interesting web site here, linked from freeminds.org: [url] http://www.stormloader.com/shaun/xfiles.htm[/url]
Brother B basically told the GB a few home truths and was removed for his efforts.
A couple of things I found interesting:
The society did of course contact the local elders regarding
Brother B's letters. In their letter they said the following:
It is not uncommon for responsible brothers in the field to send us their observations and recommendations. Such comments are most welcomed and are often very helpful and revealing. In fact, on occasion it is not uncommon for us to write to respected elders in various geographic locations asking for their observations.
This is interesting in view of the current situation on child abuse. Is it reasonable that such a serious matter would not be enquired into by the society? Would they not receive letters on this subject from "responsible brothers"? So much for claims that the society is somehow not aware of local elders going against society policy on reporting. The spiders in the centre feel the vibrations in the web, alright.
The second thing is in the interrogation of Brother B. The CO states in reply to a question on whether it's OK to question the society:
Yes, as long as you do not challenge the society.
My translation: you may ask how, what, where or when to do things, but you may not ask the all important why. And you must accept our answers.
Any question which will lead to a rational discussion of the pros and cons of the society's doctrines is therefore a "challenge". Only questions that result in further control of the questioner are permitted.
Brother B was removed. From reading his letters, I think concern for
the rank and file is the dominant tone, not challenge. Only a totalitarian regime views questions as challenges.
Expatbrit.