Doctrine of "Family Merit", VS Animal Merit.
The Watchtower January 15 1971 pp. 63-64
Questions from Readers
At 1 Corinthians 7:14 the Bible shows that God can consider as "holy" the minor children of a Christian parent. Though they are young and not yet to the point of being personally responsible to Jehovah, their parent is trying to develop in them a love of God and of the way of righteousness. It seems clear that at the time of the destructive war of Armageddon God will preserve them on the basis of the . . . family merit . . . of the Christian parent, even though the children are not yet dedicated and baptized. (end quote)
If there is such a thing as "family merit" as the Watchtower Corporation writes, there must have been "animal merit" for the animals of Noah's flood fame. And for those animals failing to gain a boat ride there would have had to have been "animal de-merit".
Was Noah a Jew? Why did he take a pig pair on the ark or were they a late creation? If he did take a pig pair was there doctrine called "pig merit"? Was there a ferret on the ark who got there by ferret merit?
What if the family's name was Merit? Then that would be "Merit merit". Or a parent named Mary would make it "Mary Merit merit".
Comments? Additions?
gb