The Paducah Sun on 1-28-01 stated: (enfasis is mine):
Both Brown and Moreno said that the elders, who volunteer and are essentially untrained clergy, might err in their application of a policy both believe puts protecting children first.
"It's a matter of trying to balance confidentialityand protecting the child," Brown said. "It's not always easy. Have mistakes been made? Very likely, they have........"
Do elders get an "Elders Untrained Clergy Degree?"
If they are "untrained" why should they deserve to have the same conifentiality like Catholic Priests for confessions? They shouldn't.
In addition how do they define PROTECTING THE CHILD? A Kangaroo court does not cut it. It doesnot protect the children. This has been proven in many cases. It only protects them & their name.
Changes need to be done. ASAP. They are trying to hide by using a 'church' coverup. State laws need to be changed to protect the children.
What is your input?