U.S. Sent Iraq Germs in Mid-'80s

by Larry 8 Replies latest jw friends

  • Larry
    Larry

    http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20020923/1048504.asp

    U.S. Sent Iraq Germs in Mid-'80s

    By DOUGLAS TURNER
    News Washington Bureau Chief - FOREIGN POLICY
    9/23/2002

    WASHINGTON - American research companies, with the approval of two previous presidential administrations, provided Iraq biological cultures that could be used for biological weapons, according to testimony to a U.S. Senate committee eight years ago.

    West Nile Virus, E. coli, anthrax and botulism were among the potentially fatal biological cultures that a U.S. company sent under U.S. Commerce Department licenses after 1985, when Ronald Reagan was president, according to the Senate testimony.

    The Commerce Department under the first Bush administration also authorized eight shipments of cultures that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention later classified as having "biological warfare significance."

    Between 1985 and 1989, the Senate testimony shows, Iraq received at least 72 U.S. shipments of clones, germs and chemicals ranging from substances that could destroy wheat crops, give children and animals the bone-deforming disease rickets, to a nerve gas rated a million times more lethal than Sarin.

    Disclosures about such shipments in the late 1980s not only highlight questions about old policies but pose new ones, such as how well the American military forces would be protected against such an arsenal - if one exists - should the United States invade Iraq.

    Testimony on these shipments was offered in 1994 to the Senate Banking Committee headed by then-Sens. Donald Riegle Jr., D-Mich., and Alfonse M. D'Amato, R-N.Y., who were critics of the policy. The testimony, which occurred during hearings that were held about the poor health of some returning Gulf War veterans, was brought to the attention of The Buffalo News by associates of Riegle.

    The committee oversees the work of the U.S. Export Administration of the Commerce Department, which licensed the shipments of the dangerous biological agents.

    "Saddam (Hussein) took full advantage of the arrangement," Riegle said in an interview with The News late last week. "They seemed to give him anything he wanted. Even so, it's right out of a science fiction movie as to why we would send this kind of stuff to anybody."

    The new Bush administration, he said, claims Hussein is adding to his bioweapons capability.

    "If that's the case, then the issue needs discussion and clarity," Riegle said. "But it's not something anybody wants to talk about."

    The shipments were sent to Iraq in the late 1980s, when that country was engaged in a war with Iran, and Presidents Reagan and George Bush were trying to diminish the influence of a nation that took Americans hostages a decade earlier and was still aiding anti-Israeli terrorists.

    "Iraq was considered an ally of the U.S. in the 1980s," said Nancy Wysocki, vice president for public relations for one of the U.S. organizations that provided the materials to Hussein's regime.

    "All these (shipments) were properly licensed by the government, otherwise they would not have been sent," said Wysocki, who works for American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va., a nonprofit bioinformatics firm.

    The shipments not only raise serious questions about the wisdom of former administrations, Riegle said, but also questions about what steps the Defense Department is taking to protect American military personnel against Saddam's biological arsenal in the event of an invasion.

    Riegle said there are 100,000 names on a national registry of gulf veterans who have reported illnesses they believe stem from their tours of duty there.

    "Some of these people, who went over there as young able-bodied Americans, are now desperately ill," he said. "Some of them have died."

    "One of the obvious questions for today is: How has our Defense Department adjusted to this threat to our own troops?" he said. "How might this potential war proceed differently so that we don't have the same outcome?

    "How would our troops be protected? What kind of sensors do we have now? In the Gulf War, the battlefield sensors went off tens of thousands of times. The Defense Department says they were false alarms."

    U.S. bioinformatics firms in the 1980s received requests from a wide variety of Iraqi agencies, all claiming the materials were intended for civilian research purposes.

    The congressional testimony from 1994 cites an American Type shipment in 1985 to the Iraq Ministry of Higher Education of a substance that resembles tuberculosis and influenza and causes enlargement of the liver and spleen. It can also infect the brain, lungs, heart and spinal column. The substance is called histoplasma capsulatum.

    American Type also provided clones used in the development of germs that would kill plants. The material went to the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission, which the U.S. government says is a front for Saddam's military.

    An organization called the State Company for Drug Industries received a pneumonia virus, and E. coli, salmonella and staphylcoccus in August 1987 under U.S. license, according to the Senate testimony. The country's Ministry of Trade got 33 batches of deadly germs, including anthrax and botulism in 1988.

    Ten months after the first President Bush was inaugurated in 1988, an unnamed U.S. firm sent eight substances, including the germ that causes strep throat, to Iraq's University of Basrah.

    An unnamed office in Basrah, Iraq, got "West Nile Fever Virus" from an unnamed U.S. company in 1985, the Senate testimony shows.

    While there is no proof that the recent outbreak of West Nile virus in the United States stemmed from anything Iraq did, Riegle said, "You have to ask yourself, might there be a connection?"

    Researchers at the Center for Strategic and International Studies said American companies were not the only ones that sent anthrax cultures to Iraq. British firms sold cultures to the University of Baghdad that were transferred to the Iraqi military, the Center for Strategic and International Studies said. The Swiss also sent cultures.

    The data on American shipments of deadly biological agents to Iraq was developed for the Senate Banking Committee in the winter of 1994 by the panel's chief investigator, James Tuite, and other staffers, and entered into the committee record May 25, 1994.

    The committee was trying to establish that thousands of service personnel were harmed by exposure to Iraqi chemical weapons during the Gulf War, particularly following a U.S. air attack on a munitions dump - a theory that the Defense Department and much of official Washington have always downplayed.

    Bureau assistant Diana Moore and News researcher Andrew Bailey contributed to this article.

    e-mail: dturner&buffnews.com

  • Bendrr
    Bendrr

    So what's your point? Are you trying to say that since we supplied some of the materials for Iraq's biological weapons that we should not turn around now and wage a war to eliminate Saddam Hussein?

    The 80's were a different time. Iraq was supported then because they were at war with Iran. If the Reagan administration let Saddam have supplies like the article says, they had a good reason at the time.

    Damn! I sure wish all this had happened under America's Greatest President, The Great Ronald Reagan. If it had, the U.S. would probably have an additional state or two in the Middle East and gas would be less than a buck a gallon.

    Col. Bendrr, [classified]

  • gsx1138
    gsx1138

    The point is that our past is coming back to bite us in the ass. While I liked Ronny as well he did plenty of stupid things, this being one of them. Of course, considering he gave the intelligence agencies and military free reign it is likely this was another thing he didn't know about. The 80's may have been a different time but that doesn't mean we won't make the same dumb ass mistakes again.

  • teejay
    teejay

    Old news. Very (20 year?) old news.

    New question: where did Bin Laden and al-Quaida learn their terrorist techniques? Who trained them? And why?

  • Bendrr
    Bendrr

    GSX, yes it may be considered our past actions biting us in the ass. Who would have even thought back then that the situation would be what it is today? But the fact that the U.S. may have helped Iraq along in their bio-weapons program doesn't change the fact that now Iraq does pose a clear and present danger and that danger must be neutralized.

    Col. Bendrr, [classified]

  • gsx1138
    gsx1138

    I certainly don't disagree with that Bendrr. I also think Saddam needs a his ass kicked. If for anything to help the Iraqi people because they are the ones getting the worste of it.

  • Pork Chop
    Pork Chop

    CDC said that supplying the types of material that went to Iraq has been standard practice and that they've sent similar stuff to many countries. The media is trying to make something out of very little.

  • Crazy151drinker
    Crazy151drinker

    Why didnt REAGAN's kids turn out right??? Shit if we a GOOD Ronny Junior we would have taken out Iraq a month ago! F the UN! Ronny didnt need anyones permission! Ahhhh the good ol days of being the Global Bully.....

  • conoroberst
    conoroberst

    I would imagine the posters point was to comment upon the hypocrisy of the US government in denouncing Iraq for "secretly" holding WMD when the US sold the damn things to them in the first place, and the British and Americans trained their leaders and military commanders.

    How they decry Iraq for not allowing weapons inspectors in, whilst at the same time not allowing weapons inspectors into their own arsenals.

    The most war-mongering nation in the world (name one more so) criticizes Iraq for being a threat to world peace and threatens to impose a regime change that will bring in a sunni-muslim (possibly puppet) administration that will lead to even greater international instability.

    At the same time inflaming the Arab world by preventing and vetoing UN resoltions that criticize in any way shape or form a country that has consistently flouted and shown disdain for UN resolutions, (and we are not talking about Iraw here, we are talking about Israel).

    Shame on the US Government for it's hypocrisy and shame on the American people for allowing the travesty of a democratic election that took place shape who is the most powerful man in the earth today.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit