The catholic priest made the news again in Sundays paper- Nothing on the silent lambs WT march.
Sundays New York Times
by kelsey007 5 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
Searchin50
Yes I noticed that also no media coverage,very odd.
I suppose the JWS are not as important as they think.
A scripture they always used regarding themselves,
1 COR: 4:9 what a joke, tickles me
Searchin50
-
Mulan
When the reporters went inside, one by one, they were likely warned not to report.............some threat was made. It's the only thing that makes sense. This should have had some media reports, with all the cameras that were there. Very odd.
-
expatbrit
Did anyone talk to the reporters after they came out of the Watchtower building?
Can anyone contact them now and find out why they didn't publish?
Expatbrit
-
safe4kids
There was a short article published in today's Brooklyn Journal. I didn't have a chance to purchase one as I didn't find out about it until it was time to leave for the airport, and I was in Manhattan with no time to go back across the river. Hopefully, some of the folks who were staying another day will be able to get the article and post it here on the board. I know that the BJ (oops, I'm snickerin' here ) isn't the Times, but hey, at least SOMEONE published the story.
Dana
-
mundodatorre
Mulan,
what you said makes sense to me. I don't know who said that "when the reporters came back, one said that those men are pure evil", but when I didn't see any media coverage I made the connection. Someone inside there must have made some threat somehow.
I just wonder what kind of argumentation they must have used since reporters know they're protected under the freedom of speech in this country and this, I suppose, applies specially to the press.
What do you think?
Observador.
http://www.observandoomundo.com
PS: From now on I'll be posting using the alias and username "Observador".
Edited by - mundodatorre on 1 October 2002 14:25:48