Is the Bible self-evident? Why join the JW then?

by Gerard 3 Replies latest jw friends

  • Gerard
    Gerard

    I found this article in which the WT dismisses the possibility of hidden messages, codes and prophecies in the Bible. Yet the WT claims one must resort to their teachings in order to understand the Bible. But in this phrase they imply the Bible is self-evident:

    "The concept of a Bible code has its roots in Jewish mysticism, utilizing "artfully contrived" methods that obscure and distort the plain meaning of the Bible's inspired text. The Hebrew Scriptures themselves unequivocally condemned such a mystical approach."

    http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2000/4/1a/article_01.htm

    If there are no hidden codes and messages, how can they simultaneously sell the idea of Armageddon happening on specific (and failed) dates? Isnt it a "mystical approach" to claim to be the sole channel to God when the Bible says nothing bout a building in Brooklin?

    It goes on with: "This [JW instruction] is far better than trying to learn about our Creator by searching for hidden messages that are the products of private interpretation."

    This is laughable as past WT presidents created a cult based on their own private interpretations. This doctrine is a world of contradictions and amazes me it still flourishes without much critical though by most new recruits.

    A penny for your houghts. Cheers,

    Gerry

    Edited by - Gerard on 15 October 2002 18:2:44

  • pomegranate
    pomegranate

    maybe dats da way it post ta bee?

  • A Paduan
    A Paduan

    Peter wrote that "it was not by following artfully contrived false stories that we acquainted you with the power and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ." ( 2 Peter 1:16) The concept of a Bible code has its roots in Jewish mysticism, utilizing "artfully contrived" methods that obscure and distort the plain meaning of the Bible's inspired text. The Hebrew Scriptures themselves unequivocally condemned such a mystical approach.Deuteronomy 13:1-5; 18:9-13.

    So who plainly understood that the faithful and discreet slave was actually a group of modern Americans that were specially chosen by God? I just didn't plainly hear it that way - somehow I don't think Peter did either.

    As for quoting those Deut 13:1-5 - bizarre - they really have come to expect people to be absolute pushovers.

    paduan

    Edited by - a paduan on 15 October 2002 18:58:38

  • pomegranate
    pomegranate

    errrr...6 million of em.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit