Scientology is a template of ultimate Mind Control: Here are some books exposing the methods and madness

by TerryWalstrom 6 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • TerryWalstrom
    TerryWalstrom

    PDF links to anti-Scientology books

    http://exscientologistsireland.org/wp/about-the-scientology-organisation/books/

    _______________

    It was 1950, in the early, heady days of Dianetics, soon after L. Ron Hubbard opened the doors of his first organization to the clamoring crowd. Up until then, Hubbard was known only to readers of pulp fiction, but now he had an instant best-seller with a book that promised to solve every problem of the human mind, and the cash was pouring in. Hubbard found it easy to create schemes to part his new following from their money. One of the first tasks was to arrange "grades" of membership, offering supposedly greater rewards, at increasingly higher prices. Over thirty years later. an associate wryly remembered Hubbard turning to him and confiding, no doubt with a smile, "Let's sell these people a piece of blue sky."

    _______________________

    After 14 years and a senior officer posting in the Church of Scientology Cyril Vosper investigates and condemns SCIENTOLOGY was founded by former science-fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard. It has grown into an international cult whose network of cells is devoted to 'pulling the society under us'. At the end of the Sixties, Cyril Vosper was declared a SUPPRESSIVE PERSON to his fellow Scientologists, whereby he could be 'deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist - tricked, sued or lied to, or destroyed'. Finally he was declared in a condition of ENEMY. His marriage broke down and he was separated from his children. Vosper has struck back with this book. It immediately became subject to a writ from the Scientologists seeking to restrain its publication. After a bitter court action, the Scientologists have lost their case.

    ______________________________

    There are two wildly conflicting versions of the life story of L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the Church of Scientology, The first, promoted by the Church, is that he was an unfailingly honest, generous humanitarian whose profound insights have transformed the world. The second, propounded in its fullest form in Bare-Faced Messiah by Russell Miller, is that he was a pathological liar, a fraud consumed by greed and paranoia who sucked literally millions of people into an extraordinary fantasy world. The quotation above is one was one of Hubbard's favourite aphorisms, highlighting his claim that subjective truth is all that matters. If that's correct, then either account is equally plausible. But if objective truth is at all important, relying on evidence and reason rather than pure belief, then BareFaced Messiah is considerably more convincing. I have provided links between Miller's account of Hubbard's life and that of the Church of Scientology (on their Web site, http://www.lronhubbard.org). Compare and contrast the two biographies, look at the supporting evidence and then decide for yourself. Why is the biography of L. Ron Hubbard important in the first place? The obvious reason is that it calls into question the whole validity of Scientology. Some Scientologists have acknowledged privately that Hubbard's official biography may be inaccurate, but that it doesn't invalidate his work. That may be so, but for those who take this view, consider this point: as a great deal of the inaccuracies in his biography originate with the man himself, what else was he inaccurate about? If Hubbard lied about his life, what else did he lie about? This argument is, incidentally, not one that is lost on the leadership of the Church of Scientology; Russell Miller faced considerable harassment and legal action from the Church before it was possible to publish Bare-Faced Messiah. The court which permitted him to do so in Britain pointed out, quite correctly, that Hubbard was a figure of considerable public interest whose reputation was used by the Church to promote itself - and that a biography of his life was therefore prima facie in the public interest. Bare-Faced Messiah is out of print now, but this argument remains no less strong. That is why I have reproduced the book on the Web, with Mr Miller's permission; not because I have any desire to damage the Church of Scientology but because I believe strongly that it is in the public interest to make his well-researched book available to a wider audience. Here for the first time, then, is an electronic version of Bare-Faced Messiah.

  • pepperheart
    pepperheart

    hi if you go on youtube bbc,itv and c4 have all done programes over 30 years about

    sciencetology

  • TerryWalstrom
    TerryWalstrom

    Thank you, pepperheart

    I have been listening to podcasts in which former Scientologists talk about what went on in their past

    as an active member of Scientology. My take-away from these confessionals is this: MIND CONTROL is so very tragic and real--and. . . I was once a victim of it.

  • OrphanCrow
    OrphanCrow

    Terry, have you ever had the opportunity to view the movie "The Master"?

    http://www.wired.com/2012/09/the-master-review/


    Review: The Master Elegantly Dissects Cult Psychosis
    BEAUTIFUL TO LOOK at, strangely hypnotic and utterly original, The Master examines cult dynamics through the ’50s-era misadventures of a violent ex-sailor with horrible posture and zero impulse control.
    Filmmaking artistry aside, writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson‘s picture hits home as a period-perfect examination of a perpetually recurring truth: When people hanker for a know-it-all authority figure who will tell them what to think, self-appointed “masters” will be more than happy to oblige.
    Anderson brings cult behavior into fascinating focus by examining the bond between two characters portrayed by extraordinary actors: the accidental, alcoholic seeker Freddie Quill, played by Joaquin Phoenix, and the suave, all-American swami Lancaster Dodd, played by Philip Seymour Hoffman.

    ...read more about the movie by following the link...

    The movie is apparently based upon Ron Hubbard and his mind control methods. I found it to be a disturbing movie that is all too real in its depiction of mind control tactics. Chilling. I highly recommend it - but for anyone who could be triggered by past experiences with cult control....you might not want to watch it. I found parts of it difficult to watch.

  • Sofia Lose
    Sofia Lose

    Now, that's serious mind control!

    JWs are nothing in comparison. So, quit your whining!!!

    SL

  • OrphanCrow
    OrphanCrow
    SophiaLose:
    Now, that's serious mind control!
    JWs are nothing in comparison. So, quit your whining!!!

    Jehovah's Witnesses are told to give up their life for the WTS' blood god. And they will even lay their children on the altar of the blood god.

    How much more serious do you want it to get???? How much more serious can it get?

  • TerryWalstrom
    TerryWalstrom

    I did see THE MASTER. Had I not expected (for some reason) a takedown of Lafayette Ron Hubbard, I would have loved it.
    Hoffman is never less than dazzling.
    It was certainly a very odd film and extremely interesting.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit