I don't know why this person is saying this (to me) mad sort of statement. Where is this information coming from? What evidence is he/she citing? Why is this person now saying it after so much considered and well constructed evidence was delivered?
Is this a person with a good back ground in commenting?
This commission is not over. It may have finished it's public airing, as is normal. However, the commission now goes from state to state. There are over fifty people to be contacted and they have all come from different states. I speak from personal fact. Now the "issues" and the severity of those issues are out, in the public eye...........Now another sort of collecting of evidence is to start. This means all those who came forward "me included" have been contacted and informed of what the next phase will be.
Recall: There were over fifty people who wrote in, phoned in, sent emails.........that number very likely grew as people watched the disdain with which they were viewed as those camera's rolled.
They the RC, made a point of contacting everyone and reassuring them. Plus they assigned them a case worker and further contact details..........