J.R. Brown SLANDERS Barbara Anderson

by UnDisfellowshipped 8 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped
    Below is a Timeline of Newspaper Quotes in which J.R. Brown lied about and slandered Barbara Anderson:

    WashingtonPost.com News (Associated Press AP) - May 11th 2002:

    In Brief

    Saturday, May 11, 2002; Page B08

    Ouster Looms for Critics Of Sex Abuse Policy

    J.R. Brown, a national spokesman for the Jehovah's Witnesses, confirmed that the four had been called to the hearings, but he said the proceedings may focus on "sins" unrelated to public comments on sexual abuse. He provide no specifics.

    The judicial committees will decide whether the four should be "disfellowshipped," the group's term for excommunication.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Tennessean Newspaper - May 11th 2002:

    Abuse charges put Witness at risk of shunning

    Barbara Anderson, of the Manchester Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, faces possible disciplinary action.

    By LEON ALLIGOOD
    and EMILY HEFFTER
    Staff Writers

    ''What she [Barbara Anderson] alleges is not true at all,'' said J.R. Brown, a spokesman for the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc., the incorporated name of the Jehovah's Witnesses.

    Brown said he had been talking to Dateline about the show's story for a year but said he and other organization leaders did not know which members television producers had interviewed.

    ''We have no idea what she told Dateline,'' Brown said of Anderson.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Tullahoma News - May 11th 2002:

    Whistleblower could lose her church, family

    MARY REEVES, Special to The News May 11, 2002

    In an interview with the New York Post, JW spokesperson J.R. Brown stated that the threatened excommunications had nothing to do with the Dateline interview and that "church headquarters had no idea that these people would be on the show."

    Yet research displayed more than six internet announcements on the program, updates and names, all linked to the Silent Lambs and the Watchtower sites.

    Brown also said that local congregation decided to charge the members with various spiritual violations.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    TORONTO STAR Newspaper - May 10th 2002:

    Sex scandal hits church

    Four Jehovah's Witnesses face ouster for protest

    In a statement issued from their headquarters, the Jehovah's Witnesses said church leaders are "required by the Holy Scriptures to see to it that the congregation remains clean and unified."
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    New York Post Newspaper - May 9th 2002:

    FOUR FACING JEHOVAH OUSTER

    By DAN MANGAN

    May 9, 2002 -- Jehovah's Witnesses leaders are moving to excommunicate four people who have spoken to a television show about child molestation within the church, the four say.

    If that happens, they claim, other Jehovah's Witnesses will be barred - also under the threat of excommunication - from watching the upcoming NBC "Dateline" episode detailing alleged abuse in the church and criticism of how the church handles such cases.

    A spokesman for the Brooklyn-based religion called that claim "absurd."

    Both sides agree that all Witnesses - including relatives of the four - would risk excommunication by having contact with any excommunicated person, except under certain circumstances.

    While the four believe the show's impending broadcast has spurred the church's actions, church spokesman J.R. Brown said that before Tuesday, church headquarters had no idea that these people would be on the show.

    He also said local congregations decided to charge them with various spiritual violations.
    -----------------------------------------------------------

    KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia News - May 9th 2002:

    http://library.northernlight.com/EC20020509450000047.html?cb=0&dx=1006&sc=0#doc

    Title: Religion News in Brief

    Source: AP Online
    Date: 05/09/2002 12:03
    Price: Free
    Document Size: Short (1 or 2 pages)
    Document ID: EC20020509450000047
    Subject(s): Religion columns
    Religious studies
    Document Type: Articles & General info

    Jehovah's Witnesses say they may be ousted over sex abuse comments

    J.R. Brown, a national spokesman for the Jehovah's Witnesses, confirmed the four had been called to the hearings, but he said the proceedings may focus on ``sins'' unrelated to any public comments on sexual abuse. He would not provide specifics.

    The judicial committees will decide if the four should be ``disfellowshipped,'' the religious group's term for excommunication.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    The Courier-Journal Newspaper - May 8th 2002:

    Jehovah's Witnesses act against abuse-policy critics

    By Peter Smith, [email protected]

    In its statement, the Jehovah's Witnesses Office of Public Information quoted biblical references in saying elders must use church discipline to ''shepherd the flock of God in their care.''

    ''In fact, they are required by the Holy Scriptures to see to it that the congregation remains clean and unified,'' the statement said. ''No hasty decision is made in this process.''

    The goal is not to expel a member, but to follow the Apostle Paul's injunction to ''try to readjust such a man in a spirit of mildness,'' the statement said.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------

  • archangel01
    archangel01

    Whats there too rejust?If the WTC followed the bible and turn the abuses into the police for proper justice none of this would have happen.The WTC is in a BIG mess and now they can't climb out so easily this time, because people are really pissed now because kids are being hurt.I think you can only push someone so far that nothing matters any more and you have nothing to gain or lose.Its all about JUSTICE now and the WTC seems to be forgetting about that.

    Edited by - archangel01 on 25 December 2002 7:27:27

  • No Apologies
    No Apologies

    Unfortunately for the Watchtower, they are not used to being forced to defend their actions. J.R. Brown does not seem to realize that just because a loyal witness will believe anything he says as if it came straight from heaven, a reporter will not. Of course, maybe that's why he is afraid to go on a live interview, he knows he would be nailed to the wall so fast.

    Of course, they also have no idea how their statements are being documented and will come back to haunt them.

    I really would like to know what they told the reporters that they invited inside the day of the Silentlambs march.

  • nightwarrior
    nightwarrior

    Just a brief comment , i beleive that there are two laws which jehovahs witnesses have to live by

    1) gods law

    1) & the secular law of the land they find themselves living in

    ,pay to ceasar what is ceasars, therfore if one doesnot abide by the simple laws of the land which deem to have been broken by certain members of the j.w. (fraternity) pertaining to child molestation ( paedophiles )they are going against jehovahs wishes by trying to hide there abundance of sins under a camouflage of deceit,the difference is that some organizations step over the boundarys of justice in a perverse way ,thereby claiming that they are doing things gods way contrary to gods teachings ,therefore confusing the issue of soverienty which jehovah has already decreed within the scriptures,therefore man cannot hide from jehovahs truth but they continue to twist the way things should be done and seen to be done ,

    Where in the scriptures does it say to rape maim & bugger little children?????????????????????????????/

    Then cover over the transgresors deeds

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    I still don't see the slander or libel in any of these newspaper reports you have provided. None. Read then carefully.

    This part of the case will be tough to win.

    hawk

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    J.R. Brown stated at least 4 times I believe, that Barbara Anderson was being charged with "sins" which "have nothing to do with speaking out against child abuse" or Dateline.

    Also, I believe in one Newspaper which I did not post above, J.R. Brown stated that Barbara Anderson was being called before a Judicial Committee because of "sins" found at 1st Corinthians 5:11.

    J.R. Brown also stated that Barbara Anderson was a liar ("What she [Barbara Anderson] alleges is not true at all").

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    Webster's Dictionary Definition of Slander:

    1: the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation
    2: a false and defamatory oral statement about a person
    --------------------------------

    Webster's Dictionary Definition of Libel:

    1: a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression
    1b (1): a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt
    1b (2): defamation of a person by written or representational means
    1b (3): the publication of blasphemous, treasonable, seditious, or obscene writings or pictures

    Edited by - UnDisfellowshipped on 30 December 2002 17:10:20

  • hamptonite21
    hamptonite21

    JR BROWN IS A SNAKE IN THE GRASS

  • rocketman
    rocketman

    Sounds at least somewhat slanderous to me. A reader would conclude (if one were to believe JR Brown) that Anderson has committed some other "sin" and any reader aquainted with Witness teachings would then possibly think of her as a person guilty of, say, fornication, drunkeness, smoking, stealing, or any of the number of other "sins" for which one can be df'd. According to the definitions posted on Slander and Libel, the stuff Brown says would apepar to fit under just about all those possible definitions.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit