Was Jesus A (Suspected) TERRORIST?

by cellomould 2 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  cellomould

  Jesus said that 'two swords were enough'. For what?

  Well, the answer to that question is also likely the real cause of the Romans' suspicion of Jesus. People may say that Jesus was executed like a common criminal. But the Romans were brutal in their treatment of Jewish resistance militia and sympathizers.

  Here's a little snippet from a darned good article, but you must read more to see where this is going:

  The strong influence of the prophesy of Zechariah on Jesus is shown by his mode of entrance into Jerusalem riding on an ass's colt. Such deliberate fulfillment of Zechariah ix. 9 suggests that Jesus also had the rest of Zechariah's prophesies in mind.

  "The people that have fought against Jerusalem" were none other than the Romans, the heathen barbarians who had united "the nations" in a great empire and had set their faces against God. He himself, Jesus of Nazareth, was the person to whom the prophet was addressing his instructions; the Messiah who would arrive in Jerusalem on an ass's colt, and would stand in "the valley of the mountains" together with a company of "saints" to witness the appearance of the glory of God on the Mount of Olives. He would see the Romans stricken by a plague, and would lead "Judah" in fighting against them. Then, after a great victory, he would reign as King-Messiah in Jerusalem, where every year on the anniversary of his victory he would welcome representatives of every nation on earth, coming to pay homage to the Lord of Hosts in his Temple.

  http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/maccoby.htm

  Oh, here's another snippet about terrorism in ancient Rome:

  In the 80s BC, Hellenistic king Mithridates called on his followers to kill all Roman citizens in their midst, naming a specific day for the slaughter. They heeded the call - and killed 80,000 Romans in local communities across Greece. "The Romans were incredibly shocked by this," says ancient historian Jeremy Paterson of Newcastle University. "It's a little bit like the statements in so many of the American newspapers since September 11: 'Why are we hated so much?' "

  http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,794163,00.html

  cellmould
• 

  Satanus

  Interesting article. I will finish reading it later.

  There is no indication in the New Testament of any conflict between Jewish religion and Roman power. In fact, the whole issue of Roman power is played down to such an extent that there is hardly a hint of any opposition to Rome.

  Logically, as the occupier, rome was 'babylon', the oppressor, as babylon and egypt had been. Could roman agents have edited out the anti-rome retoric. Was paul a roman agent, who was responsible for changing the description of the direction that jesus' movement had taken? Or were nt writings edited later on by other roman agents? Anyway, it's something i will think about.

  SS
• 

  cellomould

  Yeah, it's an intereting article...since the WT always drummed into our heads that Jesus' ministry was NOT A POLITICAL movement.