For those of you who do not have a copy of Michael Van Buskirk's 1976 Study:
http://www.jwstudies.com/Scholastic_Dishonesty-_Buskirk_-searchable-.pdf
Doug
by Doug Mason 5 Replies latest watchtower bible
For those of you who do not have a copy of Michael Van Buskirk's 1976 Study:
http://www.jwstudies.com/Scholastic_Dishonesty-_Buskirk_-searchable-.pdf
Doug
I've never seen that work before.
Thank you
George
Vidiot,
From time to time, several of us have pointed to the misquotations, selective quotations, misrepresentations and such as in the area of neo-Babylonian chronology:
http://www.jwstudies.com/Response_from_John_Steele.pdf
http://www.jwstudies.com/The_June_2012_Awake_Citation_of_Ephraim_Stern.pdf
http://www.jwstudies.com/JWN_thread_re_June_12_2012_Awake.pdf
etc., etc.
A very recent complaint was (again) made by George Howard on the WTS's use of his work to substantiate their (mis)use of "Jehovah" throughout their NT.
http://www.jwstudies.com/Reply_to_M_P_by_Professor_Howard.pdf
Doug
Thank you.
x
Like I keep saying... if you have to cheat to defend your beliefs, your beliefs don't deserve to be defended.