WHY THE WATCHTOWER TREATS MEN LIKE DONKEYS OF BURDEN

by raymond frantz 8 Replies latest jw experiences

  • raymond frantz
    raymond frantz

    https://youtu.be/tpPmprDXxzw?si=Shh5vKmuzFP6C9_m

    So the Watchtower has come out with sn article, study article 2 in their newly released Study Watchtower magazine for 2025 and we see from the start how they keep perpetuating the same old outdated narrative that when it comes to marriages the husband is the one at fault, we'll thats I think when I read paragraph from this article where I man has to work on a whole list of things and not once the wife is instructed to do any of these things, but let's just read together paragraph 14:

    A husband who physically or verbally abuses his wife needs to take additional steps to repair his relationship with Jehovah and with his wife. What are these steps? First, he recognizes that he has a serious problem. Nothing is hidden from Jehovah’s sight. (Ps. 44:21; Eccl. 12:14; Heb. 4:13) Second, he stops abusing his wife and changes his behavior. (Prov. 28:13) Third, he apologizes to his wife and to Jehovah and seeks their forgiveness. (Acts 3:19) He should also beg Jehovah for both the desire to change and the help to control his thoughts, speech, and actions. (Ps. 51:10-12; 2 Cor. 10:5; Phil. 2:13) Fourth, he acts in harmony with his prayers by learning to hate all forms of violence and abusive speech. (Ps. 97:10) Fifth, he seeks immediate help from loving shepherds in the congregation. (Jas. 5:14-16) Sixth, he develops a plan that will help him to avoid all such behavior in the future. A husband who views pornography should follow these same steps. Jehovah will bless his efforts to change his behavior. (Ps. 37:5) But it is not enough for a husband to reject dishonorable conduct. He also needs to learn to show honor to his wife. How can he do that?

    In this paragraph, the Watchtower seems to take us on a guided tour back in time with its traditional, almost antiquated perspective on marriage, where the husband is tasked with not only mending his mistakes but also constantly appeasing and accommodating his wife's needs. It's as if, in the Watchtower’s ideal marriage, the wife is a delicate, innocent creature, perpetually in need of care, understanding, and endless apologies. Meanwhile, the husband shoulders all the blame for relationship issues and must go through an extensive, almost ritualistic process to redeem himself—complete with a checklist that reads more like a medieval penance guide than modern relationship advice. Let's explore for a moment this skewed portrayal of responsibility in this perspective and highlight Watchtower's outdated gender dynamics that, in 2025, feel like they belong in a dusty old rulebook.

    First, let’s unpack the premise: "A husband who physically or verbally abuses his wife needs to take additional steps to repair his relationship with Jehovah and his wife." While it’s undoubtedly a good thing that abusive behavior is condemned, this paragraph places all the responsibility squarely on the husband's shoulders. It implies that men alone are the ones to blame in marital discord, and it is always they who must take the initiative to fix things. There's no recognition of the complexities of modern relationships, where accountability often falls on both partners and where a successful marriage is typically built on mutual respect and shared effort. In 2025, it’s hard to ignore that women, too, play a significant role in the dynamics of a relationship. But here, they are strangely absent from any accountability, cast instead as passive recipients of the husband's actions and behaviors.

    Next, let’s take a look at the steps the Watchtower proposes. The husband must first “recognize that he has a serious problem” and remember that “nothing is hidden from Jehovah’s sight.” This is step one in a six-point rehabilitation plan that makes it clear that the husband alone is in the hot seat. It’s almost like a spiritual version of an anger management workshop—just without any actual tools for communication or emotional intelligence that might actually help both partners. The paragraph then tells him to stop abusing his wife, apologize profusely, pray fervently, and reach out to congregation elders. Each step paints the husband as not only the perpetrator but also the sole fixer, while his wife is conveniently positioned as the injured party, free from any need for growth or responsibility herself.

    Now, don’t get me wrong—stopping abusive behaviour, apologizing, and seeking help are all positive steps. But the real issue here is the oversimplified and one-sided portrayal of a marital relationship. Abuse in any form is, of course, unacceptable and should be addressed with sincerity and urgency. However, the Watchtower’s insistence on placing the blame entirely on the husband paints an unrealistic picture where the wife is perpetually innocent, vulnerable, and passive. It overlooks the complexity of human relationships, where both partners bring their own flaws, struggles, and, yes, responsibilities to the table. Where’s the guidance for women to reflect on their own behaviour, communicate their needs respectfully, or contribute to the relationship’s health?

    Then there’s the statement about pornography, which lumps all husbands who view it into the same category as those who engage in abusive behavior. It’s quite a leap to place both issues under the same "steps to repentance" umbrella. By doing so, the Watchtower equates vastly different behaviors as equally damaging, creating unnecessary shame and guilt. Again, it’s the husband who must grovel and reform himself under the ever-watchful eye of Jehovah and his wife, with no mention of any constructive dialogue between the couple. It’s a dynamic straight out of a bygone era, ignoring the fact that, today, healthy relationships are built on open communication, mutual respect, and shared responsibilities.

    The paragraph wraps up by adding that it’s not enough for the husband to just avoid bad behavior; he also “needs to learn to show honor to his wife.” This, of course, is a commendable sentiment, but it further perpetuates the imbalance. He needs to “honor her” with no corresponding mention of the wife honoring her husband, meeting his needs, or working alongside him to cultivate a loving, balanced relationship. The burden to “do better” is placed entirely on him, implying that only the husband has room for improvement, and his wife is, by default, blameless.

    In 2025, where most people understand that a successful marriage requires both partners to contribute equally, this approach feels laughably outdated. It's as though the Watchtower is operating on an old-fashioned script, where women are delicate flowers, and men are rough rocks that need endless polishing to be worthy of them. Gone is any mention of mutual accountability, shared emotional labor, or reciprocal support. Instead, men are cast as the sole bearers of responsibility for a marriage’s health, while women float along, seemingly without a care in the world other than waiting for their husbands to step up.

    The irony, of course, is that this overly simplistic dynamic does a disservice to both men and women. Men are saddled with an unfair level of blame and responsibility, while women are denied the opportunity to take ownership of their role in the relationship. The paragraph misses the chance to encourage both partners to reflect, grow, and work together to build a harmonious, balanced marriage. Instead, it clings to an outdated model that paints men as perpetual fixers and women as delicate, morally superior beings whose needs must be endlessly met.

    In the end, this guidance from the Watchtower might have been relevant decades ago, but in today’s world, it feels out of touch. Marriage is a partnership, not a one-sided project where only one person needs to “do better” or take responsibility. True intimacy and respect are built on mutual accountability, open communication, and a shared commitment to growth. It’s time the Watchtower acknowledged that in a healthy relationship, both partners have room to improve, contribute, and honor each other—equally.

    https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/watchtower-study-january-2025/Husbands-Honor-Your-Wife/

  • a watcher
    a watcher

    It sounds like the article will be a refreshing change from WTs usual misogyny.

  • Listener
    Listener

    There's lots of valid points you've made raymond frantz.

    They usually follow up with another article, either in the same magazine or the following magazine 'directed' at the wives.

    They are so stupid when it comes to serious topics like this. They've realized there is a need to address the issue again because of the abuse going on and appoint a writer or group of writers to present an article on it. Then, I imagine, the writer doesn't even consider bringing up how the couple should deal with issues together because they are only dealing with the one sex at a time.

    They've listed six steps that an abusive husband needs to take. Being 'steps' they should be all inclusive.

    These are their steps, note that these are the same steps if he is looking at pornography with a few comments by me -

    First, he recognizes that he has a serious problem. Nothing is hidden from Jehovah’s sight. (Ps. 44:21; Eccl. 12:14; Heb. 4:13)

    How is the husband supposed to recognize that he has a problem and a 'serious' one at that? At what point does raising your voice become abusive and when does looking at porn become a serious problem? When it happens once, or twice...? Even a alcoholic often doesn't recognize that he/she has a problem until something significant happens.

    Second, he stops abusing his wife and changes his behavior. (Prov. 28:13)

    Well that was easy. We are only at Step 2 and have the problem solved.

    Third, he apologizes to his wife and to Jehovah and seeks their forgiveness. (Acts 3:19) He should also beg Jehovah for both the desire to change and the help to control his thoughts, speech, and actions. (Ps. 51:10-12; 2 Cor. 10:5; Phil. 2:13)

    Shouldn't this have been step 1?

    There's nothing wrong in this other than the fact that too often, apologies are empty words and the behaviour continues.

    Also, apologizing just isn't enough. A good man would do something kind and sincere to show his sorrow for what he has done.

    Fourth, he acts in harmony with his prayers by learning to hate all forms of violence and abusive speech. (Ps. 97:10)

    That is a lovely sentiment but more than a tough one to enact, if not impossible. We are sinful human beings and we will have bad thoughts. As much as we try, I don't think it is even possible to hate all forms of violence and abusive speech. The Roadrunner and Ben and Jerry come to mind for a start. That would really restrict what we watch on tele or the video games that we would play. Do we hate the police because they may physically defend us or protect us from criminals by inflicting harm to them?

    Fifth, he seeks immediate help from loving shepherds in the congregation. (Jas. 5:14-16)

    Is this a step to follow every time he has been abusive by raising his voice or looking at any porn? As for seeking their help immediately, isn't that an overexageration? Aren't there more urgent issues like seeing to the wife, whether she needs assistance, medical help, or other support?

    Sixth, he develops a plan that will help him to avoid all such behavior in the future.

    As a final step, he is told that he should develop a plan to help himself avoid abuse. What on earth did he talk to the Shepherds for? This step shows a complete lack of understanding of how a marriage works. As raymond frantz points out, there are no discussions with his wife and no way of understanding of how the dynamics work in their relationship in order to solve issues.

    Another problem is that a Brother can choose to go to the Elders with or without his wife but a wife must have her husband there if she goes to the Elders. It's unlikely to result in any real marriage counselling and even more so because they are not qualified counsellors.

  • raymond frantz
    raymond frantz

    I personally find quite lazy intellectually for the watchtower to be pointing the finger at the husband only especially in 2024 when we know that pendulum has swang towards women's rights especially within the marriage

  • Listener
    Listener

    I find it repulsive that they are doing this as a study article with toddlers and children present.

  • I quit!
    I quit!

    Apparently, there is a problem with a lot of JW men abusing their wives both physically and verbally or why the article? Why aren't they telling the abused women to consider getting the F out of the abusive relationship? To me it looks like the same old crap where the main goal is to keep the public image of the organization squeaky clean at the expense of the individual. They tell the "brother" he should stop beating on his wife, but it doesn't look to me like they bother to tell the wife how to stop being beat on or how to stop being verbally abused.

  • NotFormer
    NotFormer

    "Apparently, there is a problem with a lot of JW men abusing their wives both physically and verbally or why the article?"

    I learned many years ago that when a WT article says "True Christians don't", it really means "A lot of JWs are".

  • blondie
    blondie

    I agree Not Former. Since this info is in a study article, the WTS seems it is so known within the organization it is harder to hide it now WTS did the same with child sexual abuse, finally had to say something about but making sure they said the WTS was not the problem was with the pedophile jws, not the WTS. My experience with such cases is that women are told to stay with the abusive husband, perhaps their meekness will encourage the husband to change. and tell the husband to leave his wife, men have to stick together you know. Without the elders knowledge, I contacted the people I know in the law enforcement area about 2 cases I was aware of but said the wife would probably deny it. Ring a bell! WTS tactic with child abuse, tell parents not to say anything to authorities, or the parents might be punished.

  • AtLeastImNot
    AtLeastImNot

    Back in the day, when there was a study article focused on husbandly obligations, there was a subsequent article about wifely duties. I remember that very distinctly because on one occasion the brother said, “don’t think you sisters are getting off the hook. Next week will be studying…”

    They have to justify the whole headship thing. but It’s an outdated concept. I have never put much stock in anything the Apostle Paul said. those were his thoughts and they are indicative of the time during which she lived. However, if the WTS is going to insist on headship, well, then the men damn well better be responsible for something.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit