by Doug Mason 6 Replies latest watchtower bible
I plan to develop a Study on "The Second Temple Period", the first 600 years of Judaism (520 BCE to 70 CE). That's my hope, anyway.
I have listed potential resources, and I would like to know of other sources that could possibly be useful.
My list is at:
http://www.jwstudies.com/References_for__Second_Temple_Judaism_.pdf
Doug
I wish you well with this project Doug, I am sure you will illuminate for us what is to me at least a fairly obscure area of theological development.
Your reading list is long enough I would have thought ! if I do come across anything relevant I will let you know.
Phizzy,
Thank you.
Doug
That would be the first temple period for Solomon’s temple either didn’t exist or was in Tanis so no temple in Jerusalem.
Phizzy,
I had a few reasons for providing that list of sources:
1. I wanted to let you know what I had gathered.
2. This could take me quite a while to complete. I know that at the outset of writing any Study, I underestimate the time it will take -- and we appear to be heading for a long, hot, dry Summer
3. Who knows, at the age of 78, I might not complete it.
This "Second temple" period is crucial. At its ending, there was any number of Messianic claimants, while apocalyptic and eschatological fervour was high. Paul, part of the Jewish Diaspora, took on one of these Messiahs, spent years in solitude in the desert creating his thoughts, which he ultimately promoted. But his was not the only voice. His Messiah was not the only one.
Understanding the environment, particularly from the 3rd century BCE onward (including these latter writings such as 1 Enoch, Jubilees, Sirach, Daniel, DSS, etc.) is essential.
The Gospels were not literal documentaries. They were written in the wake of the Temple's destruction, some 40 years to 60+ years after Jesus "walked and talked, but did not write".
This is what we need to bring back to life.
Doug
I wish you well Doug, I am eager to see the completed project, even if it takes a long time, if I too am able of course, I am not far behind you in years !
Marked
