It's ridiculous that the Supreme Court even has to look at this case

by crownboy 2 Replies latest jw friends

  • crownboy
    crownboy

    Well, today the Supreme Court listened to oral arguments in a case titled Lawrence v. Texas . The Supreme Court will decide whether a Texas anti- sodomy law specifically targeting homosexuals is constitutional or not. I was just suprised that this is even still an issue today. You can read about it:

    http://slate.msn.com/id/2080746/

    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=558&ncid=701&e=1&u=/ap/20030327/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_sodomy

    In the first article, I found it interesting that the lawyer who represents the state of Texas thought that it was OK for only heterosexuals to engage in oral and/or anal sex because it "encourages procreation". If the quality of arguments are an indication, this law should be overturned.

  • reubenfine
    reubenfine

    Nice title; The Supreme Court Tries Sodomy

  • Bendrr
    Bendrr
    "....OK for only heterosexuals to engage in oral and/or anal sex because it "encourages procreation".

    I didn't know a woman could get pregnant that way! Damn! Now I'm a little worried....

    Mike.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit