i have a number of things to say about this wacky 45min school session.
why is it that it is inappropriate for the conductor to ever simply say that an answer is 'wrong'? invariably, he must ask for 'another answer,' particularly amusing during the true & false when there is only one other answer. shouldnt we be helped to reason on why someone might incorrectly come to this conclusion but why, in fact, this other conclusion is the 'correct' one? that brings me to my second point.
why is the answer and the reasoning behind it never discussed beyond reading the printed answer in the answer sheet, itself simply a quote from the source material? wouldnt it be beneficial to exercise the mind a bit and see if we can remember not simply what the 'correct' answer is, but why?
why are the fill in the blank questions so incredibly vague?? they tend to follow the style of 'Christians should be ____ and ____ and never ____ in matters of dress and grooming' - these questions completely destroy any pretense of a test of reasoning--not even reasoning but even of a test of knowledge or memory. what are you testing here?? you are testing the ability to look up the source material and find the sentence that matches the grammar and locate the missing words - thats a WORDSEARCH! a KIDS GAME!! the message is there is no need to reason on a question or think about it. doing so could yield several different 'correct' answers, all of which will elicit a 'could i have aNOTHER answer?' from the conductor. no, you need but look in the WT source material and copy out the correct answer, THAT is the true test of good JW.
maybe some conductors do this review better than others but this applies to most i have seen.
mox
ps, some of these questions are so vague, you can entertain yourself putting other possible words in them. one i rememer was 'brothers should not ______ on the platform' - go wild with that :)