THE LONG ANTICIPATED INTERVIEW OF THE 2 NEW GB MEMBERS

by raymond frantz 6 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • raymond frantz
    raymond frantz

    https://youtu.be/DxYJuPnKlgI?si=2ux5WoKg57Xdpaob

    Here we have the more indepth interview of the two new gb members Jody Jodele & Jacob Rumph and what jumps out to me is how borring they are, interestingly they don't go into detail when it dawned on them when they became anointed but they only go though their history and how they ended up in Bethel. As we already know Jody Jodele is the real estate expert that will help the gb capitalise on all this real estate money and Jacob Rumph sounds he spend alot of time as a missionary in South America, maybe he will provide a more insightful understanding of that continent to the gb since no indigenous jw will be part of the gb anytime soon.Now what strikes to me as odd is the examples they both sited as the Bible characters they want to relate more with, and no it is not Jesus.

    These modern-day Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses seems to be leaning heavily on Old Testament figures like Moses and Gideon as their role models instead of focusing on Jesus, which speaks volumes about the kind of organization they’re leading. This is a big deal—it's almost like they've turned back the clock to align themselves with the Pharisees, who famously clung to Moses as their guide rather than embracing the teachings of Jesus.

    When you look at the early Christian apostles like Paul and Peter, they didn’t tell followers to imitate Moses or Gideon. Instead, they urged everyone to follow Jesus’ example. Paul even said, “Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ.” The entire point of early Christianity was to move beyond the legalistic, rule-based approach of the Old Covenant and to embrace the freedom and grace that Jesus brought.

    But here we are, with the Governing Body in 2024 pointing to Old Testament figures as examples, just like the Pharisees did. The Pharisees stuck to the letter of the law, citing Moses as their father, which kept them in a rigid, rules-focused mindset. The Governing Body’s choice to align themselves with Old Testament leaders like Moses and Gideon rather than with Jesus and his apostles feels like a step backward. It’s almost as if they’re more interested in enforcing strict rules and hierarchy than in fostering the compassionate, grace-filled approach that Jesus taught.

    So, what does this say about the organization? It suggests that they’re more concerned with authority, control, and sticking to their own “laws” than with following the example of Jesus, who prioritized love, humility, and personal faith. When you think about it, choosing Moses over Jesus as a role model really does reveal where their priorities lie.

  • dropoffyourkeylee
    dropoffyourkeylee

    The succession planning of the WT is the weakest of any organization I have ever seen.

  • Journeyman
    Journeyman

    So both are essentially "company men" - they've had no significant life outside the JW bubble, and Jelene went straight to Bethel at 19 and has been in and out of it since, so he's barely even had any life outside of the corporate environment of WTHQ. At least Rumph, as a missionary in different parts of the world, will have seen something of life outside.

    It's no surprise then that they aspired to joining the GB as they have no other perspective, unlike many past GB members (and also past travelling overseers, branch workers and so on) some of whom were once even members of other churches.

    Interesting point about the increasing emphasis on "Old Testament" judges and prophets in JW material lately, rather than focusing more on Jesus. It's true that we don't see much mention of the "OT" in the "NT", which does seem to indicate we shouldn't focus so much on the pre-Christian era.

  • blondie
    blondie

    The WTS wants "loyalists" who have proven it over time, and not necessarily "anointed" from their baptism. "replacement anointed" something that made Fred Franz furious. Puppets.

  • blondie
    blondie

    And then there are "replacements" of anointed fallen away (1935 was the cutoff date, no more anointed after that, then this when those after 1935 started partaking, and the the steading increase of those partaking on the memorial which starting about 2008, about 20,000 today)

    W2008 1/15 p. 23

    It seems, however, that not all who have been called to a heavenly hope since the 1930’s are replacements for ones who have fallen away. Jehovah has evidently made sure that we will have anointed Christians among us all through the final days of this system of things until the destruction of “Babylon the Great.”

    WT1998 2/15 p.21

    Suppose an anointed one became unfaithful. Would there be a replacement? Paul indicated as much in his discussion of the symbolic olive tree. (Romans 11:11-32) If a spirit-begotten one needs to be replaced, likely God would give the heavenly calling to someone whose faith had been exemplary in rendering sacred service to him for many years

    WT1992 3/1 p. 20-21

    What if some anointed ones fail to be integrity keepers? At this late hour, the number of such disloyal ones will no doubt be few. Reasonably, any replacement would come, not from among newly baptized ones, but from among those who have stuck with Jesus in his trials through many years of faithful service.

    https://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/statistics.php#L4

  • gavindlt
    gavindlt

    I must say I have a lot of tolerance for many things but the thought of even looking at this update nauseated me. I could not do it!

  • DesirousOfChange

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit