Miracle Wheat: Was Russell really guilt-free regarding it? Did Rutherford have more to do with it than Russell?

by ILoveTTATT2 5 Replies latest jw friends

  • ILoveTTATT2
    ILoveTTATT2
    Jim Penton, in his book Apocalypse Delayed, barely touches on the Miracle Wheat episode. In a 300+ page book, this is what he says about it:

    "He was charged with financial chicanery, particularly in what came to be known as the Miracle Wheat episode. ... Both the Miracle Wheat and Ross cases deserve some comment. In 1904 a man by the name of Stoner,who knew nothing about Russell or the Bible Students, discovered in Fincastle,Virginia, an amazingly productive variety of wheat which he named “MiracleWheat.” Seven years later two Bible Students donated thirty bushels of it to the Watch Tower Society to be sold at a dollar per pound as seed grain. The proceeds – some $ 1,800 – were to be used by the society to carry on its activities.Russell gained nothing personally from the proceeds, but his enemies claimed that the sale was a religious fraud. A New York newspaper, the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, attacked him and lampooned both Russell and Miracle Wheat in a cartoon. Russell sued the Eagle but lost. He was evidently quite sincere in selling the famous grain but was more positive about its qualities than he should have been. Miracle Wheat was apparently no more than a mutant strain, a “sport.” It soon lost its outstanding vitality and was not, as he believed, a sign that the earth was soon to be restored to paradisiacal conditions."[i]



    [i] Penton, M. James(2015-02-20). Apocalypse Delayed: The Story of Jehovah's Witnesses, ThirdEdition (Kindle Locations 1572-1580). University of Toronto Press, ScholarlyPublishing Division. Kindle Edition.

    According to Penton, Russell was quite sincere in selling the wheat. From what he wrote in the Watchtower, that is the impression that one gets.

    But from a document that has only been analyzed by pro-Russellites, and in an obscure website, one gets a whole different viewpoint of Russell.

    Here's what the Bible Students Monthly, a "newspaper" dedicated to promoting the Watchtower and delivered throughout Brooklyn, said about it:

    BSM Vol. 3 No.11

    PASTOR RUSSELL INTERVIEWED

    A Representative Called on Pastor Russellfor Some Facts Respecting “Miracle Wheat” and Other Matters. – He States WhySome Ministers Oppose Him. – “The Eagle” the Channel.

    WE REPORT the interview, as follows:

    "Pastor Russell, the Brooklyn Eaglehas attacked you in connection with 'Miracle Wheat.' It has given the inferencethat you are a wheat speculator and gulling the farmers by selling ordinarywheat for $1.00 a pound. Your neighbors and the public would be interested inhearing your explanation of the matter."

    "I have nothing to do with 'MiracleWheat.' I am not in the wheat business in any sense or degree. The Eagle ismerely following out its nagging and slandering policy which it has toward mesince my coming to Brooklyn. Slander, misrepresentation, and vilification seemto be the policy of The Eagle for some years-a very different policy, Iunderstand, from the one which gave it its reputation originally. My friendstell me that its course toward me is much the same that it pursued toward Dr.Talmage. Indeed, one Baptist minister remarked, 'The filthy Eagle killed Dr.Talmage-literally. He died of a broken heart.' I know nothing about that, but Ido know that The Eagle has not killed me and I do not propose to let it."

    "But, Pastor Russell, was there notsome wheat sold at the Tabernacle and was it not called 'Miracle Wheat?'

    "Contrary to our wishes, a reporter ofThe Eagle purchased one pound of 'Miracle Wheat' at the Tabernacle. He boughtit from Mr. Bohnet's representative, who obtained the privilege of using abasement room at the Tabernacle for preparing the wheat to be sent out by mailin pound packages.

    Mr. Bohnet had promised that the proceedsof his wheat would be donated to our Free Tract Fund for sending out the BibleMessage in all languages. Mr. Bohnet has an interest in a farm in Pennsylvaniaon which he grew this 'Miracle Wheat.'

    "Where Mr. Bohnet got his seed willinterest you. Three years ago the newspapers contained extensive accounts ofthis 'Miracle Wheat' which was found in Virginia by a man named Stoner, whogave it its name. He claimed that he found it in answer to prayer. Thenewspapers quoted the U. S. Agricultural Department's Report made by AssistantSecretary Miller. The report declared that the 'Miracle Wheat' yielded betweentwo and three times as much crop to the acre as other wheat and that itrequires only about one-fourth as much of it for seed. I copied the newspaperaccounts in my Journal, The Watch Tower. Subsequently Mr. Stoner's agent calledat my study and showed me samples of the 'Miracle Wheat,' one with as many asone hundred and twenty stalks from one seed, and told me that most of hisorders for the wheat had come from my free notices.

    "I gave the item as news and asevidence of the fact that we are entering the New Dispensation in which God haspromised to bless the fields and to increase their productiveness. I recognizedat once what a value such wheat would have to all mankind. If it would merelydouble the crop it would mean an increase of five hundred million dollars inthe value of the wheat crop of our country and give us cheaper bread. If itwould increase the crop still more, returns would be still larger.

    "About then my friend, Mr. Bohnet,came to my study and collected a few grains of the wheat which was shown to meby Mr. Stoner's agent. Mr. Bohnet planted those grains and this year wrote methat he had a sufficiency to sell; that he would dispose of it at $1.00 perpound and give the proceeds to our Free Tract Fund. Does it seem strange to youthat The Eagle holds up my friend as a criminal because of his desire tobenefit the farmers of the world and his further desire to turn the proceeds ofhis wheat into free tracts? Yes, that would seem strange. But that is not whatThe Eagle attempted to do. It merely wished to slander me-to kill me, byinferring, insinuating, hinting, caricaturing, etc."

    "But is not a dollar a pound a newprice for wheat?"

    "I had nothing whatever to do with theprice of the wheat. That was the concern of Mr. Bohnet and those who sent himtheir mail orders. I know nothing about wheat nor about farming. I have heardof forty or fifty cents per pound being paid for seed wheat of especiallyproductive strains, but I never before heard of wheat which would produce twohundred kernels from one, as many testify of the 'Miracle Wheat.' If I were afarmer I would pay, if necessary, not only one dollar per pound, but even tendollars per ounce, in order to get a start in wheat of this character."
    So this must be analyzed point-by-point.

    "He bought it from Mr. Bohnet's representative, who obtained the privilege of using a basement room at the Tabernacle for preparing the wheat to be sent out by mail in pound packages."

    So apparently according to Russell it is a privilege to be able to use Watchtower property to sell fraudulent goods.

    "Mr. Bohnet had promised that the proceeds of his wheat would be donated to our Free Tract Fund for sending out the Bible Message in all languages. ... I recognized at once what a value such wheat would have to all mankind. ... [it] would give us cheaper bread. ... Does it seem strange to you that The Eagle holds up my friend as a criminal because of his desire to benefit the farmers of the world and his further desire to turn the proceeds of his wheat into free tracts?"

    So he got upset because the Eagle recognized that he was selling something that would (if it had really been a "miraculous" wheat) benefit mankind at an outrageous price so that it would be turned into something that would damage mankind? It's like Martin Shkreli getting upset because he jacked up the price of a life-saving drug... oh yeah... he did. He's now the poster child for pharma company greed. If he really wanted to benefit mankind, then why wasn't he making as much as he could of this wheat and giving it for free or at a low cost?

    "Three years ago the newspapers contained extensive accounts of this 'Miracle Wheat' which was found in Virginia by a man named Stoner, who gave it its name. He claimed that he found it in answer to prayer. The newspapers quoted the U. S. Agricultural Department's Report made by Assistant Secretary Miller. The report declared that the 'Miracle Wheat' yielded between two and three times as much crop to the acre as other wheat and that it requires only about one-fourth as much of it for seed. I copied the newspaper accounts in my Journal, The Watch Tower. Subsequently Mr. Stoner's agent called at my study and showed me samples of the 'Miracle Wheat,' one with as many as one hundred and twenty stalks from one seed, and told me that most of his orders for the wheat had come from my free notices."

    Now we know that all of the newspapers in 1908 were sent a fraudulent, misquoted report that supposedly came from H.A. Miller, from the USDA. Russell copied the newspaper accounts, didn't contact the USDA, and that made more business for a con man. Then, gullible Russell was shown the "miracle" wheat, probably was lied to, and believed the agent 100%. This is the most important take-away. If Russell was "divinely guided," then he would have known this was a fraud.

    "I am not in the wheat business in any sense or degree. ... I recognized at once what a value such wheat would have to all mankind. If it would merely double the crop it would mean an increase of five hundred million dollars in the value of the wheat crop of our country and give us cheaper bread. If it would increase the crop still more, returns would be still larger.... But is not a dollar a pound a new price for wheat? ... I have heard of forty or fifty cents per pound being paid for seed wheat of especially productive strains, but I never before heard of wheat which would produce two hundred kernels from one, as many testify of the 'Miracle Wheat.'"

    Contradiction much? For someone not in the wheat business, he sure knew pricing, value, and production of wheat!

    And my favorite quote from this:


    "If I were a farmer I would pay, if necessary, not only one dollar per pound, but even ten dollars per ounce, in order to get a start in wheat of this character."

    Rephrased: "This is a get-rich-quick scheme, and I know that the first one who gets into this will make a lot of money. I think that this business is so good that I would pay up to 9600 times the value of ordinary wheat to be the first to get in."

    So overall, this paints a pretty bad picture of Russell. But was it Russell who wrote this article?

    Why am I suspicious?

    Brooklyn Eagle, November 12, 1911:

    "This borough has been literally strewn with a certain copy of the Brooklyn Tabernacle People's Pulpit ... I am quite sure, also, that "Pastor Russell Interviewed" was never written by the "pastor" for he was on the sea, I am given to understand, when it was dictated."

    (In case you're wondering, I checked. There was barely any radio on boats in 1911. Definitely no phones).

    This and other details makes me think that Russell wasn't too invested in the Miracle Wheat, but that Rutherford was. He probably saw the power and the money that could be had by having many "minions" working for you. It was HE that was most upset at the Brooklyn Eagle, and he was the one who was instrumental to get Russell to sue the Eagle. But it is only a suspicion in my part. I don't know of a way to prove this.

  • Listener
    Listener
    Great work ILoveTtatt. You've put a lot of research into this but what I love most is how you have brought the story to life and just as an historian attempts to do, you have tried to put it into the context of people living at that time. Are you making a Blog?
  • ILoveTTATT2
    ILoveTTATT2

    Hi Listener,

    I believe that the full article will be on jwfacts as a "side PDF" to be downloaded.

    Thanks for reading and liking it!

  • ILoveTTATT2
    ILoveTTATT2
    One thing that I thought was interesting was that when RUSSELL was promoting wheat that HE thought was amazing, this is what he said about it:

    "The 'Miracle Wheat' yielded between two and three times as much crop to the acre as other wheat and that it requires only about one-fourth as much of it for seed."

    "I gave the item as news and as evidence of the fact that we are entering the New Dispensation in which God has promised to bless the fields and to increase their productiveness. I recognized at once what a value such wheat would have to all mankind. If it would merely double the crop it would mean an increase of five hundred million dollars in the value of the wheat crop of our country and give us cheaper bread. If it would increase the crop still more, returns would be still larger."

    So HIS "miracle wheat" was evidence of God's blessing on the fields, a GOOD thing.

    The "miracle wheat" turned out to be not so miraculous.

    About 50 years later, Norman Borlaug, a man who increased the WORLD'S wheat production to about double, or in some cases up to quadruple what it had been, was DISSED and his work MINIMIZED by the Watchtower!

    Why? Because it was close to 1975, and the Watchtower NEEDED to paint the world's situation as DOOM AND GLOOM, no matter what!

    *** g72 7/22 p. 3 What Is the “Green Revolution”? ***
    "...dire predictions of world famine came from many sources. Some authorities estimated that the mid-1970’s would certainly see that famine. There were those who even said that the world famine had already begun....

    The “green revolution” more specifically has to do with the successful development of very high-yielding types of wheat and rice. It is so important because these two grains, especially rice, are the staple foods for most of earth’s population.


    The first breakthrough came as the result of efforts by a team of agriculture experts headed by Dr. Norman E. Borlaug. This was after about twenty years of experimenting. They developed varieties of wheat that produced up to four bushels where only one bushel had grown before!
    The new wheat was short, and its stalk very stiff. This was important, as it enabled the plant to avoid falling down under the weight of the extra-large heads of grain. Also, it was not sensitive to the length of the daytime period. This meant that it could be planted even in those parts of the earth where the daylight hours differed from where the seed was developed. Also, it had a very high response to fertilization and irrigation.


    How Effective Has It Been?

    A Warning
    Yet, many agriculture experts warn against such a conclusion. They say that the “green revolution” is not solving mankind’s hunger problems now, and will not do so in the future!"

    Yeah... Watchtower will spin ANYTHING to fit whatever it wants to say!

    Fake "miracle" wheat brought about by a fraud? Evidence of God's blessing on mankind!

    Real miracle wheat brought about by the combined work of thousands of people and decades of research? Yeah that's got issues, and it won't solve the impending armageddon of 1975!
  • MarkofCane
    MarkofCane

    It's interesting for sure, I'm certain snake oil has properties you could spin in a positive fashion to fit an agenda as well.

    Russell saw an opportunity to make money and as a business man tried to capitalize on this venture, once he felt the repercussions of his folly he tried to distance himself from it and lay the blame on others. I believe they still have the same policy in place.

  • ILoveTTATT2
    ILoveTTATT2

    Here is the second part of that Bible Students Monthly which dealt with the Miracle Wheat. This is obviously Rutherford's style of writing. I placed in bold only a few things that caught my eye:

    "The articles published by it relative to "miracle" wheat and Pastor Russell's alleged connection therewith, have been so false and libelous that Pastor Russell, on the advice of his attorneys, has sued "The Eagle" for libel claiming $100,000 damages."

    This shows that Rutherford was heavily involved in this. Russell sued for libel, meaning that that what was claimed needed to be shown to be FALSE in order for the case to be won. If Rutherford didn't know that there was that condition in order to win a libel case in the US, then he was a either a really bad lawyer, or he was delusional. Probably both.

    "Pastor Russell,' and is recognized and addressed by such title, he being the leader, teacher and Pastor of thousands of Christian people who reside throughout said countries"

    Isn't Jesus supposed to be the leader of the congregation? The BSM explicitly said that Russell was the leader.

    "plaintiff has borne a high reputation for honesty, integrity, fair-dealing and truthfulness, and of being an honest and fearless preacher of the Gospel of truth"

    Right... Russell was NOT an honest man... and neither was Rutherford.


    "Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, a religious corporation, and President of the Peoples Pulpit Association, also a religious corporation, both of which said corporations are engaged"

    Granted, "religious corporations" are non-profit, but... the Watch Tower is truly a "business corporation" disguised as a religion.

    "six million volumes of which have been sold and placed in the hands of the people throughout the United States and foreign countries, which books are sold and distribbuted [sic] by the aforesaid religious corporations of which plaintiff is the President;"

    A religious corporation that sells books... sounds like a business to me!

    "that the good name, reputation and moral standing of plaintiff are absolutely essential to the proper and successful promulgation of the Gospel in the manner adopted and used by him as aforesaid;"

    That's the real reason for the suit. Rephrased: "Shut up! You're hurting the business!"

    "has received through the mails, insulting and insinuating letters and writings by reason thereof and has been seriously injured in his peace of mind and has been grievously disturbed and his feelings injured and has been held up to public ridicule and scorn, as a result of all of which plaintiff has suffered injury to his reputation, good name, fame and standing, all to his damage in the sum of one hundred thousand dollars.""

    Awww... poor baby! People are upset that you are selling a fraudulent product for exhorbitant prices, and that hurts your feelings. So much so, that you are suing for $2.5M in 2016 dollars. I guess Russell's feelings and reputation are that precious...



    Here is the complete article:

    BSM Vol. 3 No.11

    BROOKLYN EAGLE SUED FOR $100,000.00

    PASTOR RUSSELL APPEALS TO THE COURTS

    SEEKS REDRESS FOR ALLEGED CONTINUOUS LIBEL BY "THE EAGLE." - SEEKS TO DEFEND HIS HONORABLE NAME. - THE BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INSUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE VAST THRONG DESIROUS OF HEARING THE TABERNACLE PASTOR JUST PRIOR TO HIS SAILING FOR ENGLAND.

    SHORTLY AFTER PASTOR RUSSELL removed to Brooklyn, "The Brooklyn Daily Eagle," for some unknown reason and without excuse, manifested an antipathy toward him. From time to time it has published scurrilous articles against him, the virility of which has increased to such an extent that further forbearance with this paper "has ceased to be a virtue."

    At the request of "The Eagle's" representatives Pastor Russell, and those connected with him in his work, have on several occasions furnished "The Eagle" with information concerning the nature and character of said work, but the same has been either ignored or so garbled by "The Eagle" as to make him and his work appear ridiculous, tending to hold him up to public contempt. The articles published by it relative to "miracle" wheat and Pastor Russell's alleged connection therewith, have been so false and libelous that Pastor Russell, on the advice of his attorneys, has sued "The Eagle" for libel claiming $100,000 damages.

    THE COMPLAINT
    The complaint made by the plaintiff through his attorneys, after setting forth that the defendant is a domestic corporation and has a large general circulation in New York and elsewhere, further says:

    "SECOND: That at the time of the publication hereinafter mentioned plaintiff was and still is, a resident of said Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, and for more than thirty years last past, and at all the times herein-after mentioned, plaintiff has been and still is, engaged in preaching the Gospel to the people of the United States of America and Europe and elsewhere; that he is now and for some time past has been, the regularly elected Pastor of a large congregation of Christians at the Brooklyn Tabernacle, of the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, to whom he preaches at regular intervals and whom he serves as Pastor, having assistants who represent him in his absence; that he is also, and for some time has been, the regularly elected Pastor of a large congregation of Christian people at the London Tabernacle, of London, England, whom he serves as Pastor, and to whom he preaches at stated intervals, having assistants there to represent him during his absence from said congregation, and that he is and for several years past has been, popularly and favorably known throughout the United States of America and Europe and other countries as 'Pastor Russell,' and is recognized and addressed by such title, he being the leader, teacher and Pastor of thousands of Christian people who reside throughout said countries; that for many years past plaintiff has been and now is, the Editor of a Religious Journal, known as 'The Watch Tower,' which is published twice each month and circulated throughout the United States, Canada and European countries and is read by thousands of Christian people in said countries; that his sermons are published each week in a large number of newspapers throughout the United States, Canada, Great Britain and Australia, and have been so published for a long space of time, and as such minister of the Gospel, at the times hereinafter mentioned, and long prior thereto, plaintiff has borne a high reputation for honesty, integrity, fair-dealing and truthfulness, and of being an honest and fearless preacher of the Gospel of truth as set forth in the Holy Scriptures, and has always enjoyed the respect and confidence of the people in his own community and in the community at large, wherever his sermons have been heard or read; that he is and for many years past has been, the President of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, a religious corporation, and President of the Peoples Pulpit Association, also a religious corporation, both of which said corporations are engaged in spreading the Gospel and generally in religious and philanthropic work for the betterment of mankind, and which said religious corporations receive their support, both moral and financial, from Christian people living throughout the United States and Canada; that for some years past plaintiff has regularly written for periodicals and Magazines, religious articles dealing with Biblical questions which have been published throughout the United States; that plaintiff is the author of a certain series of religious works or books, published in six volumes, and which are known as "Studies in the Scriptures," a large quantity, to wit: six million volumes of which have been sold and placed in the hands of the people throughout the United States and foreign countries, which books are sold and distribbuted [sic] by the aforesaid religious corporations of which plaintiff is the President; that the good name, reputation and moral standing of plaintiff are absolutely essential to the proper and successful promulgation of the Gospel in the manner adopted and used by him as aforesaid; that all of his publications, compositions and writings aforesaid have been devoted exclusively to religious questions and doctrines; that during the period of time herein mentioned he has given, and is now giving, all of his time, energy, influence and strength to the preaching of the Gospel, both orally and by the printed page, etc.

    "THIRD: That on, prior and subsequent to the 23rd day of September, 1911. the defendant at divers [sic] times, published in its said newspaper, 'The Brooklyn Daily Eagle,' cerain [sic] articles concerning the sale of a certain seed wheat, and that the plaintiff was directly interested in the sale of 'Miracle Wheat' and derived a personal advantage therefrom.

    "FOURTH: That prior and subsequent to the 23rd day of September, 1911, the defendant at divers times published in its said newspaper, 'The Brooklyn Daily Eagle,' certain articles and cartoons or pictures concerning the conduct, management and existing conditions of a certain Bank in said City of New York known as the Union Bank, in which said articles it was charged or intimated that the directors, officers, managers or persons in some way connected with said Union Bank had violated their obligations to the depositors and patrons of said Bank and that said directors, officers, managers or persons in some way connected therewith, were guilty of a violation of the laws of the State of New York (in that they had defrauded the depositors and patrons of said Union Bank) and were criminally liable to prosecution for such misconduct, and that an investigation in-to the affairs of said Bank was being conducted, and that the District' Attorney of the County of Kings would present and had presented the facts concerning said Union Bank to the Grand Jury of Kings County, and that it was rumored that said Grand Jury had returned five indictments in connection with the affairs of said Bank for some criminal offense connected with the management of said Bank, and its affairs had become so malodorous that the defendant, in its said newspaper, named and designated said Union Bank as the 'Onion Bank.'

    "FIFTH: That on the 23rd day of September, 1911, and in the same issue of its said newspaper which contained an article concerning the official' investigation into the affairs of said Union Bank, aforesaid, the defendant, contriving and fraudulently intending to injure the plaintiff in his good name, fame and reputation, maliciously composed, printed, published and circulated of and concerning the plaintiff, a certain picture, drawing, photograph or cartoon, with inscriptions thereon, together with a certain article and words in connection therewith, in its said newspaper, 'The Brooklyn Daily Eagle,' so published and circulated throughout the Borough of Brooklyn, City and State of New York, and other places throughout the world.”

    Then follows a copy of the Cartoon and publication.

    "SIXTH: That the building shown in the picture, photograph, drawing or cartoon, aforesaid, is intended to represent and does represent the said Union Bank Building, and the words across the top of the door, to wit—'Onion Bank,' represent and were intended by defendant to represent said Union Bank; that the figure of the man standing in the door of said building, as represented and shown upon said picture, photograph, drawing or cartoon, represents and was intended by defendant to represent, some director or officer or person connected with said Union Bank calling out to an old man who appears In the street, as shown by said cartoon or picture; that the figure of said old man, as shown on said picture, photograph, drawing or cartoon, and which appears therefrom to be in the street in close proximity to said Union Bank, represents and was intended by defendant to represent the plaintiff herein, who, in said picture, photograph, drawing, cartoon or caricature, is represented as going through the streets carrying in his hand a package of 'Miracle Wheat,' and as a 'street hawker' crying out his wares, or goods for sale; and the words, 'You're wasting your time, come on in here,' appearing on said picture, photograph, drawing or cartoon, represented and were intended by defendant to represent some officer of said Union Bank, or some person connected with said Bank (who was engaged in defrauding its depositors and patrons), calling to and inviting plaintiff to cease selling wheat and come on in the bank and join others in defrauding its depositors and patrons, that his, plaintiff's time could be much better employed in said Bank and greater returns could be realized by plaintiff in engaging with those in the Bank in 'fleecing,' cheating and defrauding its patrons and depositiors [sic]; that the words, 'Easy Money Puzzle,' appearing on said picture, photograph, drawing or cartoon, were Intended by defendant to represent and do represent that both plaintiff and said Union Bank directors and officers were engaged in an unrighteous and unlawful scheme or business, and that plaintiff by misrepresentations, fraud and deception was obtaining 'easy money' or dishonest Money or tainted money from the people; that in connection with said picture, photograph, drawing or cartoon appear the following printed article or words: 'If Pastor Russell (meaning plaintiff) can get' a dollar ,a pound for 'Miracle Wheat,' what could he (meaning plaintiff) have got for Miracle stocks and bonds as a director of the old Union Bank'; that by said entire drawing, caricature, cartoon, picture and print, and the words printed in connection therewith and as a part thereof, defendant meant and intended to show and charge, and did represent and charge, and it was so understood by those who saw it, that plaintiff as a Minister of the Gospel, as a Pastor of Religious congregations of Christian people, was selling said 'Miracle Wheat' and as a 'street hawker' was going about the streets selling the same at a large price, and was thereby defrauding the people and by the use of a fraudulent scheme, trick or misrepresentation plaintiff was wrongfully obtaining from the people, in an easy, slick, deceptive and fraudulent manner, large sums of money for his own personal gain, and that plaintiff, because of his cunning and ability to manipulate a dishonest scheme enabling him to sell wheat at one dollar per pound, was wasting his time in so selling wheat when he might associate himself with dishonest men and engage in the fraudulent sale of stocks and bonds and thereby reap a far greater amount of dishonest money, and that if he, plaintiff, as the Pastor of a congregation of Christian people could fraudulently induce people to pay one dollar per pound for Miracle Wheat, he would succeed much better in engaging himself with a number of criminals in inducing the people to buy fraudulent stocks and bonds.

    "SEVENTH: That the statements and representations made, and attempted to be made and conveyed by said picture, drawing, caricature, cartoon or print and by various inscriptions that appear thereon, and by said words, article or reading matter published in connection therewith and as a part thereof, as aforesaid, were and are wholly false and were printed, edited, composed and published by the defendant maliciously and with a wrongful intent of injuring the plaintiff in his good name, fame and reputation and in his professional career as a Minister of the Gospel.

    "EIGHTH: That by reason of the foregoing, the plaintiff has been brought into scandal and reproach and has been held up to odium, scandal, disgrace and contempt among his neighbors, friends and the readers of his Journal, books and other writings and among his parishoners [sic] and members of his congregations, as well as his business and professional reputation as President of the Religious Societies aforesaid, and has received through the mails, insulting and insinuating letters and writings by reason thereof and has been seriously injured in his peace of mind and has been grievously disturbed and his feelings injured and has been held up to public ridicule and scorn, as a result of all of which plaintiff has suffered injury to his reputation, good name, fame and standing, all to his damage in the sum of one hundred thousand dollars."

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit