Daily Legal News: 9th District partially reverses Jehovah’s Witnesses molestation suit - (Zalkin case. Decision mostly in Plaintiff's favor)

by AndersonsInfo 8 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • AndersonsInfo
    AndersonsInfo

    http://www.dlnnews.com/editorial/16315

    9th District partially reverses Jehovah’s Witnesses molestation suit

    TRACEY BLAIR
    Legal News Reporter


    Published: September 20, 2016

    A Lorain County trial court erred when it ordered the West Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses to produce certain documents for discovery in a child molestation case.

    However, the trial court was correct in concluding the majority of documents that were compelled are not protected from disclosure via the clergy-penitent privilege or the First Amendment, according to a recent decision by the 9th District Court of Appeals.

    Former West Congregation member Elizabeth McFarland sued the Lorain-based church in 2013 for negligence, ratification and fraud by omission/concealment.

    According to case summary, McFarland was a member of West Congregation from 1997 to 2001, when she was 10 to 14 years old. McFarland’s parents told church elders that Scott Silvasy, a fellow member, had molested their daughter for several years.

    Silvasy died in 2003. McFarland claimed elders never disciplined him or reported the issue to their superiors, and discouraged her parents from doing so.

    In her suit, McFarland said church elders were aware Silvasy had previously molested a minor and was a danger to her. She sought compensatory and punitive damages.

    After discovery began, McFarland served Watchtower – which was responsible for disseminating literature to the Bodies of Elders at each local congregation – to produce certain documents, including:

    • A 1997 letter from Watchtower asking local elders to report any current or former members in a Society-appointed position with a known history of child molestation.

    Watchtower argued that Silvasy never served in a “Society-appointed position.” The trial court found McFarland’s request was overbroad, but that any reports that specifically mentioned Silvasy were relevant.

    • Any documents the West Congregation had relating to Silvasy and herself.

    The appellants cited clergy-penitent privilege, attorney-client privilege and the First Amendment.

    • All letters that Watchtower/Christian Congregation sent to the Bodies of Elders between Jan. 1, 1980 and Dec. 31, 2002.

    The court ordered appellants to produce 10 letters from the Service Department elders to the Bodies of Elders, plus 15 other letters and memos.

    Church officials filed an appeal over 19 of the documents they were ordered to produce.

    READ MORE: http://www.dlnnews.com/editorial/16315

    Also: Link to original newspaper article back in 2013 when lawsuit was filed:

    http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-news/oh-lorain/woman-accuses-member-of-west-congregation-of-jehovahs-witnesses-in-lorain-of-sexual-abuse

    And link to pdf of court decision dated August 22, 2016:

    http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/9/2016/2016-Ohio-5462.pdf

    STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN )
    ELIZABETH MCFARLAND
    Appellee
    v.
    WEST CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, LORAIN, OH, INC., et al.
    Appellants
    C.A. No. 15CA010740
    APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LORAIN, OHIO CASE No. 13CV181057
    DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
    Dated: August 22, 2016


  • Saename
    Saename

    As expected, they're still not cooperating. They're still filling appeals...

  • pepperheart
    pepperheart

    they are filing appeals OH GOOD in one court case in the uk these past weeks they were fined £250,000 by the court they appealed and finished up with a £1 million pound fine for court costs LOL

  • joe134cd
    joe134cd

    The cracks are getting bigger.

  • zeb
    zeb

    what is happening with the inquiry in the UK please.

  • stuckinarut2
    stuckinarut2

    Again they just seem obstructive by not complying!

    This is about children's safety GB!

    If the society wants to give a "good witness", surely the wisest thing to do is to comply and be cooperative with such enquiries! By being argumentative and non compliant, they just come off looking guilty and heartless!

  • sir82
    sir82

    Eventually, they're going to get hit with a monster case and lose their figurative shirt.

    They can't keep dancing around and getying lucky forever - just with the sheer number of cases against them.

  • JHK
    JHK

    Judicial appeal means more pain for the victim.

    Governing Body Bank and his god... the money.

  • Mephis
    Mephis

    So the WBTS believe that every letter sent to and from the service desk, regardless of content, is protected by privilege, Judge Whitmore's judgement there has already demolished that comprehensively. She's taken the view that WBTS can do that if someone requests and then receives spiritual guidance, but just quoting a few scriptures in a letter and claiming everyone on the service desk is an attorney really, really doesn't meet that requirement.

    Hope the survivor is eventually able to hold them to account for knowing that the man who abused her was a pedophile.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit