UK The Times: "We need to do more to tackle sexual abuse among JWs"

by darkspilver 9 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • darkspilver
    darkspilver

    Article written by Kathleen Hallisey appearing on the website of the UK's Times Newspaper - the article does not appear (yet?) to be in the print version.

    Kathleen Hallisey is a senior solicitor at Bolt Burdon Kemp, specialising in child abuse. She acted on behalf of the claimant in the landmark case of A v Watchtower [2015] EWHC 1722 (QB), the first judgment against the Jehovah’s Witnesses in the UK for historical sexual abuse.

    In the article she refers to the WT UK Child Safeguarding Policy - click here for a side-by-side 2012/2017 comparision of the document

    She also refers to the UK BBC TV 2002 Panorama documentary: "Suffer the little children" - see bottom of this post to watch.

    I believe the 'landmark case' on which she acted on behalf of the claimant is this one, when she was working for AO Advocates

    BBC: Jehovah's Witnesses to compensate woman over sex abuse - 19 June
    A woman who claimed Jehovah's Witness elders failed to protect her from sex abuse carried out by a paedophile has won a £275,000 payout.
    The woman, now in her 20s, alleges she was abused as a child in Loughborough by ministerial servant Peter Stewart.
    She had argued at London's High Court that he used his role to abuse her.
    A judge ruled the organisation was liable for the abuse because it failed to take "safeguarding steps" after Stewart admitted abusing another child.
    Mr Justice Globe said he was "satisfied" the defendants should be "held responsible" for the abuse, which took place between 1989 and 1994.
    It is the first civil case in the UK of historical sexual abuse brought against the Christian-based religious movement.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33201010

    http://www.boltburdonkemp.co.uk/child-abuse/church/

    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-need-to-do-more-to-tackle-sexual-abuse-among-jehovahs-witnesses-b26nmjn90

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep4h2lKWRlg

  • Heaven
    Heaven

    The entire JW foundation based on Patriarchy where there are weak criminal sanctions for pedophiles, repressive ideals about sex, inequality for women, and social powerlessness of children, to name a few, needs to be abolished for a real, positive outcome to occur in tackling the sexual abuse problem. This is fundamentally how the JW religion is defined. I find it hard to believe the kind of change needed will ever happen.


  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    A well written and well informed Article, I hope it does appear in print !

  • The Searcher
    The Searcher

    "A disfellowshipped person is shunned entirely, including by immediate family members, even if living in the same household."

    Can't say I've heard of this scenario - yet. Maybe others here will have.

  • Half banana
    Half banana

    @ The Searcher, it's not usual but by no means unlikely that super zealots with shun d/f people in the same house. My JW wife shunned me because I had left the org. She stopped talking with me-- it was very inconvenient dealing with the children.

    @ Darkspilver Unfortunately most JWs don’t read The Times. Nevertheless when the same information filters through to all media forms, it will become clear that all is not well in Watchtowerland.

    This negative publicity should discourage new converts and be the last straw for many captive doubters in the ranks.

    As you say Heaven it is unlikely that the GB will change because their power comes from their smug delusion that they are the only ones who are divinely inspired. They imagine that doing God’s will involves being known as the people who quote the Bible and champion literal applications of it, as with the “two witnesses” rule.

    Here’s the rub: to capitulate to secular law over the child abuse issue would expose a glaring inadequacy of Biblical wisdom... and Biblical wisdom is the premise for their existence.

    I think the JW org can only lose out.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot
    Half banana - "...Here’s the rub: to capitulate to secular law over the child abuse issue would expose a glaring inadequacy of Biblical wisdom... and Biblical wisdom is the premise for their existence."

    Nicely summarized.

    Even if they wanted to... from their POV, they can't.

    And in fact, will feel compelled to resist even harder the more they're pressured to reform by "Satan's World".

    Line in the sand, people.

  • ToesUp
    ToesUp

    I just watched the Panorama segment. It is amazing that when they interviewed the Presiding overseer he mentioned all the pressure that the members of the congregation have had to endure. Not a word said about the children that this sick monster has molested. WT is made up of true narcissists. It is always someone else's fault and they show NO empathy for anyone.

    Our hope is that the sh*t storm will continue for WT. The internet is blowing a massive hole in this cult. It will never go away but the damage continues.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot
    Vidiot - "Our hope is that the sh*t storm will continue for WT."

    Then keep linking, "liking", and hashtagging the shit out of it.

  • darkspilver
    darkspilver

    PLEASE NOTE: The original article has been amended. It appears that they forgot to upload the last TWO paragraphs to the website - I've copied them below. You can view the amended complete article here

    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-need-to-do-more-to-tackle-sexual-abuse-among-jehovahs-witnesses-b26nmjn90

    @ Half banana: Unfortunately most JWs don’t read The Times.

    And you do, I hope?

    I rechecked my copy of The Times newspaper for Thursday 26 January 2017 (Thursday editions carry a special weekly 'Legal & Law' section) - and I note that the article by Kathleen Hallisey was flagged up as being an 'online exclusive for Times members' in a box in the middle of page 55 - as per the picture below:



    The newly added last two paragraphs read as:

    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-need-to-do-more-to-tackle-sexual-abuse-among-jehovahs-witnesses-b26nmjn90

  • never a jw
    never a jw
    Half banana - "...Here’s the rub: to capitulate to secular law over the child abuse issue would expose a glaring inadequacy of Biblical wisdom... and Biblical wisdom is the premise for their existence."

    Oh no, the wisdom of the Bible is infinite and amazing (sarcasm , of course)

    Then Jesus said to them, "Give back to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's." And they were amazed at him. (Mark 12:17)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit