by LoveUniHateExams 6 Replies latest social current
Apparently, a rape victim of the Asian grooming gangs has wrote to the Home Office after breaking down the Hate Crime Unit's statistics on hate crimes in the UK.
Apparently, the guy who ran over a Muslim outside Finsbury Park Mosque committed a hate crime, but the Islamist who ran people over and stabbed people on London Bridge did not, according to the Hate Crime Unit within the Home Office.
Very interesting video detailing dodgy presentation of statistics …
The very sad thig about the effect of this totally unjustifiable attitude by the Home Office and the presentation of Statistics in such a misleading way, is that the Numb nuts in Government will go along with this, and more crimes by the people who are being shielded by this will happen.
Why is the Home Office, the Justice system the Government and the MSM so frightened of identifying Criminals, and the incidence of criminality, within certain Ethnic groups and Religious people of a certain kind ? why do they get a free ride ?
LoveUniHateExams:
Apparently, the guy who ran over a Muslim outside Finsbury Park Mosque committed a hate crime, but the Islamist who ran people over and stabbed people on London Bridge did not, according to the Hate Crime Unit within the Home Office.
The London Bridge attack was categorised as Terrorism rather than a Hate Crime because it was perpetrated by a specific group against indiscriminate targets whereas the UK legal definition of a hate crime specifically targets an identified group ('random people on a bridge' or 'probably not Muslims' are not specific categories to warrant the legal definition in question). Nothing to see here.
Nothing to see here - did you check out the way the Hate Crime Unit breaks down stats by race and presents these?
It's almost as if they have a secret agenda.
Interesting ...
LoveUniHateExams:
did you check out the way the Hate Crime Unit breaks down stats by race and presents these?
I refer only to the specific mischaracterisation of the London Bridge attack, not whether there is some broader real or imagined issue, which I have not investigated. However, it may be the case that other attacks that you might consider hate crimes may not have had a specific enough target to warrant that definition.
@Jeffro
Ok, so you didn't watch the whole video.
LoveUniHateExams:
Ok, so you didn't watch the whole video.
I didn't watch the video. I replied to your statement which included an incorrect assessment of the London Bridge attack. Not really interested in watching some partisan video at the moment, and if your incorrect definition of the London Bridge is a typical example of representations made by the video, I'm probably better off that way. But since I'm not watching the video, all I'm saying is that the London Bridge incident has been mischaracterised either by the video or by you.
