Update: Settlement between hospital and mom over "blood issue"

by Gopher 4 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    It looks like there have been some clarifications from yesterday's story. The mom involved isn't even a JW. But this follow-up story focuses on the JW's anyway.

    http://www.theomahachannel.com/health/2470112/detail.html

    TheOmahaChannel.com

    Hospital Lawsuit WithdrawnMother Who Refused
    Surgery For Her Baby, Hospital Reach Agreement



    OMAHA, Neb. -- Children's Hospital in Omaha has withdrawn its lawsuit
    against a mother who refused to allow doctors to perform surgery on her
    baby. The mother did not want a surgery to correct a heart defect the
    child has. The mother said her religion prohibits the blood transfusion
    that would be needed to perform the surgery, so she wouldn't allow
    doctors to do the procedure.

    The hospital and mother have reached an agreement, but neither side
    will comment on the details.

    Some religions dictate that blood transfusions are unnecessary,
    dangerous and immoral. "Genesis 9, chapter 4: 'Only flesh with its soul, its
    blood you must not eat,'" said Len Widhalm, explaining the biblical
    passage his religion--the Jehovah's Witnesses--relies on as proof blood
    transfusions are prohibited. People of his faith sometimes forego medical
    treatment to avoid relying on blood transfusions.

    "The blood does represent the life that comes from Jehovah," said
    Widhalm, "and so he has the ultimate decision as to what to do with that
    life."

    The Jehovah's Witnesses have a strong alliance, which steps into action
    when a member of their church faces decision on surgery. The church has
    1,600 hospital liaison committees around the world to help patients
    find alternatives. The church has produced videos to help patients find
    hospitals that specialize in bloodless medicine where procedures to
    reduce blood loss are the focus.

    This way, refusing treatment in the beginning doesn't mean an end for
    the patient.

    "We feel God's law is more important than trying to save our own
    lives," said Widhalm. But, he says, sometimes a parent's decision not to
    treat a child is viewed badly by the public. "Many times (it is) construed
    as negligent because we deny certain health care."

    Instead, Widhalm said, parents should be commended for upholding such
    strong beliefs.

    In cases involving children, a hospital is required by law to step in.
    Toby Schonfeld is on the medical ethics board for the University of
    Nebraska Medical Center. She said that before a case turns into a lawsuit,
    a hospital makes every attempt to work with the parent.

    "We don't think of it as the medical team against the family because
    that's not what it is about," said Schonfeld. "It's about the medical
    community helping the family to come to whatever decision it is that works
    best for everyone involved."

    While Jehovah's Witnesses are one example of religions that discourage
    blood transfusions, the mother named in the Omaha lawsuit is not a
    Jehovah's Witness.
    Thursday, a judge will hear both sides of the case and a
    decision will be made whether the hospital should proceed with the
    surgery.

  • outnfree
    outnfree

    OK, I don't get it.

    On the one hand:

    Children's Hospital in Omaha has withdrawn its lawsuit
    against a mother who refused to allow doctors to perform surgery on her
    baby.

    On the other hand:
    Thursday, a judge will hear both sides of the case and a
    decision will be made whether the hospital should proceed with the
    surgery.

    (or am I just dense today??)

    out

  • detective
    detective
    While Jehovah's Witnesses are one example of religions that discourage
    blood transfusions, the mother named in the Omaha lawsuit is not a
    Jehovah's Witness.

    Well, she certainly won't be a Jehovah's Witness if she allows her child to have blood...

    aw, but I know that'd not what they meant.

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    Outnfree,

    I don't get it, either! I guess the old adage still applies: You cannot believe everything you read on the internet. Sigh.

  • heathen
    heathen

    I guess I can't hold it against them if they wish to proceed with alternative technology over the use of blood . I like the idea actually but I think these people are being misled by whatever church they are in if they let the child die over the issue and I think the courts should over rule on the grounds that it is neglegent homicide to refuse treatment for their child. I don't care what a mature adult does as far as making decisions with their life but a young child should at least have a chance . I think the right to life ,liberty and persuit of happiness is the real issue .

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit