I faded away from the org 6 months ago - the best thing I have ever done!!
I have not given blood - yet, although I have been considering this. My leaving the org started because of the blood issue - I now realise that other issues the WT say are true are lies as well, it has helped to reinforce what I thought.
Yes there are problems associated with blood, but I have had reason to speak to a senior paediatric cardiothoracic surgeon who told me that he doesn't like using blood because of the risks involved, but in some circumstances there are no other alternatives.
I am more likely to believe him than I am a frustrated window-cleaner in the writing department at the org at Brooklyn.
A survey was carried out involving 300 UK hospitals regarding blood transfusions. 69.1% of problems involving blood were caused by patients being given the wrong blood type in the first place - not because of any disease in the blood itself. This problem could occur with medication, allergies to food etc.
You also have to weigh up the risks involved - when a patient is critically ill, which is the greater risk? The patient dying due to low haemoglobin levels, bleeding profusely etc?? Or the patient contracting a disease from blood given??
When will the WT society learn that each individual has the right to make up his own mind regarding his own treatment.
I left the org because of this issue - I am not DA or DF, my in-law family have not asked why I stopped going, and still they shun me.
I believe the organisation is contravening the Human Rights Act.
Article 9 "Freedom of thought, conscience and religion" - (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedome to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in the community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance. (2) Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Article 10 - Freedom of expression. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
Could Article 3 be applied here?? - Prohibition of torture : No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Could Article 3 be used because you are shunned for holding your own views and opinions which are allowed under Articles 9 and 10??
I am amazed the Society hasn't been taken to court more often, as in in the case of Khristiansko Sdruzhenie v Bulgaria (Application No 28626/95.
Are there any good lawyers out there spoiling for a fight???