Hello everyone,
I would like to remind you of this article:
:
*** w86 4/1 30 Questions From Readers ***
Why have Jehovah’s Witnesses disfellowshipped (excommunicated) for apostasy some who still profess belief in God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ?
"….Obviously, a basis for approved fellowship with Jehovah’s Witnesses cannot rest merely on a belief in God, in the Bible, in Jesus Christ, and so forth."
"Approved association with Jehovah’s Witnesses requires accepting the entire range of the true teachings of the Bible, including those Scriptural beliefs that are unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses…"
On the basis of the above, what about doubts???
*…not all doubt is bad. At times , you need to suspend acceptance of something
till you are sure of the facts;
*Religious exhortations to the effect that you should just believe and should doubt
nothing are dangerous and deceptive;
*A loving Christian is certainly ready to believe those who have proved trustworthy
in the past. But God's Word also warns against 'putting faith in every word.'(Prov.
14:15);
* Sometimes a person's past record gives legitimate reason for doubt. "Although
- the deceptive talker - makes his voice gracious," the Bible warns, " do not
believe in him." - Proverbs 26/24,25;
*The apostle John also warns Christians against blind belief. "Do not believe every
inspired expression," he writes. Rather, " test the inspired expressions to see
whether they originate with God." (1 John 4:1)´;
*An " expression," a teaching or opinion, might appear to emanate from God.
But did it really come from him? Exercising some doubt, or suspending belief,
can be a real protection because , as the apostle John says, " many deceivers
have gone forth into the world." - 2 John 7;
*Yes, an honest, humble examination of the facts to establish the truth is often called for.
(watchtower July 1st 2001 page 18).-
How can we , honestly harmonize the two articles, spaced in time
15 years?
In reality one should not have " doubts " among the JW , and if …necessity
demands, ask only the "authorized questions. To the idea of "sharing" with
others the fruitage of one's researches…do not think about it!
Now , in conclusion, organisations, associations etc. which refuse the most
elementary forms of "free speech and conversation " are called what???
Agape, J.C. MacHislopp