REFUGEES: when the LAMB lies down with the LION

by Terry 6 Replies latest jw friends

  • Terry
    Terry

    REFUGEES: the lamb lies down with the lions.
    ___________________________________________

    On this continent, the native peoples welcomed the early European settlers and nursed them through the winter. They shared and they traded. However, factions with ulterior interests arose. Christian Pilgrims saw their welcoming hosts as "noble savages" and heathens needing conversion!
    It didn't take long for the balance of power to shift. Good intentions paved that road straight to hell for the "Indians."

    If fine Pilgrim Christians can create a holocaust in a stone age nomadic people's society--what lesson is to be learned about innocently taking in refugees?
    _________

    In Japan, the Catholic missionaries arrived with peace, love and the miraculous offer of Christian teachings. That was in the early 1540's. In less than 50 years, 100,000 converts had been made threatening the culture, the stability and the security of those welcoming hosts. Suddenly, Catholics were banned.

    A pattern emerged: First the holy men and then the armies!

    Crusaders, the Inquisition, witch-hunts: a fine legacy of a peaceful religion!

    _______

    In ancient Rome, society was ecumenical. All gods and beliefs were acceptable. Then, a core group of evangelical martyrs began spreading like wildfire. Internal security was threatened. These pilgrims had no allegiances to the existing State. They had zero respect for "other" beliefs and traditions. They were banned but did not succumb. Within three centuries, Christianity dominated an empire which had lasted a thousand years. The church (Catholic) arose and became a dominant force which held sway for the next millennia and a half.
    ______

    In the 6th century, an illiterate orphan named Muhammed began spreading strange new teachings. In a short time, with 10,000 converts a wave of "convert or die" battles swept across the ancient world and cut a swathe through every existing society, government and authority.
    ________
    Long story short:
    accepting a human being on humanitarian grounds into your society is a beautiful and empathetic virtue until you suddenly discover how many of these refugees have been taught from birth that their "hosts" must convert or perish.

    Once the balance of power shifts j-u-s-t enough to form political wedges--the Trojan horse opens and out comes the gleaming points of cold, sharp steel in your midst.

    The Bible tells us that one day the lion will lie down with the lamb. But it fails to mention how delicious the lamb is to the lion.

    I applaud a sense of decency and mercy and compassion.
    But I take a historical and admittedly skeptical view of what religious absolutism does to otherwise kind, beautiful and decent people who are willing to do the unthinkable to achieve Paradise.

    If we cannot and do not find a way to filter out the dangerous from the peaceful refugees BEFORE allowing them inside the precious and vulnerable underbelly of our society--how can we be confident history will not once again repeat it's message to us?

    Nature is survival. Religion is not natural. Belief is immune from rational discourse. Absolute certainty that YOUR GOD is the only true god--well friends--that is the most potentially disruptive force within nature.

    As Elvis once said, "Don't be Cruel." But also, I might add, "DON'T BE STUPID."
    Binary thinking is stupid.

    We are a Nation of Refugees, but there was blood on our hands and the blood was our host's hospitality.

    Just be a bit more cautious before you knee-jerk your way to a wide, naive embrace of desperate people with a religious foundation which tells them their hosts must convert or die.

    BOTTOM LINE:

    Don't be a hater. Don't be naive, either. Take no binary view. Either / Or thinking is black and white. Life is not black in white. There is a grayscale of caution and optimism.

    Don't lie down with lions.

    You are too delicious to survive.


  • Divergent
    Divergent

    Talking about lambs, it reminded me...

    In the Bible, it says Jehovah is our shepherd, so is Jesus, as well as the overseers in the congregation. BUT... ever stopped to think why do shepherds shepherd sheep in the first place? We all know what happens ultimately - the sheep get slaughtered! Shepherds always have an ulterior motive which is unknown to the oblivious sheep!

    Sheep? No thanks. I'll rather be a mountain goat & live free & happy. What's up with the goat bashing anyway? Stupid book!

  • Terry
    Terry

    Yes, I think there are always ulterior motives at work--especially politically.

    Politicians need a constituency.

    On the Far Right, the older generation of Baby Boomers is all about Faith and Morals and Bible and Country, so they say. But, the backwardness and ignorance of their core constituency is laced with anti-Science and religious bigotry.

    Conservatives aren't winning new converts like the Liberal Progressives are doing with promises of "free" benefits. So, they hope to drive voters to the polls with fear-mongering about Terrorism.

    Alternately, Liberal politicians make a big show of "inclusiveness" to achieve a voting bloc which will keep them in office even though they hardly ever deliver on the big, bright, wonderful promises.

    Politics is a very cynical enterprise!

    I simply don't understand how rational citizens can be made again and again to BELIEVE politics solves more problems than it creates.

    How can you be a Republican? How can you be a Democrat? How can you be a Libertarian? I ask this of people I meet all the time.

    Do you really think simply believing you are right accomplishes anything other than arguments, pontificating, speechifying and a superior attitude?

    Sigh. . .

    We get the government we vote for.

    Don't blame me, I never have and never will vote.

    What makes a difference is work in your local community at a grassroots level of voluntarism. That's my opinion.

    Your mileage may vary :)

  • done4good
    done4good

    Nature is survival. Religion is not natural. Belief is immune from rational discourse. Absolute certainty that YOUR GOD is the only true god--well friends--that is the most potentially disruptive force within nature.

    There could not be a more spot on statement. It bears repeating.

    d4g

  • Pistoff
    Pistoff

    This is a complicated problem.

    One thing I think is certain: intense data collection will continue, either out in the open or the way it used to be done, secretly and under cover of black ops.

  • done4good
    done4good

    I simply don't understand how rational citizens can be made again and again to BELIEVE politics solves more problems than it creates.


    Terry, this point in of itself really is another grayscale issue. Politics in of itself certainly solves nothing. Politics are an unfortunate side effect of power and leadership. I don't think one needs to go to the extreme of being a non-voter or completely politically neutral, (these things really bring their own problems to society), just as I don't think being partisan in ideology is good for society.

    Government is a framework for a certain level of social order. It is necessary, or else you are simply left with anarchy. Not everyone can be a volunteer, not everyone can be a philanthropist. No one is a hero because they refuse to participate in the processes we have to work with, either. We need government, and the inherent politics that come with it to have any semblance of stability in society.

    d4g

  • Terry
    Terry
    done4good:
    done4good8 hours ago

    I simply don't understand how rational citizens can be made again and again to BELIEVE politics solves more problems than it creates.


    Terry, this point in of itself really is another grayscale issue. Politics in of itself certainly solves nothing. Politics are an unfortunate side effect of power and leadership. I don't think one needs to go to the extreme of being a non-voter or completely politically neutral, (these things really bring their own problems to society), just as I don't think being partisan in ideology is good for society.

    Government is a framework for a certain level of social order. It is necessary, or else you are simply left with anarchy. Not everyone can be a volunteer, not everyone can be a philanthropist. No one is a hero because they refuse to participate in the processes we have to work with, either. We need government, and the inherent politics that come with it to have any semblance of stability in society.
    ________________

    I don't disagree we need leaders and governance. In a free society, the "people" (voters) select from among whatever choices (I laugh) are offered.
    However--

    Almost invariably, the electorate is pig-ignorant.

    Dumb people make dumb choices.

    Plus--the corruption equals that of the Catholic Church in the time of the Protestant Reformation.

    No reforms are possible. Why? Because the scoundrels control the venue themselves.

    The people should vote on Pay Raises for politicians. Instead, the politicians vote on their own raises and benefits.

    That's not only corrupt--it is idiotic.

    How many people in the U.S. believe Bush went to war for the oil?

    How many believe 9-11 was an inside job?

    How many ordinary Conservatives believe the Earth is 6,000 years old? Decry evolution and repudiate science?

    How many Liberals think political correctness, social fairness, and unlimited giveaway programs solve more problems than creating new ones?

    LIFE IS NOT FAIR.

    NATURE IS NOT FAIR.

    How can you use politics to change human nature?

    Anyway. . .

    I don't mean to rant.

    Just one man's opinion.

    Your mileage may vary.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit