2 O'clock males and technology?

by frankiespeakin 6 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    C&P&L:

    I think sometimes that the two symbols of our present kind of technological culture are the rocket ship and the bulldozer. The rocket as a very, very phallic symbol of compensation for the sexually inadequate male; and the bulldozer, which ruthlessly pushes down hills and forests and alters the shape of the landscape. These are two symbols of the negative aspect of our technology. I'm not going to take the position that technology is a mistake. I think that there could be a new kind of technology, using a new attitude. But the trouble is that a great deal of our power is wielded by men who I would call "two o'clock types."

    Maybe you saw an article I wrote in "Playboy" magazine called "The Circle of Sex," and it suggested at least a dozen sexual types rather than two. And that the men who are two o'clock on the dial, like a clock, are men who are ambisexterous, named after Julius Ceasar, because Julius Ceasar was an ambisexterous man, and he equally made love to all his friend's wives and to his good-looking officers. And he had no sense of guilt about this at all.

    Now, that type of male in this culture has a terrible sense of guilt, that he might be homosexual, and is scared to death of being one, and therefore he has to overcompensate for his masculanity. And so he comes on as a police officer, Marine sergeant, bouncer, bookie, general--tough, cigar-chewing, real masculine type who is never able to form a relationship with a woman; they're just "dames" as far as he's concerned. But he, just like an ace Air Force pilot puts a little mark on his plane each time he shoots down an enemy, so this kind of man, every time he makes a dame, he chalks up one, because that reassures him that he is after all a male. And he's a terrible nuisance. The trouble is that the culture doesn't permit him to recognize and accept his ambisexterity. And so he's a trouble spot.

    But that kind of spirit of knocking the world around is something that is causing serious danger here. It arises, you see, because this tremendous technological power has been evolved in a culture which inherits a sense of personality which is frankly a hallucination. And we get this sense of personality from a long, long tradition of Jewish and Christian and Greek ideas which have caused man to feel that the universe of nature--the physical world, in other words--is not himself. You may think that that is a very odd thing to say, because one always assumes that oneself is one's own body, or at least something inside one's body, like a soul. And that naturally, everything outside is not oneself. But this is, as I've said many, many times, a hallucination.

    Let's think here we are in the middle of New York City. And you know what happens when New York City goes wrong. When there's a subway strike, or when the power fails, or when the sewers back up, your life is in danger. Because you are not only constituted by the bloodstream of your veins and the communications network of your nervous sytem. An extention of your bloodstream, and of your alimentary canal, and of your nervous system, is all the communication systems of this city.

    http://www.geocities.com/~gaiachurch/slf-othr.html

  • JamesThomas
    JamesThomas

    Hey Frankie, This is an interesting article. The core message being " You don't look out there for God, something in the sky, you look in you". Mr. Watts who died somewhere in the 70's or 80's was too much of an intellectual for me and my three brain cells. I found it easy to get lost in his explanations, and had to strain to find the simple essence of what he was saying so that that I could hold them, taste them, and understand. You, on the other hand may gleam more from his works. There are explanations and guidance simpler still. The Truth, is extremely simple. Yet, more radical than any science fiction. j

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    JT,

    Yes he has an interesting veiw point.

    I think he may be getting through to me, He help me get over this "Christian" thing, which has releived much stress.

  • SYN
    SYN

    Unfortunately, humanity has become far too intricately enmeshed with it's technology to ever get rid of it.

    If we did, most of the world would starve to death almost straight away, and life would be extremely uncomfortable for the rest.

    The Gaia hypotheses is pretty obvious, when you think about it. We just don't know how accurate it is yet. There's piles of research proving that humans are affecting the world around them and that sometimes it "bites back", so to speak.

    A really interesting question is how does a Gaia reproduce?

    Regards,
    [SYN]

  • gitasatsangha
    gitasatsangha
    A really interesting question is how does a Gaia reproduce?

    with Venus or Uranus?

    ,, I am sorry.

  • JamesThomas
    JamesThomas
    I think he may be getting through to me, He help me get over this "Christian" thing, which has releived much stress.

    I understand. Letting go of the "Christian thing" relieved a lot of stress for me as well. It seems that the Christian way generally makes demands and threatens with some type of punishment if the demands go unmet. Since our religious beliefs can run so very deep this can be extremely taxing in ways we are not even aware of.

    The way of openness and stillness which asks nothing except that we be present with life in the moment seems more natural and kind, at least to me.

    j

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    JT,

    Once I was able to see the powerful mind control properties of requiring faith in Jesus for salvation I came to see why it was such a hard doctrine to get rid of.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit