I've read here on many occasions where the current WT article or an Awake! article was just recycled from an earlier publication. For example purposes only, say a WT article from 2/15/04 was just a re-spun, change a few words here and there recycling of an earlier article from, say, Awake! 5/30/89. (I'm not a JW so please bear with me if all my nomenclature isn't completely correct.) Sometimes I've read where it was even a simple cut-and-paste recycling of an earlier article.
My question is this: Is there a compilation of these "do-overs" that someone with access to the publications has done or knows about? Can anyone point me to a site or thread that covers this to any extent? Where a current article is an older article retitled and just pasted in? Is this even possible? My reasons are that I would find it interesting to be able to show my JW girlfriend when she exclaims about a wonderful talk or the article itself that it's merely a repeat of an earlier one. (She was overwhelmed by the talk Tuesday 6/14/2004 about how all people have problems, troubles, health, financial and personal crises, etc. I told her anyone with 1/2 a brain could have told her that and that I could have given her that bit of brilliant information and saved her an hour's worth of her time. She didn't really get my implication...)
I'd be interested in what she would say if I told her a study article she read and found so "encouraging" was just a repeat of the same message from a few months or years back. Then I'd make (I'm sure ) a smart-ass comment about there not being much new coming from the WTS these days and they're just lazily repeating (regurgitating...) previous "light."
Any help or information would be appreciated. I wonder if this could be done easily if it has not been done already. I guess you'd need the new articles and a bunch of back copies of different publications (along with a good memory!) and some time. Oh well, just thought I'd ask this scholarly bunch! You guys are SO smart! (A little ass-kissing never hurts...)
Thanks for any and all input.
Robert